HikerGuy83
Diamond Member
- Dec 26, 2021
- 11,532
- 8,803
- 2,138
That your OP was a lie ?well you're the first person I've seen acknowledging this
I don't think I was the first.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That your OP was a lie ?well you're the first person I've seen acknowledging this
No, he was having microphone problems. Try watching more than 5 seconds sometime, before buying into some stupid lefty hack's imaginary version...
I think I'd be unaware that you had done so but go ahead and put me on ignore if it makes you feel better.What a CROCK.
tl;dr. I should put you on Ignore for being a nutbag.
Okay, is it 1964?? lol Nobody cares if you vote or not, we do care that you vote informed. Getting your 'news' from the lying spinning in the tank for Democrats news media means you will be woefully uninformed.When I was a child I didn't understand why there were people in our country willing to kill others to keep them from voting. It's only been in the last decade can I say that I truly understand that the contest for the office of president of the U.S. and who holds the house and the senate is a fight for power and control over the lives of others.
Number 1: I was referring to news sources for all things in our world not just the current election
Number 2: I will always VOTE, God willing, if for no other reason than there are such hateful people who don't want me to. I may not have much or any power or influence in the world but I can deny certain people the pleasure of having kept my vote from counting.
There were three prominent civil rights activists—James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner—who were murdered in 1964 during the "Freedom Summer" voter registration drive in Mississippi. Each came from different backgrounds, but all shared a commitment to fighting racial injustice and promoting voter rights for Black Americans in the South. Here’s a summary of each individual and their contributions:
1. James Chaney
- Background: Born and raised in Meridian, Mississippi, James Earl Chaney was an African American activist dedicated to the civil rights movement from a young age. He joined the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) and became active in registering Black Americans to vote.
- Role and Legacy: As a local resident, Chaney provided essential knowledge of Mississippi and its community dynamics to his fellow activists. His death at the age of 21 highlighted the dangers that Black Americans faced when challenging the racial status quo in the South.
2. Andrew Goodman
- Background: Andrew Goodman was a white Jewish college student from New York City. Born in 1943, he grew up in a progressive household and was passionate about social justice. His parents were actively involved in the NAACP and other progressive organizations, which influenced his decision to participate in the Freedom Summer project.
- Role and Legacy: Goodman joined CORE’s voter registration project in Mississippi and was one of the first volunteers to arrive for the Freedom Summer initiative. His murder at age 20, along with his companions, served to bring national attention to the violent resistance to civil rights in the South.
3. Michael Schwerner
- Background: Michael Schwerner, also known as "Mickey," was a 24-year-old social worker and civil rights activist from New York City. He had a background in sociology and worked with his wife in the civil rights movement, advocating for desegregation and voting rights.
- Role and Legacy: Schwerner was a CORE field organizer and one of the leading figures in the Freedom Summer campaign. He was known for his dedication to equality and willingness to face the dangers inherent in working in Mississippi. His murder, alongside Chaney and Goodman, underscored the risks that activists faced in their work to dismantle segregation.
The Murders and Their Impact
On June 21, 1964, the three men went missing after being stopped by law enforcement and subsequently released, only to be attacked and killed by members of the Ku Klux Klan. Their bodies were found weeks later, buried in an earthen dam. The brutal murder of these young men highlighted the lethal resistance to the civil rights movement and helped to galvanize public support for federal civil rights legislation. The case brought national attention to the violence faced by civil rights workers in the South and contributed to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Sources
- "Mississippi Burning Murders" — [FBI](https://vault.fbi.gov/Mississippi%20Burning%20%28MIBURN%29%20/
How is my OP a lie? At the rate of the apparent mental decline in Trump, it's not within the realm of possibility that Vance would be at the helm of the country instead of Trump?That your OP was a lie ?
I don't think I was the first.
Well it ain't Harris is it? Or any other woman as a matter of fact.If that was Harris would you be saying the same thing?
Or any woman as a matter of fact?
AP, UPI, REUTERS,WHO then? Who should I be going to for my news?
Funny that you should say that. It took me forever to vote this year because Washington State put together a very nice 111 page document that explains each of the initiates, the candidates personal statements if they provided one, their bio, etc.Okay, is it 1964?? lol Nobody cares if you vote or not, we do care that you vote informed. Getting your 'news' from the lying spinning in the tank for Democrats news media means you will be woefully uninformed.
You are being selectively blind to the exact same actions by the left, and your admission earlier in this post the you refuse debate the merits of my argument indicate to me that your mind is completely biased and closed to any facts that you don't want to acknowledge opting instead for the left's smears. Bottom line, you are more concerned with personalities and rhetoric than you are on the facts of the successes and failures of the past two admins. You would rather vote for an obviously incompetent, unqualified candidate that has won NO primary elections, putting the country in terrible danger than to admit the mistake and fix it.But not so with Trump, he's very aggrieved on a multitude of subjects and some of them are not even "real". And by real I mean that in our business you have people who are targeted for things that they have done and/or said, but then there is an additional category of things that they are "perceived" to have done and said.
First of all I did watch the video clip and yes it was just a small segment nonetheless I did hear him say what he did that I cited above.
Why does Trump need a horde of his supporters to interpret what he meant when he talks? Had he simply indicated what you wrote above then perhaps this misunderstanding could have been avoided, if indeed it's a misunderstanding and not a signal to his minions that this is what he would like to see happen.
Do you think that it's responsible behavior for anyone in public to state that they want to see someone have 9 guns pointed at them, let alone a presidential candidate? That type of verbiage, especially against a woman is violent rhetoric. None of us could make the same statement substituting Trump in the place of Cheney with risking attention from the U.S. secret service.
If that's what he meant, he could have easily just said that, but I understand it's not easy for him to express his thoughts a lot of times.
;why dont' you look up what he actually said, and not repeat what someone thinks he said?Do you think that it's responsible behavior for anyone in public to state that they want to see someone have 9 guns pointed at them, let alone a presidential candidate?
I'm hardly a lemming but I can understand why this would upset some people, I just didn't realize that it would become a sore spot.Well it ain't Harris is it? Or any other woman as a matter of fact.
So your reply is just a deflection. This entire "blowing the microphone" narrative is just Trump Smear #10,999, and you are just another lefty lemming for not making yourself aware of the facts.
No it won't be. We won't have any of those things because of trump. Biiden has created a great economy and trump will run numbers by you guys like he did last time and you guys will give him credit for what he didn't do.Trump getting elected and serving a full 4 years will be the best thing that's happened to America in 50 years. You'll have more money and food and gas, it'll be ok.![]()
So you read the Dem propaganda printed by the Dem ruling party in Washington State, got it. Pay more attention to the Washington State Dems actions, not what flows out of their lying corrupt mouths. Like Washington State Dems jacking up gas taxes 50 cents a gallon in the middle of sky high inflation, slamming the poor and working class. Actions not words.Funny that you should say that. It took me forever to vote this year because Washington State put together a very nice 111 page document that explains each of the initiates, the candidates personal statements if they provided one, their bio, etc.
I'm more informed this year than I have ever been because I actually read up on each of the items I cast my vote for.
But not to worry ConcernAmerican provided me with some alternative news sites, I already have the Wall Street Journal in my browser for additional reading.
Hope you have a good week.
If you had been aware of anything, you woud know that trump didn't create the economy he had and that Biden has created a record economy. What primary did trump run in? He didn't debate and put his family in charge of the party. Harris is more qualified than trump even if trump has been president.You are being selectively blind to the exact same actions by the left, and your admission earlier in this post the you refuse debate the merits of my argument indicate to me that your mind is completely biased and closed to any facts that you don't want to acknowledge opting instead for the left's smears. Bottom line, you are more concerned with personalities and rhetoric than you are on the facts of the successes and failures of the past two admins. You would rather vote for an obviously incompetent, unqualified candidate that has won NO primary elections, putting the country in terrible danger than to admit the mistake and fix it.
If you looked at actions. then you don't support a 34 time convicted felon.So you read the Dem propaganda printed by the Dem ruling party in Washington State, got it. Pay more attention to the Washington State Dems actions, not what flows out of their lying corrupt mouths. Like Washington State Dems jacking up gas taxes 50 cents a gallon in the middle of sky high inflation, slamming the poor and working class. Actions not words.
Wow, you are upset about the violent imagery of suggesting the elite grab a gun and put themselves in harm's way instead of our youth? Where was this righteous indignation when Trump's life was threatened twice and two republican supporters were assaulted and murdered? Your concern is quite disingenuous and hypocritical.I get that, now. But why the need to use such violent imagery?
So your conclusion is that I admit my mistake and then "fix it"? Fix it HOW? There is nothing that has been discussed that is within my power to FIX. Even when I refused to vote for Clinton, she still got all of our state's electoral votes.You are being selectively blind to the exact same actions by the left, and your admission earlier in this post the you refuse debate the merits of my argument indicate to me that your mind is completely biased and closed to any facts that you don't want to acknowledge opting instead for the left's smears. Bottom line, you are more concerned with personalities and rhetoric than you are on the facts of the successes and failures of the past two admins. You would rather vote for an obviously incompetent, unqualified candidate that has won NO primary elections, putting the country in terrible danger than to admit the mistake and fix it.
Your comment is based on a lie.If that was Harris would you be saying the same thing?
Or any woman as a matter of fact?
No, I did too. Jonah Goldberg, the asshole who posted it first, has acknowledged that it is a lie.well you're the first person I've seen acknowledging this so there is that![]()
I did and what I saw was not in context so I'll concede this point.;why dont' you look up what he actually said, and not repeat what someone thinks he said?