I am Outraged at Trump for having a Major Drug Cartel leader arrested!

[Slade3200]

When was Putin on trial? Let alone convicted? Is Putin even under indictment by the US Federal Govt or for that matter any state?

Why don't you stick to the facts.

I’ll repeat… He is absolutely guilty of war crimes.

 

[Delldude]

Asking if we are to become an imperialist country now is not silly at all given the fact that Trump literally took over Venezuela by military force and is threatening several other countries

Where's the boots on the ground and command centers?

 

[struth]

I’ll repeat… He is absolutely guilty of war crimes.

I appreciate that’s your opinion. With that said, that has nothing to do with being under federal indictment by a court in the United States

 

[Blisterfinger]

Hahaha, you think I’m siding with dictators?! That’s funny.

Of course you are, if Trump does it you are against it. It's called TDS slide

 

[Blisterfinger]

The only thing closed here is your mind.

I am just glad for the sake of our nation that your lawfare didn't work and the people were able to set such a wrong situation right.

 

[BackAgain]

Correct he illegally seized power and has been in control of the country for years… as its leader

Fake leader. Not real leader.

 

[BackAgain]

Asking if we are to become an imperialist country now is not silly at all given the fact that Trump literally took over Venezuela by military force and is threatening several other countries

Silly question, hyperbolic and evidence of your bed-wetting tendencies.

 

[krichton]

Umm simple, by filing motion, after motion, after motion to protract the proceedings, stall for time and run out the clock to election.

In the document case all of that was entertained by a Trumptard named Cannon, who stalled, and stalled and stalled, until one day when all the stalling ran out she threw out the case because supposedly Smith was TOO independant from DOJ - a conclusion she could have arrived on DAY 1 of the case. Of course if she did that, then the case would be refiled in another court and Trump would 100% get a verdict before election.

Anyone familiar with the proceedings knows that.

It was wonderful how Garland waited as long as he did to finally authorize an investigation, giving Trump all the opportunity to run out the clock. As if a criminal like Trump didn't already have every advantage already. This also completely goes against the "lawfare" conspiracy lie because if Biden really wanted to nail Trump he wouldn't have allowed Garland to twiddle his thumbs for 18 months.

 

[krichton]

No. We did use some bombs to seize Maduro but he wasn’t the Vz leader.

And the messaging about “control” of the country isn’t a model of clarity. However, what is becoming clear is that we need to be there only until they complete their transition to the actual leader from their former fake leader.

The question wasn’t about a foreign conflict. The question is about the US supposedly being involved in any wars. None in Vz. None in Iran. None in Syria. None in Somalia. None anywhere.

You can argue that Maduro isn't a legitimate president but he was nevertheless the president of the country, just like Putin is the president of Russia. I see no point in making this a debate.

Right, we need to be there just like we were in Afghanistan and Iraq, unless we want the country to fall into complete chaos because the current regime isn't going to let go of power just because we say so. I'm not sure what reality you're living in where we simply anoint the next president, leave and everything is all hunky dory after. Also, let's not forget, that we're there for the oil. Trump has said he wants to rebuild their entire oil infrastructure, which in it's current state is completely unusable. We need a substantial military presence in order to nation build.

 

[krichton]

I appreciate that’s your opinion. With that said, that has nothing to do with being under federal indictment by a court in the United States

According to article 2 of the UN Charter

“All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state…”

This is binding international law and the US just broke it. It's not an "opinion." If Venezuela invaded the US and kidnapped Trump, you and Maga as a whole would be screaming about war crimes for 24 hours a day. Let's be honest.

 

[BackAgain]

You can argue that Maduro isn't a legitimate president but he was nevertheless the president of the country,

No. He wasn’t. You can claim he was “legitimate,” but it ignores reality. And if he wasn’t legitimate (and he wasn’t) then he wasn’t their President.

just like Putin is the president of Russia. I see no point in making this a debate.

Putin is the president of Russia. So, it’s a stupid “analogy” by you. So, no wonder you prefer to evade the reality of the matter.

Right, we need to be there just like we were in Afghanistan and Iraq, unless we want the country to fall into complete chaos because the current regime isn't going to let go of power just because we say so.

Wow. You’re the mistress of unsupportable, stupid but failed analogies.

I'm not sure what reality you're living in where we simply anoint the next president, leave and everything is all hunky dory after.

Please link to the post where I ever made such a claim. TIA.

Also, let's not forget, that we're there for the oil.

Nope. We can’t “forget” your false claim. Oil is but a very small part of why we’re there. Your thinking along such lines suffers from your complete lack of comprehension. We don’t need their oil. But nations like Russia do. So, it’s not really about “oil.”

Instead, it’s largely about geopolitics.

Trump has said he wants to rebuild their entire oil infrastructure, which in its current state is completely unusable.

Sort of what he said. And?

We need a substantial military presence in order to nation build.

We aren’t engaged in nation building.

You have many false premises in your failed analysis.

 

[krichton]

As usual, you are sadly confused.

He had no classified material. Period. He had already ordered them “declassified.”

And when the National Archives sought to get the DOJ involved, there has been no crime. The Presidential Records Act is NOT (and it never was) a criminal statute.

The lawfare involved an FBI “investigation” over a matter that was not criminal. The lawfare was in indicting him over nothing. The lawfare also included having a Biden DOJ official lens himself to NYC’s Manhattan DA’s Office to obtain an indictment against Trump for no crimes (and the lawfare includes twisting themselves into pretzels to even make out a pretend set of charges.

Your kind of determined ignorance has no value in any of these discussions.

I am not the one confused here. Even Trump's own lawyers have never made that claim in any legal filings or in court. You're parroting propaganda from the liar in chief. Only he has ever said he "declassified" documents simply by thinking about it. That isn't how you declassify top secret documents. Furthermore, Trump also had nuclear secrets in his possession. Those can never be declassified by the president under any circumstances.

 

[BackAgain]

I am not the one confused here.

Yeah. In fact, you are.

Even Trump's own lawyers have never made that claim in any legal filings or in court.

Never a need to do so. Also, beside the point.

You're parroting propaganda from the liar in chief.

False. I never paraphrase any Democrat talking points.

Only he has ever said he "declassified" documents simply by thinking about it.

He never said that, either. I assume you never bothered to look and see what he did actually say. You shitlibs are a lazy ignorant lot.

That isn't how you declassify top secret documents.

Irrelevant. It’s not what he did or said he had done.

Furthermore, Trump also had nuclear secrets in his possession.

According to whom?

Those can never be declassified by the president under any circumstances.

Wrong again. As the embodiment of the Executive Branch, he has an ability to declassify whatever he sees fit to declassify.
But your speculation is baseless, anyway.

 

[struth]

According to article 2 of the UN Charter

“All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state…”

This is binding international law and the US just broke it. It's not an "opinion." If Venezuela invaded the US and kidnapped Trump, you and Maga as a whole would be screaming about war crimes for 24 hours a day. Let's be honest.

But we didn't threaten or use force against any state. Meduro was not the President of Venezula, he was an occupying force, that was in fact supported, and guarded by Cuban guards. He was not elected, he used his narcoterrorist forces, and other state agents to oppress the state.....and he, and his gang, not only threatened, but used forced against the terroritorial intergrity of the United States and our political independence. The proof of that, is a Grand Jury in NYC, found enough evidence, to indict him and members of his gang, for crimes against the United States.

Also, kidnapping is an unlawful act, arresting someone, under a Court order, is not unlawful. So, you know you fail.

 

[AntonToo]

It was wonderful how Garland waited as long as he did to finally authorize an investigation

....which was how long in your mind?

 

[Slade3200]

Where's the boots on the ground and command centers?

Floating off shore

 

[Slade3200]

I appreciate that’s your opinion. With that said, that has nothing to do with being under federal indictment by a court in the United States

How about Guddaffi in Libya. Did you support our intervention there? Do you support Trump targeting/threatening Columbia and Greenland and Mexico?

 

[Slade3200]

Of course you are, if Trump does it you are against it. It's called TDS slide

Can’t handle the heat I see. I’m not surprised

 

[Slade3200]

Fake leader. Not real leader.

No difference. The dude was running the country

 

[Slade3200]

Silly question, hyperbolic and evidence of your bed-wetting tendencies.

Evidenced and backed up by trumps own actions in Ven…. And words/threats to Columbia, Greenland, Mexico etc. in the aftermath