explain how socialism and modern communism are all based on criticisms of capitalism if they preceded capitalism itself. how is it thomas mun and adam smith predate folks like karl marx?
Well you're not getting a paper or thesis.
Why did Smith precede Marx? Simple, he defined capitalism. He had to come before the critics of the new understanding of economics could exist. But think about it. What do the critics of capitalism all want, functionally speaking? A return to a feudal system with different nobility (preferably them).
How is the party different from nobility? How are serfs different from the proletariat?
Capitalism came as an affront to the Feudal and mercantile systems that existed before it. Jakob Fugger if you must know was a banking magnate who became one of the richest people who ever lived in adjusted dollars. His influence helped shape the Renaissance in Germany and wielded more power than many landed nobility, till the Holy Roman Empire decided to make him landed nobility as well.
The rise of the rich 3rd estate threw the entire concept of powerless serfs under the carriage. The nobility who had power, but not necessarily the money (for the two do not always go hand in hand) looked for many ways to strip the newly acquired wealth from these people who were meant to be their servants but were managing to even exceed their station.
As well the nouveau riche discovered that they knew how to manufacture and earn money gave them the ability to enjoy the luxuries reserved once ONLY for nobility and grew a powerful taste for it. They lacked the political power though to defend what they had earned, and often were more productive and useful members of society, and began to consider if they did not deserve their rightful place in power.
If anything, There is more in common with the old, obsolete feudal system and the leftist rainbow (liberalism, Communism, Marxism, Socialism, Progressivism, Fascism). Conversely, capitalism has more in common with the political upheaval of the 1700's and the philosophy of Burke among many other similar philosophers.
I'm sorry, but you're very wrong in this. Very very VERY wrong in who the historical founders of modern leftist thought are. They are kith and kin philosophically, more with Louis the XIV than Adam Smith.