Some people think America is the world villian.
Again, it shows just how clueless and ungrateful they are and don't deserve to live here.
I wish he, and others like him, would go live in Iran for a few years as an average Iranian, or Venezuela or Cuba or Syria...etc. etc.
He would literally kiss the ground of our soil when he got back.
Some in the world, like Putin and other world leaders, paint the US as the 'bad guy' who injects themselves into the business of other nations, of being the rogue aggressor who 'invades' other nations.
In some ways our leaders have created / perpetuated that image.
After 9/11/01 I was all for going after the terrorists who caused 9/11, of striking and going to war in Afghanistan.
IMO we did not need to go to war in Iraq. Iraq was keeping Russia occupied / at bay, and IMO Hussein was declaring to the world he had WMD as a veiled threat to keep his enemies at his borders at bay...it was a bluff....a bluff he carried way to far...giving the US cause to invade. Is Iraq better off without Hussein around? It depends on who you ask. If you ask the citizens of Iraq who were being gassed, tortured, oppressed...the answer is 'Yes'. Did we need to go in? Again, it depends on who you ask? JFK said we would pay any price, bear any burden to stand with those fighting for freedom. (Am I saying JFK would have gone in? Absolutely not. I do not speak for JFK and anyone trying to do so is only speculating.)
The FACT is, however, we had ZERO business being dragged into an Un-Constitutional war in either Libya or Syria to help terrorists try to take over their own nations. Al Qaeda in Libya, for God's sake, is the same Al Qaeda that slaughtered 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01, and Barry took the country to war to help them acquire control of their own country. Syria was engaged in a massive civil war involving numerous different sides - we were never asked to come in, but Barry dragged the US to war in Syria in an attempt to oust the nation's leader ... to leave the country in CHAOS as there was no side in strong position to benefit / take over...and the side he chose to arm / train / support was ISIS.
Iraq, Libya, Syria - all places we did not belong, had no REAL reason to be in, but incidents where the US went in anyway. Again, I am not talking about after the decisions were made, if anything good came out of them, etc...just the decision to go in to begin with. An argument can be made that the US has acted aggressively, sticking its nose into other nations' business...when many of those situations were the U.N.'s responsibility to deal with....
...but let's be real - the U.N. is a useless organization, a collection of world nation reps who do nest to nothing these days, that is rife with corruption, and that is under fire for the partially-proven habit of raping and pillaging areas in which they send troops....
Barry's illegal wars in Libya and Syria did not help the US argument that we are not 'aggressors' but act in only self-defense/preservation. Bush, at least, had Congressional approval to use force as he saw fit / as necessary. Barry sought his own and international authority to go into Libya and Syria, not authority from Congress as per the Constitution.