Hunter Biden

[Slade3200]

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

Well then in your infinite words of wisdom... if Trump was innocent then why not testify and clear the air?

same applies to biden,,,

sounds to me like you know theres something to hide and is why youre against it,,,,

I’m not against it going through the proper channels. I don’t see anything there except for a shiny object for Trump but if there was really documentation proving what you allege then there should be an FBI/DOJ investigation and all could be rooted out. It should be a legal issue not a political issue. So why isn’t that happening?

maybe thats why trump turned it over to the DOJ as he stated in the phone call,,,

Let’s see about that. Trump says a lot of things that aren’t rooted in reality. Barr has an actual process that he has to go through to substantiate and initiate investigations. If he has one into the Biden’s then I have no idea why that wouldn’t be public right now. It would take a load off Trumps shoulders. Thoughts about why they would be keeping it secret?

 

[Slade3200]

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

Well then in your infinite words of wisdom... if Trump was innocent then why not testify and clear the air?

same applies to biden,,,

sounds to me like you know theres something to hide and is why youre against it,,,,

To be clear... are you saying Trump should have sat down with Mueller if he had nothing to hide?

this topic is about biden,, if you want to talk about trump then start another thread,,,

Ive been talking about Biden. But you seem to be throwing a double standard out here and that’s relevant to your credibility. It shows if you are speaking from a partisan/political position or from an objective/principled position.

So what’s the answer? Should Trump have sat down with Mueller if he had nothing to hide?

 

[Jitss617]

I’m pretty sure it was bribery.. and a investigation will prove it... this will hang over democrats heads for ever if you don’t investigate .. just clean your house and you might win an election.

were you also pretty sure Hillary Clinton was running a child porn ring out of the basement of a pizza parlor?

Would you like me to post pictures of John podesta‘s artwork?

What for?

What do you mean why not.. you said Hillary and pizza gate no? Can you explain his art work?

First off I said “what for” Not “why not”... may seem trivial but its a perfect example of how off you are when it comes to communication. Just be accurate it isn’t hard.

I love that you are now trying to defend the pizzagate nonsense. Of course you believe it! Another perfect example why nobody should take anything you say seriously. Game over

Lol it’s funny when democrats have some shady involvement you never want it investigated... BUT IF TRUMP SPEAKS DIFFERENTLY LOL OMG IMPEACH! Investigate! The world is falling!

 

[Faun]

i just find it so rich that you are taking the “if he has nothing to hide then what’s the harm” position after experiencing all trump has done during the “witch hunt” and now ignoring the subpoenas. Were you calling for Trump to testify to mueller? Are you now calling for all his staffers to testify and stop ignoring subpoenas?

because Trump and all those people were actual material subjects to the investigation at hand. Biden is a sideshow distraction that Trump was trying to ignite for an election. If there was any evidence to substantiate investigating the Biden’s then there would be a DOJ investigation but there isn’t. It’s a joke, a rabbit hole, and you’re a total hypocrite. Congrats. Following Trump has made you look like a fool once again.

all the documented facts say otherwise,,,,

Why isn’t there an FBI/DOJ investigation if there is all this material evidence?

And why are you being a hypocrite calling for Biden to testify while excusing all the Trumpsters for hiding?

when did i excuse trump?? and besides there was no appearance that he committed a crime and there is with biden

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

 

[progressive hunter]

all the documented facts say otherwise,,,,

Why isn’t there an FBI/DOJ investigation if there is all this material evidence?

And why are you being a hypocrite calling for Biden to testify while excusing all the Trumpsters for hiding?

when did i excuse trump?? and besides there was no appearance that he committed a crime and there is with biden

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

 

[Faun]

Why isn’t there an FBI/DOJ investigation if there is all this material evidence?

And why are you being a hypocrite calling for Biden to testify while excusing all the Trumpsters for hiding?

when did i excuse trump?? and besides there was no appearance that he committed a crime and there is with biden

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

 

[Jitss617]

when did i excuse trump?? and besides there was no appearance that he committed a crime and there is with biden

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

WaAaa waaaaaa I’m crying! Bad prosecutor how dare he investigate Democrats were so nice and good American needs a look at Chicago and Detroit watching the DC Baltimore were so good for America lol

INSANE HAHAH

 

[progressive hunter]

when did i excuse trump?? and besides there was no appearance that he committed a crime and there is with biden

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

 

[Faun]

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

WaAaa waaaaaa I’m crying! Bad prosecutor how dare he investigate Democrats were so nice and good American needs a look at Chicago and Detroit watching the DC Baltimore were so good for America lol

INSANE HAHAH

 

[Faun]

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

Bullshit. The record shows he refused to cooperate with the U.K., who actually was investigating Zlochevsky. Initially, the U.K. froze over $23m of his assets, but then a U.K. court unfroze them after a year of being scuttled by Shokin.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.



​

 

[Faun]

You just asked when you made an excuse for Trump and then in the next sentence you literally made an excuse for Trump. Haha, was that on purpose?

you are going to get all twisted up like a pretzel if you keep going down this road.

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

Liar.

 

[Lesh]

So we finally have Trumpers admitting that they know Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma or Biden.

Ohhh...now he claims he "was going to"...sure

 

[progressive hunter]

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

Bullshit. The record shows he refused to cooperate with the U.K., who actually was investigating Zlochevsky. Initially, the U.K. froze over $23m of his assets, but then a U.K. court unfroze them after a year of being scuttled by Shokin.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.



​

the documents provided in my link say otherwise,,,and they are government documents not some opinion article,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

no pretzeling needed,,,there is clear evidence that biden used the power of his office to squash an investigation into a company his son worked for,,, and there was none for trump in the russian collusion scam,,,

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

Liar.

documents say otherwise,,,

 

[Faun]

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

Bullshit. The record shows he refused to cooperate with the U.K., who actually was investigating Zlochevsky. Initially, the U.K. froze over $23m of his assets, but then a U.K. court unfroze them after a year of being scuttled by Shokin.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.



​

the documents provided in my link say otherwise,,,and they are government documents not some opinion article,,,

Liar. I just posted a link to a news article stating exactly what I said. Your videos don't put a dent in it.

 

[Faun]

The only evidence of that is the former Prosecutor General who only now claims that and who has an axe to grind against Biden for getting him fired. Meanwhile, there are news reports going back years showing it was more than the U.S. who wanted him out and that there was no active investigation ongoing into Burisma.

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

Liar.

documents say otherwise,,,

Liar.

This is what a link to evidence is ... Here it is again ...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.​

 

[progressive hunter]

THE FACTS SAY THAT HE WAS FIRED BY BIDEN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO REOPEN THE INVESTIGATION ONE MONTH BEFORE HE WAS FIRED,, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE THE SAME TIME BURISMA CONTACTED THE STATE DEPT AND USED HUNTERS NAME TO GET IT STOPPED,, and low and behold joe gets him fired,,,

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

Bullshit. The record shows he refused to cooperate with the U.K., who actually was investigating Zlochevsky. Initially, the U.K. froze over $23m of his assets, but then a U.K. court unfroze them after a year of being scuttled by Shokin.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.



​

the documents provided in my link say otherwise,,,and they are government documents not some opinion article,,,

Liar. I just posted a link to a news article stating exactly what I said. Your videos don't put a dent in it.

its the documents not the video dumbass,,,
your article is opinion

 

[Faun]

Bullshit. If Shokin wanted to investigate Burisma and Zlochevsky, he would have done so over the previous 2 years when he was first handed the case. Instead, he sat on it and did nothing. In fact, he did even worse than nothing -- he stalled a U.K. investigation into the matter for a year until the U.K. had to unfreeze 23 million of Zlochevsky's assets because Shokin refused to cooperate with them.

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

Bullshit. The record shows he refused to cooperate with the U.K., who actually was investigating Zlochevsky. Initially, the U.K. froze over $23m of his assets, but then a U.K. court unfroze them after a year of being scuttled by Shokin.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.



​

the documents provided in my link say otherwise,,,and they are government documents not some opinion article,,,

Liar. I just posted a link to a news article stating exactly what I said. Your videos don't put a dent in it.

its the documents not the video dumbass,,,
your article is opinion

The links you posted to me were of videos, not documents.

And no, that article is news, not opinion.

 

[progressive hunter]

he did try to do it the previous 2 yrs,,,joe stepped in and got him fired for it,,,

Bullshit. The record shows he refused to cooperate with the U.K., who actually was investigating Zlochevsky. Initially, the U.K. froze over $23m of his assets, but then a U.K. court unfroze them after a year of being scuttled by Shokin.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.



​

the documents provided in my link say otherwise,,,and they are government documents not some opinion article,,,

Liar. I just posted a link to a news article stating exactly what I said. Your videos don't put a dent in it.

its the documents not the video dumbass,,,
your article is opinion

The links you posted to me were of videos, not documents.

And no, that article is news, not opinion.

and I told you all the supporting links were in the description of the video,,,


you want me to walk you through it send me a credit cARD NUMBER FIRST,,,i dont work for free

 

[Faun]

Bullshit. The record shows he refused to cooperate with the U.K., who actually was investigating Zlochevsky. Initially, the U.K. froze over $23m of his assets, but then a U.K. court unfroze them after a year of being scuttled by Shokin.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a December 2014 letter, U.S. officials warned Ukrainian prosecutors of negative consequences for Ukraine over its failure to assist the U.K., which had seized Zlochevsky’s assets, according to the documents.

Those funds, $23.5 million, were unblocked in 2015 when a British court determined there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the continued freeze, in part because Ukrainian prosecutors had failed to provide the necessary information.



​

the documents provided in my link say otherwise,,,and they are government documents not some opinion article,,,

Liar. I just posted a link to a news article stating exactly what I said. Your videos don't put a dent in it.

its the documents not the video dumbass,,,
your article is opinion

The links you posted to me were of videos, not documents.

And no, that article is news, not opinion.

and I told you all the supporting links were in the description of the video,,,


you want me to walk you through it send me a credit cARD NUMBER FIRST,,,i dont work for free

Your links went to videos, not documents. I highly recommend you learn the difference.

Regardless, I did post a link to a news article. It really doesn't matter to me if you choose to ignore it.

Oh... and no, you didn't tell me there were links in the description. I just did a search on this thread with your name and "description" and this post of yours was the only hit.

Can you stop lying??