Hunter Biden

[struth]

That’s not what that means. Can not would mean not enough evidence. Would not means they didn’t feel like it was their place to indict a sitting president. So they passed it to the AG. If you read the report there was plenty there that could have been prosecuted. But it wasn’t acted on by Barr

It’s not his job to indict anyone that’s what a grand jury does

If he thought he could get an indict he would of said the president committed a crime..instead he said he would not be able to do that

This is different then the xiden criminal probe where they concluded he did commit a crime but was too senile to prosecute

 

[Slade3200]

Well no Clinton took hammers to phones to hide evidences

Trump fired a corrupt fbi director that covered for her and attempted a coup

Not the same thing

True, not the same thing. But also reality is not as you paint it with your partisan spin

 

[struth]

True, not the same thing. But also reality is not as you paint it with your partisan spin

Correct I didn’t paint the facts they just are the facts

 

[Slade3200]

Well the people who had the evidence weren't sure they could prove it.

Let that sink in.

It wasn’t for mueller to take to court. It was for the AG. Barr swept it under the rug.

 

[Slade3200]

Congressional testimony is slated to begin.

Wonderful. More grandstanding. Perfect distraction from trumps blunders. He always needs a boogey man

 

[Slade3200]

It’s not his job to indict anyone that’s what a grand jury does

If he thought he could get an indict he would of said the president committed a crime..instead he said he would not be able to do that

This is different then the xiden criminal probe where they concluded he did commit a crime but was too senile to prosecute

Barr was of the mindset that presidents can’t commit crimes. Are you too?

 

[Slade3200]

Correct I didn’t paint the facts they just are the facts

Correct. Facts are the facts. You painted a partisan spin narrative. Not the facts

 

[struth]

Correct. Facts are the facts. You painted a partisan spin narrative. Not the facts

Nope I just stated facts

 

[Delldude]

It wasn’t for mueller to take to court.

His findings are what the AG goes with.....and Muellers investigators weren't convinced they could prove OJ.....the AG would be acutely aware of that.

Wonderful. More grandstanding. Perfect distraction from trumps blunders. He always needs a boogey man

Look at you.......right after accusing someone of partisan spin.....

 

[Slade3200]

Nope I just stated facts

You compared two cherry picked things that do not represent the entirety of the situation we are speaking about. That’s not stating facts. That’s being misleading and dishonest

 

[Slade3200]

His findings are what the AG goes with.....and Muellers investigators weren't convinced they could prove OJ.....the AG would be acutely aware of that.

The AG was of the mindset that the president couldn’t commit crimes because he was the president. So even if the proof and evidence was clear as day he still wasn’t going to indict the guy that appointed him AG.

 

[Slade3200]

His findings are what the AG goes with.....and Muellers investigators weren't convinced they could prove OJ.....the AG would be acutely aware of that.


Look at you.......right after accusing someone of partisan spin.....

What do you think I’m spinning? How long are yall gonna drag thing out for it’s been going on for like 6 years now

 

[Delldude]

How long are yall gonna drag thing out for it’s been going on for like 6 years now

Yet here you still are, dragging it out.

So even if the proof and evidence was clear as day he still wasn’t going to indict the guy that appointed him AG.

The evidence didn't support the clear possibility of a conviction and the AG knew that.

In a similar fashion that an old senile guy wasn't worth going after.

 

[struth]

You compared two cherry picked things that do not represent the entirety of the situation we are speaking about. That’s not stating facts. That’s being misleading and dishonest

What did I say that wasn’t fact?? I was giving an example of obstruction.

 

[Blisterfinger]

That’s not a deflection at all, it’s my whole point. You dishonestly pretend that Biden was working a personal agenda when he was executing an objective that was called for by our congress and by our president and by our allies. They all wanted this guy out because he was corrupt. Nothing to do with Hunter Biden

There are conflicting reports about shokin. Biden was receiving butt loads of money from the Ukrainian Energy company and many other places at the time. Biden has also been shown to be extremely dishonest . I'm going to air on the side of honesty and integrity which shows Biden was a crook. You can be fooled if you want, I really don't care, just proves that you are a fool. I've known that all along however.

"At the time he was removed, Shokin was investigating the corrupt energy company Burisma that was paying Biden’s son Hunter $1 million a year to sit on its board.

Shokin’s office issued a warrant to seize all of Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky’s properties in Kyiv on Feb. 2, 2016.

Hunter’s former business partner Devon Archer testified last month to the House Oversight Committee that Burisma added Hunter to its board so that “people would be intimidated to mess with them … legally.”

Shokin was “a threat” to Burisma, Archer told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

“He ended up seizing assets of [Zlochevsky] — a house, some cars, a couple properties. And [Zlochevsky] actually never went back to Ukraine after Shokin seized all of his assets.”

In an interview with The Post last month from his home in Kyiv, Shokin denied that he was corrupt and said he was fired illegally."

Despite Biden’s claim, Europeans WEREN’T trying to oust Ukraine prosecutor targeting Hunter’s firm

The European Commission praised Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin for his efforts to fight corruption in a December 2015 progress report published nine days after then-VP Joe Biden demande…

nypost.com

 

[Slade3200]

What did I say that wasn’t fact?? I was giving an example of obstruction.

You said Trump fired a corrupt fbi director like that was all that happened. First of all that’s your opinion. Second, you left out the actual elements of dishonesty and obstruction that was laid out in Mueller’s report and compared it to Hillary smashing phones, something I might add which isn’t illegal. So you werent being honest

 

[Slade3200]

There are conflicting reports about shokin.

No mo you don’t get to use that lazy dismissal. There was a memo written by our Congress calling for reforms to his office because of corruption. Same with foreign leaders. Those claims had nothing to do with Hunter Biden and that’s why Biden was tasked to do what he did

 

[struth]

You said Trump fired a corrupt fbi director like that was all that happened. First of all that’s your opinion. Second, you left out the actual elements of dishonesty and obstruction that was laid out in Mueller’s report and compared it to Hillary smashing phones, something I might add which isn’t illegal. So you werent being honest

That is all that happened that’s what started the mueller probe

Mueller didn’t say there was obstruction

You don’t think it’s illegal to destroy evidence? What do you think obstruction of justice is?

 

[Blisterfinger]

No mo you don’t get to use that lazy dismissal. There was a memo written by our Congress calling for reforms to his office because of corruption. Same with foreign leaders. Those claims had nothing to do with Hunter Biden and that’s why Biden was tasked to do what he did

You've been fooled Slade. You seem to buy everything Biden says hook line and sinker.

At the time he was removed, Shokin was investigating the corrupt energy company Burisma that was paying Biden’s son Hunter $1 million a year to sit on its board.

Shokin’s office issued a warrant to seize all of Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky’s properties in Kyiv on Feb. 2, 2016.

Hunter’s former business partner Devon Archer testified last month to the House Oversight Committee that Burisma added Hunter to its board so that “people would be intimidated to mess with them … legally.”

Shokin was “a threat” to Burisma, Archer told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

“He ended up seizing assets of [Zlochevsky] — a house, some cars, a couple properties. And [Zlochevsky] actually never went back to Ukraine after Shokin seized all of his assets.”

In an interview with The Post last month from his home in Kyiv, Shokin denied that he was corrupt and said he was fired illegally.

 

[Slade3200]

That is all that happened that’s what started the mueller probe

Mueller didn’t say there was obstruction

You don’t think it’s illegal to destroy evidence? What do you think obstruction of justice is?

Trump and cos continuous lies are what started the probe… the probe that his own people started. That’s how Stinky the whole thing smelled