Hulk Hogan ripped me off and used the phrase “real Americans” over and over again…Does that phrase piss off Democrats?

The First Temple predates 500 BC and Archeological finds with Proto Hebrew Writing predates the Babylonians , Greeks ,Romans ,Dark Ages ,Ottomans …

Carrying around little boxes with scraps of a Hebrew scroll inside with a shady claim to land ownership in it from <insert preferred date here> does not give you the right to that land today.
 
Is the assertion that “real Americans” tend to be Republicans while Anti or Un-Americans are Democrats?
Have/do Democrats embrace the notion that they are unconventional Americans?


Of course not. Democrats are real Americans.

Republicans are traitors and seditionists that sell out their country to our enemies.
 
I don't care about what wishy washy bullshit you say after you admit injustice was done and injustice is owed.

i said I think something should be done to help, that doesn’t mean people should just acquiesce to any version of that idea. It’s a complex issue and depending on how much is proposed can change the validity of it. This is why I’m asking you for a number, because if someone says yes they are due something then you come out and say “10 million each”…well that changes things, and there are other questions that have to be answered along with that.
 
Oh yeah?

So, how about laws saying corporations can't buy houses in residential areas?

Or federal rent controls?
Huh? What does that have to do with people having equal access to buy a home? I’m not saying the government should buy it for them, just that if they qualify for a home, there should be no extra burden upon them in the process
 
i said I think something should be done to help, that doesn’t mean people should just acquiesce to any version of that idea. It’s a complex issue and depending on how much is proposed can change the validity of it. This is why I’m asking you for a number, because if someone says yes they are due something then you come out and say “10 million each”…well that changes things, and there are other questions that have to be answered along with that.
I'm not asking you if people in need should be helped. This isn't charity. I'm asking you, regardless of price, should people be made whole for the injustice that they suffered? Yes or no? Because then the question isn't about the price tag, it's about what the damage was.
 
I'm not asking you if people in need should be helped. This isn't charity. I'm asking you, regardless of price, should people be made whole for the injustice that they suffered? Yes or no? Because then the question isn't about the price tag, it's about what the damage was.

The question is the price tag, who gets it, for how long, what ELSE will they get.

I agree that they need restitution, but not “regardless of price”, again, there’s a lot that goes with it.

Depending on the package, who is eligible and how much can change the discussion
 

Forum List

Back
Top