See how these AGW cult members prove they do not care about the environment.
Even if solar panels covered the entire desert it still would not replace fossil fuels..
OK, figures on the power output by burning coal and oil, compared to the amount of desert land and the output of present solar farms.
New Scientist Environment Blog Just how much land does solar power need - New Scientist
Well they are both off, but Ausubel is way, way off. If we assume a 1000 MWe electrical generation plant, and we assume it runs 24/7 for the entire year (no down time), then that plant will generate about 8.8 billion kilowatthours per year. So we need to calculate the size of a PV array that will generate the same kW-hrs.
Assuming the average US solar resource of 1800 kW-hr/m2-year [how much the sun shines] and a PV system efficiency of 10%, one square meter of PV would generate about 180 kW-hr/year. Therefore you would need about 48.7 million sq meters or 48.7 square kilometers. That?s 18.8 square miles.
For the sunny southwest, we have a yearly average solar resource of 2300 kWh/m2. Again assuming a 10% PV system efficiency, then that would produce about 230 kWh/m2-year. So for this array, you would need 38 million sq meters or 38 sq km. That is 14.7 square miles.
This is why it is so very important to be correct with the numbers - the future of our society depends on energy and we need to get this right! Also, PV has not been stagnating - current panel efficiency is running close to 15%, which will of course reduce those areas.
There are about 200,000 square miles of desert in the US.
Deserts of the World
Pretty easy to see that would be a lot of power. Consider that they are playing with some thin film panels that produce 40% in the lab, and there are other materials they are working on that have a theoritical limit of 60%. Solar is a winner.