How TV murderer was reprimanded for wearing an Obama badge to report on elections

[JoeB131]

Yes...the Jews didn't need guns, and 6 million died in the death camps.

Other European citizens didn't need guns, another 6 million, were also sent to the death camps.

Yes, because handguns do a shitload of good against TANKS.

The Rwandan's didn't need guns....and 800,000 were butchered with machets by their government and their rival tribes...while soldiers from the Western powers stood and watched and did nothing.

actually, both sides were very well armed. One side just LOST. Guy, here's the reality. If the government decides you are enough of a pain in the ass you need to die. you are going to die. Every ******* time.

The Mexicans across our border, they don't need guns, as they are murdered in their thousands by the government and drug cartels working together.....

Yeah, well here's the thing. Mexico has a second Amendment, just like ours. They also have American gun stores that sell a quarter million guns to the cartels every year.

Guy, you are really a stupid person, aren't you? Guns aren't going to protect you from the government or the Zombie Apocalypse or criminals or any of the other fantasies you have.

 

[2aguy]

Yes...the Jews didn't need guns, and 6 million died in the death camps.

Other European citizens didn't need guns, another 6 million, were also sent to the death camps.

Yes, because handguns do a shitload of good against TANKS.

The Rwandan's didn't need guns....and 800,000 were butchered with machets by their government and their rival tribes...while soldiers from the Western powers stood and watched and did nothing.

actually, both sides were very well armed. One side just LOST. Guy, here's the reality. If the government decides you are enough of a pain in the ass you need to die. you are going to die. Every ******* time.

The Mexicans across our border, they don't need guns, as they are murdered in their thousands by the government and drug cartels working together.....

Yeah, well here's the thing. Mexico has a second Amendment, just like ours. They also have American gun stores that sell a quarter million guns to the cartels every year.

Guy, you are really a stupid person, aren't you? Guns aren't going to protect you from the government or the Zombie Apocalypse or criminals or any of the other fantasies you have.

We saw what happens when populations are disarmed and their government decides to murder them…death in the millions….how about next time we see what happens when several hundred thousand citizens are armed with small arms…….see joe……we just left 2 countries called Iraq and Afghanistan, because we got tired of fighting small, poorly armed fighters even though we had tanks, jets, Navy Seal, Green Berets, satellites, and the best combat troops in the world….so yeah…it makes a big difference if a vast portion of the population is armed and ready to fight.

The Swiss kept hiller from invading because they had so many armed citizens….and yes…that was why because he rolled over all the other disarmed countries in Europe, Poland, Norway, Belgium, France,…..because their citizens were disarmed after WW1…..

And no….the Rwandans did not have an equal fight, most deaths were by being hacked to death by machete, while U.N. troops actually watched and did nothing to stop it even though that is the very reason they were there……

Mexico does not have a 2nd Amendment just like us, their civilians are disarmed since the government gets to decide who gets guns…just like you nuts here want to do. And the government agents and drug cartels work together to rape, torture and murder thousands of unarmed Mexican citizens every year….and right on our border too…..

Yes…..Mexican government officials sell guns to the cartels…but not citizens.

Mexicans get their guns from Europe and China…..and from their own military who take the guns the American government gives to the Mexican military, and they sell them to the cartels….



again….the law abiding Mexican citizen can't get a gun….the criminals murdering them get them easily.

 

[JoeB131]

Too m uch sniffing of gun grease makes you into a retard apparently.

We saw what happens when populations are disarmed and their government decides to murder them…death in the millions….how about next time we see what happens when several hundred thousand citizens are armed with small arms

They get slaughtered just as effectively. The problem you have is you think the countries Hitler invaded were disarmed. There were plenty of weapons. They didn't do jack shit good against an armed enemy.

.see joe……we just left 2 countries called Iraq and Afghanistan, because we got tired of fighting small, poorly armed fighters even though we had tanks, jets, Navy Seal, Green Berets, satellites, and the best combat troops in the world….so yeah…it makes a big difference if a vast portion of the population is armed and ready to fight.

Okay, let's look at that. The Iraqis killed 5000 of us. We killed possibly up to a million of them and the killing has gone on after we've left. Maybe, just maybe, we'd have been better off disarming the Iraqis. But Bush didn't ever want to tell his NRA backers disarming ANYONE was a good idea.

The Swiss kept hiller from invading because they had so many armed citizens….and yes…that was why because he rolled over all the other disarmed countries in Europe, Poland, Norway, Belgium, France,…..because their citizens were disarmed after WW1…..

Except nothing like that happened. Hitler didn't invade Switzerland bcause Switzerland was NEUTRAL. Same reason they didn't invade Sweden. Point was, there were plenty of guns in the countries he did overrun.

And no….the Rwandans did not have an equal fight, most deaths were by being hacked to death by machete, while U.N. troops actually watched and did nothing to stop it even though that is the very reason they were there……

yeah, yeah their job was not to stop a civil war both sides wanted to fight. You probably can't tell me the difference between the Hutus and the Tutsis without looking it up.

Mexico does not have a 2nd Amendment just like us, their civilians are disarmed since the government gets to decide who gets guns…just like you nuts here want to do. And the government agents and drug cartels work together to rape, torture and murder thousands of unarmed Mexican citizens every year….and right on our border too…..

Guy, you are going on this rant about Mexico, but most of what is going on in Mexico is our fault.

We buy the drugs. We sell them the guns.

 

[2aguy]

Too m uch sniffing of gun grease makes you into a retard apparently.

We saw what happens when populations are disarmed and their government decides to murder them…death in the millions….how about next time we see what happens when several hundred thousand citizens are armed with small arms

They get slaughtered just as effectively. The problem you have is you think the countries Hitler invaded were disarmed. There were plenty of weapons. They didn't do jack shit good against an armed enemy.

.see joe……we just left 2 countries called Iraq and Afghanistan, because we got tired of fighting small, poorly armed fighters even though we had tanks, jets, Navy Seal, Green Berets, satellites, and the best combat troops in the world….so yeah…it makes a big difference if a vast portion of the population is armed and ready to fight.

Okay, let's look at that. The Iraqis killed 5000 of us. We killed possibly up to a million of them and the killing has gone on after we've left. Maybe, just maybe, we'd have been better off disarming the Iraqis. But Bush didn't ever want to tell his NRA backers disarming ANYONE was a good idea.

The Swiss kept hiller from invading because they had so many armed citizens….and yes…that was why because he rolled over all the other disarmed countries in Europe, Poland, Norway, Belgium, France,…..because their citizens were disarmed after WW1…..

Except nothing like that happened. Hitler didn't invade Switzerland bcause Switzerland was NEUTRAL. Same reason they didn't invade Sweden. Point was, there were plenty of guns in the countries he did overrun.

And no….the Rwandans did not have an equal fight, most deaths were by being hacked to death by machete, while U.N. troops actually watched and did nothing to stop it even though that is the very reason they were there……

yeah, yeah their job was not to stop a civil war both sides wanted to fight. You probably can't tell me the difference between the Hutus and the Tutsis without looking it up.

Mexico does not have a 2nd Amendment just like us, their civilians are disarmed since the government gets to decide who gets guns…just like you nuts here want to do. And the government agents and drug cartels work together to rape, torture and murder thousands of unarmed Mexican citizens every year….and right on our border too…..

Guy, you are going on this rant about Mexico, but most of what is going on in Mexico is our fault.

We buy the drugs. We sell them the guns.

Wow...you are still stupid...the people of Europe were disarmed, only their militaries were armed...ever see the viedo by the Norwegian General, "Why I chose the gun?"

Switzerland...neutral...kept Hitler out.....are you really that ******* stupid...yes you are. The reason hitler left Switzerland alone is they had over 400,000 armed civilians ready to fight. the other countries, Norway, Belgium, Poland....didn't have armed civilian populations.

And explain again how lightly armed terrorists fought us again...with small arms and land mines....with our tanks, jets, satellites, missles and Elite forces.......

The unarmed civilians in Mexico don't get the guns do they, the military and the drug cartels get the guns...with the military selling the guns to the drug cartels...and working with the drug cartels......

 

[2aguy]

Hitler invaded and occupied all of these countries and murdered their citizens in death camps...and then he decided to honor Switzerland's neutrality......you are stupid...

Which Countries did the Nazis occupy? - Key Stage 3 - The Holocaust Explained

This is why he didn't attack Switzerland....and marched all over the other unarmed countries...

THE SWISS WERE PREPARED TO FIGHT FACISM TO THE BITTER END | FRONTLINE | PBS

The other European nations were easily toppled and had little means to wage a partisan war against the occupation. Once their standing armies were defeated, the governments capitulated and the populaces were defenseless.



Only in Switzerland was the entire populace armed and prepared to wage a relentless guerrilla war against an invader. When the war began in 1939, Switzerland mobilized 435,000 citizen soldiers out of a population of 4.2 million. Production figures for Swiss service rifles, which had firepower equal to those of the Germans, demonstrate an ample supply of small arms. Swiss militiamen were instructed to disregard any alleged "official" surrender as enemy propaganda and, if necessary, to fight individually. This meant that a nation of sharpshooters would be sniping at German soldiers at long ranges from every mountain.

 

[theliq]

Okay I'll give that "Imperial rule" in the literal term, isn't a good way to put it - but the people were under the full control of their feudal lords, their daimyo, and other terms, from almost the beginning. One of them won and became the Emperor, thus "uniting" them and ruling over all the daimyo's somewhere around the 1600's yea, but my point was not the term, but rather how they've lived - being under "Feudal" rule has no more "rights" and "freedoms" than being under "Imperial" rule. For the average person nothing changed between the rule of a diamyo and having an emperor, they still lived under their diamyo's thumb; they submitted to someone being in power.

I'm going to cut you off here because you are just massacring Japanese history. Next you'll be telling me Godzilla movies are documentaries.

IN short, Japan has always had an Emperor (Tenyo) who held spiritual power and was held to be the descendent of the Sun Goddess, Amaterasu. The real power was held by first Daimyo and then by a Shogun.

Nothing of which has all that much to do with why they don't have our crime rates. They don't have our crime rates because they don't let every asshole who wants one have a gun. It's really, really, really that ******* simple.

Seriously, every other industrialized country has figured this out. Citizens don't need guns. You take them away from citizens, criminals can't get them, either.

Citizens don't need guns.

Yes...the Jews didn't need guns, and 6 million died in the death camps.

Other European citizens didn't need guns, another 6 million, were also sent to the death camps.

The Armenians...didn't need guns either.....and they had the Armenian genocide.

The Rwandan's didn't need guns....and 800,000 were butchered with machets by their government and their rival tribes...while soldiers from the Western powers stood and watched and did nothing.

The Mexicans across our border, they don't need guns, as they are murdered in their thousands by the government and drug cartels working together.....

So many law abiding people didn't need guns....and were slaughtered.....you're right joe...the people who slaughtered them didn't think they needed guns......

The Russians didn't need guns, and Stalin murdered 25 million of them.

The Chinese didn't need guns, and Mao murdered 70 million of them.

The Cambodians didn't need guns and 1/3 of their population was slaughtered by pol pot.

The Okinawans, Phillipinos, and Chinese, and all the other people invaded and conquered by Imperial Japan didn't need guns....and they were also slaughtered......

But I note with Great Disatisfaction..You do not mention the killings by the US in pre-emptive strikes and Wars they have been in Every Year since the American Civil War..............How Many Millions I wonder......NO 2aguy,your Summation above is flawed and your idiocy regarding the murderous invasion by Japan in 1935 into China where they slaughtered MILLIONS and Japans Antics in WW2 make you a Baffoon indeed.....your grasp of history is Bias and Ignorant to say the least......Ho Hum another Dumb,Dumb.steve

 

[JoeB131]

Hitler invaded and occupied all of these countries and murdered their citizens in death camps...and then he decided to honor Switzerland's neutrality......you are stupid

No, guy, you are.

No one attacked Switzerland in WWI. there was no value in invading Switzerland. He also didn't invade Turkey, Spain, or Sweden.

Here was the thing. EVERY country Hitler invaded, he had a good reason to invade. (At least in a tactical sense) Norway was invaded to safeguard metal ore shipments. Everyone forgets the Allies tried to invade Norway first. the Low countries were invaded to get around the Maginot Line. Greece was invaded because they had defeated the Italians. Yugoslavia was invaded because a pro-Axis government was overthrown, and Hitler just got tired of dicking with these people.

Most of these countries had some private gun ownership. I mean, no one had the kind of Nancy Lanza Prepping for the Zombie Apocalypse level of gun ownership we have in this country. That's ffucking crazy. But the notion that these countries were "unarmed" was just silly.

Most of these people looked at their hunting rifle, then looked at the Panzer rolling down the street and said to themselves, "Shit, the Jews live down the block."

 

[2aguy]

Okay I'll give that "Imperial rule" in the literal term, isn't a good way to put it - but the people were under the full control of their feudal lords, their daimyo, and other terms, from almost the beginning. One of them won and became the Emperor, thus "uniting" them and ruling over all the daimyo's somewhere around the 1600's yea, but my point was not the term, but rather how they've lived - being under "Feudal" rule has no more "rights" and "freedoms" than being under "Imperial" rule. For the average person nothing changed between the rule of a diamyo and having an emperor, they still lived under their diamyo's thumb; they submitted to someone being in power.

I'm going to cut you off here because you are just massacring Japanese history. Next you'll be telling me Godzilla movies are documentaries.

IN short, Japan has always had an Emperor (Tenyo) who held spiritual power and was held to be the descendent of the Sun Goddess, Amaterasu. The real power was held by first Daimyo and then by a Shogun.

Nothing of which has all that much to do with why they don't have our crime rates. They don't have our crime rates because they don't let every asshole who wants one have a gun. It's really, really, really that ******* simple.

Seriously, every other industrialized country has figured this out. Citizens don't need guns. You take them away from citizens, criminals can't get them, either.

Citizens don't need guns.

Yes...the Jews didn't need guns, and 6 million died in the death camps.

Other European citizens didn't need guns, another 6 million, were also sent to the death camps.

The Armenians...didn't need guns either.....and they had the Armenian genocide.

The Rwandan's didn't need guns....and 800,000 were butchered with machets by their government and their rival tribes...while soldiers from the Western powers stood and watched and did nothing.

The Mexicans across our border, they don't need guns, as they are murdered in their thousands by the government and drug cartels working together.....

So many law abiding people didn't need guns....and were slaughtered.....you're right joe...the people who slaughtered them didn't think they needed guns......

The Russians didn't need guns, and Stalin murdered 25 million of them.

The Chinese didn't need guns, and Mao murdered 70 million of them.

The Cambodians didn't need guns and 1/3 of their population was slaughtered by pol pot.

The Okinawans, Phillipinos, and Chinese, and all the other people invaded and conquered by Imperial Japan didn't need guns....and they were also slaughtered......

But I note with Great Disatisfaction..You do not mention the killings by the US in pre-emptive strikes and Wars they have been in Every Year since the American Civil War..............How Many Millions I wonder......NO 2aguy,your Summation above is flawed and your idiocy regarding the murderous invasion by Japan in 1935 into China where they slaughtered MILLIONS and Japans Antics in WW2 make you a Baffoon indeed.....your grasp of history is Bias and Ignorant to say the least......Ho Hum another Dumb,Dumb.steve

allow me to retort…**** you.

 

[theliq]

Okay I'll give that "Imperial rule" in the literal term, isn't a good way to put it - but the people were under the full control of their feudal lords, their daimyo, and other terms, from almost the beginning. One of them won and became the Emperor, thus "uniting" them and ruling over all the daimyo's somewhere around the 1600's yea, but my point was not the term, but rather how they've lived - being under "Feudal" rule has no more "rights" and "freedoms" than being under "Imperial" rule. For the average person nothing changed between the rule of a diamyo and having an emperor, they still lived under their diamyo's thumb; they submitted to someone being in power.

I'm going to cut you off here because you are just massacring Japanese history. Next you'll be telling me Godzilla movies are documentaries.

IN short, Japan has always had an Emperor (Tenyo) who held spiritual power and was held to be the descendent of the Sun Goddess, Amaterasu. The real power was held by first Daimyo and then by a Shogun.

Nothing of which has all that much to do with why they don't have our crime rates. They don't have our crime rates because they don't let every asshole who wants one have a gun. It's really, really, really that ******* simple.

Seriously, every other industrialized country has figured this out. Citizens don't need guns. You take them away from citizens, criminals can't get them, either.

Citizens don't need guns.

Yes...the Jews didn't need guns, and 6 million died in the death camps.

Other European citizens didn't need guns, another 6 million, were also sent to the death camps.

The Armenians...didn't need guns either.....and they had the Armenian genocide.

The Rwandan's didn't need guns....and 800,000 were butchered with machets by their government and their rival tribes...while soldiers from the Western powers stood and watched and did nothing.

The Mexicans across our border, they don't need guns, as they are murdered in their thousands by the government and drug cartels working together.....

So many law abiding people didn't need guns....and were slaughtered.....you're right joe...the people who slaughtered them didn't think they needed guns......

The Russians didn't need guns, and Stalin murdered 25 million of them.

The Chinese didn't need guns, and Mao murdered 70 million of them.

The Cambodians didn't need guns and 1/3 of their population was slaughtered by pol pot.

The Okinawans, Phillipinos, and Chinese, and all the other people invaded and conquered by Imperial Japan didn't need guns....and they were also slaughtered......

But I note with Great Disatisfaction..You do not mention the killings by the US in pre-emptive strikes and Wars they have been in Every Year since the American Civil War..............How Many Millions I wonder......NO 2aguy,your Summation above is flawed and your idiocy regarding the murderous invasion by Japan in 1935 into China where they slaughtered MILLIONS and Japans Antics in WW2 make you a Baffoon indeed.....your grasp of history is Bias and Ignorant to say the least......Ho Hum another Dumb,Dumb.steve

allow me to retort…**** you.

Retort all you like Dumb,Dumb, the fact is you have nothing intelligent to say..........I kicked your Ass because I can and do,Now answer the questions posed to you......you Can't Because YOU are insane.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[theliq]

Trust you and the family are well Vig..steve

 

[Vigilante]

Trust you and the family are well Vig..steve

Just ducky, Steve, how's the winter down there?

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Well you didn't expect him to be anything else, now the proof he was a ******* Obuma DemocRAT!

dailymail.co.uk ^ | 8/27/2015 | Ben Ashford
Warped TV reporter Vester Lee Flanagan exasperated bosses with his 'stiff and nervous' delivery, his inability to use a teleprompter - and by wearing a President Obama badge during an election report, Daily Mail Online can reveal. Management at WDBJ dubbed the failed newsman the 'human tape recorder' because he frequently parroted what interviewees had told him rather than doing his own journalism. Flanagan, 41, clashed repeatedly with photojournalists, belittling them in public and intimidating them with his violent temper, according to internal reports. He was also censured for wearing an Obama sticker while recording a segment at a polling...

And.......
did you notice that that so-called Liberal News Station fired him for his partiality?

Wrong. They fired him because he was a whiny ass liberal troublemaker who complained about everything

 

[JoeB131]

Someone needs to tell this Uncle Tom it doesn't scrub off.

 

[Vigilante]

Someone needs to tell this Uncle Tom it doesn't scrub off.

Someone needs to ***** slap you, RACIST SCUMBAG.... I guess a light weight liberal, such as yourself, NEEDS to read a GREAT LIBERALS HONEST WORK on the "NEGRO FAMILY".... here, you don't need to thank me!...Liberals NEVER thank someone that corrects them! 50 years ago LIBERALS actually pointed out problems and tried to fix them, unlike today where LIBERALS CAUSE PROBLEMS and try to divide the country!

1965 Moynihan Report - Revisited |

 

[bodecea]

Well you didn't expect him to be anything else, now the proof he was a ******* Obuma DemocRAT!

dailymail.co.uk ^ | 8/27/2015 | Ben Ashford
Warped TV reporter Vester Lee Flanagan exasperated bosses with his 'stiff and nervous' delivery, his inability to use a teleprompter - and by wearing a President Obama badge during an election report, Daily Mail Online can reveal. Management at WDBJ dubbed the failed newsman the 'human tape recorder' because he frequently parroted what interviewees had told him rather than doing his own journalism. Flanagan, 41, clashed repeatedly with photojournalists, belittling them in public and intimidating them with his violent temper, according to internal reports. He was also censured for wearing an Obama sticker while recording a segment at a polling...

And.......
did you notice that that so-called Liberal News Station fired him for his partiality?

Sunshine. that wasn't the reason this evil cock sucker got fired.
The fact is he was not able to even do the bare minimum to keep his job...

And...if you were paying attention, that was one of the indicators that he wasn't doing his job.

 

[JoeB131]

Someone needs to ***** slap you, RACIST SCUMBAG.... I guess a light weight liberal, such as yourself, NEEDS to read a GREAT LIBERALS HONEST WORK on the "NEGRO FAMILY".... here, you don't need to thank me!...Liberals NEVER thank someone that corrects them! 50 years ago LIBERALS actually pointed out problems and tried to fix them, unlike today where LIBERALS CAUSE PROBLEMS and try to divide the country!

Ohh, look everyone, it's another....

Okay, let's get real. The problem is you racists are still racist. Just because you can find an Uncle Tom to validate your views, doesn't make them less racist.

 

[Vigilante]

Someone needs to ***** slap you, RACIST SCUMBAG.... I guess a light weight liberal, such as yourself, NEEDS to read a GREAT LIBERALS HONEST WORK on the "NEGRO FAMILY".... here, you don't need to thank me!...Liberals NEVER thank someone that corrects them! 50 years ago LIBERALS actually pointed out problems and tried to fix them, unlike today where LIBERALS CAUSE PROBLEMS and try to divide the country!

Ohh, look everyone, it's another....

Okay, let's get real. The problem is you racists are still racist. Just because you can find an Uncle Tom to validate your views, doesn't make them less racist.

Any Black that doesn't spout the LIES of DemocRATS, such as yourself ,is automatically an Uncle Tom and you are still a RACIST POS!

 

[JoeB131]

Any Black that doesn't spout the LIES of DemocRATS, such as yourself ,is automatically an Uncle Tom and you are still a RACIST POS!

Sorry, dude, I'm white.

And not crazy like you are.

But that Sheriff is still an Uncle Tom.