How trade deficits reduce their nation’s annual GDPs and numbers of jobs.

[Toddsterpatriot]

GDP will never rise without more immigrants.

Boot the illegals.

 

[Supposn]

GDP will never rise without more immigrants.

Deanrd, never again say never; again, never!

GDP is much less meaningful if it’s not GDP per capita.

Are you stating that if the USA immediately receives another 8 million additional immigrants tonight, our GDP per capita will immediately improve?
The number of immigrants rather than our increasing college graduates per capita are of greater benefit to our economy? What about increasing our exports and decreasing our chronic trade deficits? would improving our health help?

Supposn

 

[anotherlife]

Yes, monopolies are free to form. .

if so why did you forget to name one????

Because I don't want the discussion to degenerate into picking on like one thing, but everyone knows at least 20 names or so.

 

[anotherlife]

Worldwide? We were talking about the u.s. .

too stupid!! you said there was full consolidation when there are 30 million corporations in America and 100 million in the globalized world!!! Have you no shame??

Just because you have 30 million S type corporations, which is bullshit in a country of only 200 million, you have nothing about the C type corporations. Hehehe.

 

[anotherlife]

Quality of service per price is nose diving in every u.s. Industry, that is not a secret.

its a stupid liberal lie which you cant prove!!. If true thanks to capitalism it would mean opportunity for new competition. and if true Iphones would be getting worse not better over time!!!

App development, like game development, is a new industry, on its way to consolidate. What I said was that quality is going down and prices are going up. The best example is food, but all services fall into this trend too. To stick with gadgets though, count how many ISP's you had like 20 years ago and how many you have today. A large drop.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Quality of service per price is nose diving in every u.s. Industry, that is not a secret.

its a stupid liberal lie which you cant prove!!. If true thanks to capitalism it would mean opportunity for new competition. and if true Iphones would be getting worse not better over time!!!

App development, like game development, is a new industry, on its way to consolidate. What I said was that quality is going down and prices are going up. The best example is food, but all services fall into this trend too. To stick with gadgets though, count how many ISP's you had like 20 years ago and how many you have today. A large drop.

Totally stupid and liberal of course 20 years ago we had no iPhones today hundred million Americans have iPhones we are evolving towards the future not back towards the Stone Age you cannot be dumber

 

[anotherlife]

Quality of service per price is nose diving in every u.s. Industry, that is not a secret.

its a stupid liberal lie which you cant prove!!. If true thanks to capitalism it would mean opportunity for new competition. and if true Iphones would be getting worse not better over time!!!

App development, like game development, is a new industry, on its way to consolidate. What I said was that quality is going down and prices are going up. The best example is food, but all services fall into this trend too. To stick with gadgets though, count how many ISP's you had like 20 years ago and how many you have today. A large drop.

Totally stupid and liberal of course 20 years ago we had no iPhones today hundred million Americans have iPhones we are evolving towards the future not back towards the Stone Age you cannot be dumber

But your blind ideology can't explain how these innovations were made, and how innovation dynamics works in transitional and consolidated economies.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Quality of service per price is nose diving in every u.s. Industry, that is not a secret.

its a stupid liberal lie which you cant prove!!. If true thanks to capitalism it would mean opportunity for new competition. and if true Iphones would be getting worse not better over time!!!

App development, like game development, is a new industry, on its way to consolidate. What I said was that quality is going down and prices are going up. The best example is food, but all services fall into this trend too. To stick with gadgets though, count how many ISP's you had like 20 years ago and how many you have today. A large drop.

Totally stupid and liberal of course 20 years ago we had no iPhones today hundred million Americans have iPhones we are evolving towards the future not back towards the Stone Age you cannot be dumber

But your blind ideology can't explain how these innovations were made, and how innovation dynamics works in transitional and consolidated economies.

The inventions were made through entrepreneurial activity in a largely capitalist economy. Next?

 

[anotherlife]

Quality of service per price is nose diving in every u.s. Industry, that is not a secret.

its a stupid liberal lie which you cant prove!!. If true thanks to capitalism it would mean opportunity for new competition. and if true Iphones would be getting worse not better over time!!!

App development, like game development, is a new industry, on its way to consolidate. What I said was that quality is going down and prices are going up. The best example is food, but all services fall into this trend too. To stick with gadgets though, count how many ISP's you had like 20 years ago and how many you have today. A large drop.

Totally stupid and liberal of course 20 years ago we had no iPhones today hundred million Americans have iPhones we are evolving towards the future not back towards the Stone Age you cannot be dumber

But your blind ideology can't explain how these innovations were made, and how innovation dynamics works in transitional and consolidated economies.

The inventions were made through entrepreneurial activity in a largely capitalist economy. Next?

Nice quote from the church of capitalism. Bullshit. Next?

To answer the question, you would need to learn about the evolution of established monopolies, governments, and the interaction between them, like I hinted in a few earlier posts. Hehehe.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

its a stupid liberal lie which you cant prove!!. If true thanks to capitalism it would mean opportunity for new competition. and if true Iphones would be getting worse not better over time!!!

App development, like game development, is a new industry, on its way to consolidate. What I said was that quality is going down and prices are going up. The best example is food, but all services fall into this trend too. To stick with gadgets though, count how many ISP's you had like 20 years ago and how many you have today. A large drop.

Totally stupid and liberal of course 20 years ago we had no iPhones today hundred million Americans have iPhones we are evolving towards the future not back towards the Stone Age you cannot be dumber

But your blind ideology can't explain how these innovations were made, and how innovation dynamics works in transitional and consolidated economies.

The inventions were made through entrepreneurial activity in a largely capitalist economy. Next?

Nice quote from the church of capitalism. Bullshit. Next?

To answer the question, you would need to learn about the evolution of established monopolies, governments, and the interaction between them, like I hinted in a few earlier posts. Hehehe.

Very stupid as always since monopolies are illegal

 

[Supposn]

Very stupid as always since monopolies are illegal[/QUOTE]

Patents and copyrights:

Edward Baiamonte, is that similar to drug companies modifying their soon to be expiring patents of a drug. In many cases the modifications do not so much change the function or behavior of the drug, but rather enable the enterprise’s continuous benefits of their monopoly.
The purpose of the patent laws is for expediting innovation and dissemination of technology design by legally assuring the innovators of a monopoly for what was legally considered as a reasonable span of time.

RCA prospered by first using the leverage of their wealth to outbid others and accumulate sufficient patents regarding electronic devices. As they accumulated ownership of more patents, their dominance of the electronic industry grew stronger and it would be less profitable for any other enterprise to attempt competing with RCA.

For example, EVERY radio produced, REGARDLESS of what other enterprise produced it, and regardless of what then available technology was integral to the radio’s design, had to pay RCA royalties because RCA then owned some, if not every patent necessary to produce any radio marketable at that time.
If a patent holder attempted to exercise their own right to their own innovative patent, they were unable to manufacture a radio unless they paid RCA royalties due the RCA’s ownership of many, if not most other patents that were integral to radio’s designs at that time.

Similarly, no wealthy competing enterprise could afford to out-bid RCA for any new patents applicable to such electronic devices, because if they owned the patent, they would still have to pay RCA royalties to manufacture the devices.

Fortunately, there were two factors that diminished RCA’s stranglehold on electronics to some extent. Who knew when Theodore Roosevelt signed the first of the federal anti-trust laws, they would to some extent protect our nation from RCA. Additionally, during World War Two, the federal government didn’t care which corporation owned what patents. The Federal government rationed materials, then regulated USA production, and insisted that the government not be denied any goods or services that they considered to be needed.

Respectfully, Supposn

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Very stupid as always since monopolies are illegal

Patents and copyrights:

Edward Baiamonte, is that similar to drug companies modifying their soon to be expiring patents of a drug. In many cases the modifications do not so much change the function or behavior of the drug, but rather enable the enterprise’s continuous benefits of their monopoly.
The purpose of the patent laws is for expediting innovation and dissemination of technology design by legally assuring the innovators of a monopoly for what was legally considered as a reasonable span of time.

RCA prospered by first using the leverage of their wealth to outbid others and accumulate sufficient patents regarding electronic devices. As they accumulated ownership of more patents, their dominance of the electronic industry grew stronger and it would be less profitable for any other enterprise to attempt competing with RCA.

For example, EVERY radio produced, REGARDLESS of what other enterprise produced it, and regardless of what then available technology was integral to the radio’s design, had to pay RCA royalties because RCA then owned some, if not every patent necessary to produce any radio marketable at that time.
If a patent holder attempted to exercise their own right to their own innovative patent, they were unable to manufacture a radio unless they paid RCA royalties due the RCA’s ownership of many, if not most other patents that were integral to radio’s designs at that time.

Similarly, no wealthy competing enterprise could afford to out-bid RCA for any new patents applicable to such electronic devices, because if they owned the patent, they would still have to pay RCA royalties to manufacture the devices.

Fortunately, there were two factors that diminished RCA’s stranglehold on electronics to some extent. Who knew when Theodore Roosevelt signed the first of the federal anti-trust laws, they would to some extent protect our nation from RCA. Additionally, during World War Two, the federal government didn’t care which corporation owned what patents. The Federal government rationed materials, then regulated USA production, and insisted that the government not be denied any goods or services that they considered to be needed.

Respectfully, Supposn[/QUOTE]
Apparently the system is working extremely well since we have thousands of new innovations all the time. Notice how easily your Libcommie rants are defeated with only 1% of the words you use.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Marx was obsessed with monopolies because he lacked the IQ to contemplate that we would simply make them illegal when they interfered with capitalism. Here we are 150 years later and blind dumb liberal parrots are still obsessed with Marxist monopoly 100 years after we made them illegal . You can't make that level of ignorance up .

 

[anotherlife]

Marx was obsessed with monopolies because he lacked the IQ to contemplate that we would simply make them illegal when they interfered with capitalism. Here we are 150 years later and blind dumb liberal parrots are still obsessed with Marxist monopoly 100 years after we made them illegal . You can't make that level of ignorance up .

Are you a communist dear? What else do you want to make "simply illegal"? Hehehe.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Marx was obsessed with monopolies because he lacked the IQ to contemplate that we would simply make them illegal when they interfered with capitalism. Here we are 150 years later and blind dumb liberal parrots are still obsessed with Marxist monopoly 100 years after we made them illegal . You can't make that level of ignorance up .

Are you a communist dear? What else do you want to make "simply illegal"? Hehehe.

We want to make everything illegal that interferes with Republican capitalism. 1+1 = 2

Marx perhaps could be forgiven because he wrote speculatively and prematurely in precapitalist times but modern Marxists are unforgivable deadly retards who refuse to see that capitalism has transformed the planet, most recently by instantly eliminating 40% of all poverty on earth when China belatedly switched to it.

 

[anotherlife]

Marx was obsessed with monopolies because he lacked the IQ to contemplate that we would simply make them illegal when they interfered with capitalism. Here we are 150 years later and blind dumb liberal parrots are still obsessed with Marxist monopoly 100 years after we made them illegal . You can't make that level of ignorance up .

Are you a communist dear? What else do you want to make "simply illegal"? Hehehe.

We want to make everything illegal that interferes with Republican capitalism. 1+1 = 2

Marx perhaps could be forgiven because he wrote speculatively and prematurely in precapitalist times but modern Marxists are unforgivable deadly retards who refuse to see that capitalism has transformed the planet, most recently by instantly eliminating 40% of all poverty on earth when China belatedly switched to it.

Where do you get this lunacy? Is it in the cool aid? You would fare good in the Soviet Union as a gulag brigade fuhrer.

 

[Supposn]

Apparently the system is working extremely well since we have thousands of new innovations all the time. Notice how easily your Libcommie rants are defeated with only 1% of the words you use. ...
... Marx was obsessed with monopolies because he lacked the IQ to contemplate that we would simply make them illegal when they interfered with capitalism. Here we are 150 years later and blind dumb liberal parrots are still obsessed with Marxist monopoly 100 years after we made them illegal . You can't make that level of ignorance up.

Edward Baiamonte, but the system would not now be working as well, our nation’s economy would now be much poorer, and are government more similar to a totalitarian nation had it not been for the liberal innovations signed by both the Republican and the Democratic Roosevelt presidents. The entire first ten of our constitutional amendments would not now have survived intact.

Both the extreme left and right wings of our nation’s political spectrum hated FDR. The extreme left hated him because he prevented the USA from becoming a socialist nation. Upon that point, I consider their analysis of his legacy to be correct. He did prevent the USA from being a socialist nation.

The extreme right wing hated FDR because (the “traitor to his class”) prevented the ascending of a U.S. political party that would have emulated the self-professed defenders of Germany from a German communist party.

Most people that are aware of the German political party’s actual name, the National Socialist German Workers' Party, aka Nationalsozialist Party, aka Nazi Party, consider that name to be ironic. The party was from its beginning funded primarily by Gemany's capitalists and they thrived under the Nazi administration.

Unfortunately, your ignorance is not unique.
I wish you well, Supposn

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Most people that are aware of the German political party’s actual name, the National Socialist German Workers' Party, aka Nationalsozialist Party, aka Nazi Party, consider that name to be ironic.

if you have evidence I of that I will pay you $10,000. Bet??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The party was from its beginning funded primarily by Gemany's capitalists and they thrived under the Nazi administration.

it 100% impossible for capitalists to thrive under socialism

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The entire first ten of our constitutional amendments would not now have survived intact.

are you nuts?? the first 10 amendments protect of from liberal govt. Did you think our genius conservative Founders were worried about the Girl Scouts taking away our guns or free speech?? They saw govt as the enemy while liberals and Nazis see govt as magical.