How the Trump Administration Rushed to Judgment in Minneapolis Shooting - The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act.

Dante

I have always been here
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
80,989
Reaction score
39,184
Points
2,300
Location
Rebellion Central
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?

Opinion | The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act.
The Editorial Board - Jan. 25, 2026

The federal government owes Americans a thorough investigation and a truthful accounting of the Saturday morning shooting of Alex Jeffrey Pretti on a Minneapolis street. When the government kills, it has an obligation to demonstrate that it has acted in the public interest. Instead, the Trump administration is once again engaged in a perversion of justice.

Mere hours after Mr. Pretti died, Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, declared without offering evidence that Mr. Pretti had “committed an act of domestic terrorism.” Gregory Bovino, a Border Patrol official, offered his own assessment: “This looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.”

These unfounded and inflammatory judgments pre-empt the outcome of an investigation, which the Department of Homeland Security has promised. They also appear wholly inconsistent with several videos recorded at the scene.

Those videos showed that Mr. Pretti had nothing but a phone in his hands when he was tackled by Border Patrol agents, and that he never drew the gun he was carrying (and reportedly had a license to carry). Indeed, the videos seem to show that one federal agent took the gun from Mr. Pretti moments before a different agent shot him from behind. Separate analyses by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Associated Press, CBS News and other organizations all concluded that the videos contradict the Trump administration’s description of the killing.

The administration is urging Americans to reject the evidence of their eyes and ears. Ms. Noem and Mr. Bovino are lying in defiance of obvious truths. They are lying in the manner of authoritarian regimes that require people to accept lies as a demonstration of power.

Even worse is that all of this feels so terribly familiar. Earlier this month, a federal agent shot and killed another Minneapolis resident, Renee Good. In that case, too, the Trump administration has demonized the victim and has blocked a state investigation of the killing.

Truth is a line of demarcation between a democratic government and an authoritarian regime. Mr. Pretti and Ms. Good are dead. The American people deserve to know what happened.

The temperature in Minneapolis is dangerously high. There is an urgent need for the federal agents deployed to the city to step back and take a breath before more Americans are hurt or killed. Those protesting the Trump administration have an equal obligation to avoid violence.

The American people also need answers about whether federal agents acted inappropriately, and the behavior of the Trump administration means that it will be impossible to trust any federal investigation that it conducts. President Trump and his appointees have demonstrated themselves to be unconcerned with truth and willing to lie to serve their own interests. Congress therefore must step in. The Constitution vests it with the power to hold hearings, issue subpoenas and demand answers.

Congress ought to investigate both the circumstances of the recent killings in Minneapolis and the broader conduct of the federal agencies engaged in Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown, including their treatment of peaceful protesters. The video evidence shows that the incident that ended in Mr. Pretti’s death began when a federal agent lunged at a protester and knocked her to the ground. There are many similar videos and documented instances of federal agents using unnecessary violence against people who are peacefully protesting or documenting events — both behaviors protected under the First Amendment.

Congress has the power to hold the administration accountable through its control of federal spending. A pending bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security offers a crucial opportunity to perform scrutiny and impose necessary guardrails, such as funding for body cameras.

The federal government also has sought to prevent investigations by the state of Minnesota. This must end. A federal judge in Minnesota issued a temporary restraining order on Saturday evening, at the behest of the state, barring federal agencies from destroying evidence related to Mr. Pretti’s killing. The need for such an order is both evident and extraordinary.

“The credibility of ICE and D.H.S. are at stake,” Senator Bill Cassidy, a Louisiana Republican increasingly at odds with Mr. Trump, posted on social media on Saturday. “There must be a full joint federal and state investigation. We can trust the American people with the truth.”

The Trump administration has made no attempt to calm the waters in Minneapolis. It is a disgrace that the first public comment by Mr. Trump in the wake of Mr. Pretti’s death was to post a picture on social media of what he described as “the gunman’s gun.” Stephen Miller, arguably Mr. Trump’s most influential adviser, wrote on social media, without offering evidence, that Mr. Pretti was “an assassin.”

It is premature to reach conclusions about what exactly happened on that Minneapolis street. The Trump administration should not have done so, and we will not do so. What is clear, however, is that the federal government needs to re-establish public faith in the agencies and officers who are carrying out Mr. Trump’s crackdown on immigration. If the administration is allowed to act with impunity and avoid even the most basic accountability, the result will be more violence.

The editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values. It is separate from the newsroom.

side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.

How the Trump Administration Rushed to Judgment in Minneapolis Shooting​

The administration was in a race to control the narrative around the killing of Alex Pretti, even as videos emerged that contradicted the government’s account.

Not long after federal agents shot and killed a 37-year-old Minneapolis resident on Saturday, senior members of the Trump administration were ready with their conclusions about what had happened and who was to blame.

Stephen Miller, President Trump’s homeland security adviser, called the victim, Alex Pretti, who was filming Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis, a “domestic terrorist.” Gregory Bovino, the official in charge of Border Patrol operations, said Mr. Pretti was out to “massacre law enforcement.” The Department of Homeland Security said an agent had fired “defensive shots” because he was “fearing for his life and the lives and safety of fellow officers.”

Even as videos emerged that contradicted the government’s account, the Trump administration was in a race to control the narrative around the killing of Mr. Pretti, a registered nurse with no criminal record who was pinned down when immigration agents opened fire and killed him. The rush to blame Mr. Pretti and exonerate the immigration agents — even while officials were still gathering the facts — deviates entirely from the way law enforcement investigations are normally carried out.

But it also underscores what has become a pattern by Mr. Trump and top administration officials to justify an increasingly violent crackdown: immediately going on the offensive and demonizing the victim, often distorting the facts in the process.
 
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper...

And why do you think that is?

aifkxv.jpg
 
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.
Weird, the left claimed J6 peaceful protesters were “domestic terrorists” because they were interfering with a Federal proceeding.

Now suddenly it’s okay to impede and attack federal agents doing their jobs?
 
Weird, the left claimed J6 peaceful protesters were “domestic terrorists” because they were interfering with a Federal proceeding.

Now suddenly it’s okay to impede and attack federal agents doing their jobs?
The Jan 6 rioters were not "interfering with a Federal proceeding." They were attacking LE that was protecting the Capitol and our duly elected representatives


your attempt at passing off a disingenuous piece of shit as a valid and credible argument?

Big Fail
 
The Jan 6 rioters were not "interfering with a Federal proceeding." They were attacking LE that was protecting the Capitol and our duly elected representatives


your attempt at passing off a disingenuous piece of shit as a valid and credible argument?

Big Fail
Is that why the Capitol Police opened the doors and escorted protesters in?

You still can’t explain why it perfectly fine to kill Ashli Babbitt when the other cops behind her did not see any threat, but the guy behind a door had every right to shoot her. She never had a firearm, she wasn’t brawling with any cop.

So let’s hear it.
 
Is that why the Capitol Police opened the doors and escorted protesters in?

You still can’t explain why it perfectly fine to kill Ashli Babbitt when the other cops behind her did not see any threat, but the guy behind a door had every right to shoot her. She never had a firearm, she wasn’t brawling with any cop.

So let’s hear it.
Don't hold your breath.

He's a hit and run artist.
 
Is that why the Capitol Police opened the doors and escorted protesters in?

You still can’t explain why it perfectly fine to kill Ashli Babbitt when the other cops behind her did not see any threat, but the guy behind a door had every right to shoot her. She never had a firearm, she wasn’t brawling with any cop.

So let’s hear it.
You mean like the videos of LE escorting people out and your weirdo pals saying they were being invieted in?

And many entrances to Capitol.

We see the rioters and the extreme violence against LE .

WHY DO YOU CHOOSE TO DENY THE FACTS?



Fox News uses selective U.S. Capitol security footage to spread misinformation on Jan. 6


Fox, Dominion reach $787M settlement over election claims

 
Is that why the Capitol Police opened the doors and escorted protesters in?

You still can’t explain why it perfectly fine to kill Ashli Babbitt when the other cops behind her did not see any threat, but the guy behind a door had every right to shoot her. She never had a firearm, she wasn’t brawling with any cop.

So let’s hear it.
Nobody claimed Ashli was shot because she had a firearm, so what are you going on about?

Riot gear LE was coming up the steps just before Ashli was shot.

Video shows new angle of Ashli Bobbitt shooting inside Capitol​


She is a crazed individual at the vanguard of a vicious attack

Heavily barricaded doors

Officer has a gun and shouts of it are heard. Ashli ignores it and continues to try and get inside to allow rioters access to duly elected representatives of the people in harms way

Oh, and fuk you HikerGuy83

Don't hold your breath.

He's a hit and run artist.
fuk you
 
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.
Don't be a retarded ass.... The idiot decided to wrestle with ice agents even though he was carrying a gun. I don't care what he had in his hand if he was waving it around and they knew that he was carrying what were they supposed to do wait until after they were dead before they decided to use deadly force?

Start placing responsibility on the individual you dick head...
People die in Minnesota especially in Minneapolis die every week at the hands of armed criminals..... many of whom are illegal by the way. I realize your entire culture is one of non-responsibility and that you would prefer law enforcement officer be shot dead first before he decides to pull his gun.

Here's a suggestion for you... why don't you try wearing a gun and tackling a police officer? I don't care what that police officer's politics are you're probably going to get plugged.
 
15th post
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.
Everyone around trump takes on his stench, the stench of lies. These people lie to our face, even though video evidence prove they are lying. trump has been doing that very thing since he came down on the golden escalator, and you simple minded Magats fall for every lie.
 
Everyone around trump takes on his stench, the stench of lies. These people lie to our face, even though video evidence prove they are lying. trump has been doing that very thing since he came down on the golden escalator, and you simple minded Magats fall for every lie.
Too bad He didn't have the media in His pocket.
 
Don't be a retarded ass.... The idiot decided to wrestle with ice agents ....
Nope. No he did not.

next

New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

 
Two narratives that made it into articles in a major Newspaper (one that evidently scares the bejeezuz out of djt): "https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/...istration-minneapolis-shooting-response.html?" and "The Trump Administration Is Lying to Our Faces. Congress Must Act."

The second one is based on irrefutable facts. We evidence from the bench, where courts have said this is so. The first article? Also, based on irrefutable facts. So how does one argue against them and appear to be reasonable and rational?



side-note: Bari Weiss and her guy d Tony Dokoupil, have attacked news using views that are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values.
FB_IMG_1769436409934.webp

You can kiss my ass, you loons only care about something if it fits your narrative. You loons are sick.
 
Back
Top Bottom