How The Democrats Created A Nation of Terrorists

[PoliticalChic]

Notice the OP avoids and evades answering questions but instead resorts to her old method of cherry picking cut and paste to change the subject.

So again, how did the Republican administration of Reagan respond to the terrorist attack in Beirut when the Embassy was bombed killing 63 people including 17 Americans? Besides the Iranian government supported students in Iran taking hostages at the Embassy in Iran, what American targeted terrorist attack occurred if any during the 70's?

You failed to deny anything I've posted.

But...I understand where you're coming from: your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

True?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Iran sided with Nazi Germany during the first two years of WWII.

That was Shah Reza Pahlavi, not Mossadegh, Eisenhower installed Shah Reza Pahlavi's son Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi in place of Mossadegh after the coup.

Totally incorrect.

I'll correct it in a bit...

 

[Moonglow]

Thank you Mr. Burns..and now for more crepulance....

Cartoonish assman says what?

You need bath..

In other words your usual spamming gibberish.

That's what I thought.

spam
spam/
verb
gerund or present participle: spamming

1. send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet.

gib·ber·ish
[ˈjib(ə)riSH]
NOUN

1. unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing; nonsense:
   "he talks gibberish"

Well, at least you know what you post...

 

[PoliticalChic]

What the heck is it with the Democrats and their love affair with maniacal dictators, especially Persian ones???

Since when was Eisenhower a Democrat???
Look up "Operation Ajax" and learn how the Republicans created a nation of tyrants out of a Democratically elected government!!!

Eisenhower's Diary Confession of CIA Coup in Iran: Oct. 8, 1953

the Ayatollah Khomeini killed more human beings (about twenty thousand) in two weeks than had been killed by the Shah [60,000] during his entire thirty-eight years.

You seem to have left out the 60,000 part in your "fuzzy math" lie.

I quoted a college text.

You performed the act that identifies Liberals: you lie.



I believe it is an infraction to alter my posts.
Don't do it again.

The amount of death is cited.. It is a quote form the Ayaturda himself...

We already concluded that you know less than nothing....but...if you insist....



"[4][5] some have suggested the Shah's human rights record fares better than that of the revolutionaries who overthrew him. According to political historian Ervand Abrahamian,
"Whereas less than 100 political prisoners had been executed between 1971 and 1979, more than 7900 were executed between 1981 and 1985. ... the prison system was centralized and drastically expanded ... Prison life was drastically worse under the Islamic Republic than under the Pahlavis. One who survived both writes that four months under warden Asadollah Lajevardi took the toll of four years under SAVAK.[6] In the prison literature of the Pahlavi era, the recurring words had been "boredom" and "monotony." In that of the Islamic Republic, they were "fear," "death," "terror," "horror," and most frequent of all "nightmare" (kabos)." [7]"
Human rights in the Imperial State of Iran - Wikipedia

So in you rmind the Shah was okey dokey, in terms of your love of murder to retain power....No surprise......

"So in you rmind the Shah was okey dokey, in terms of your love of murder to retain power....No surprise....."



It's amusing that a dolt like you feels it necessary to "clarify" the words of a scholar....myself.

My words are precise, and are more than satisfactory.



As I stated, the Shah was a lover of the Nazis, and, hence...not "okey dokey' with me.


But far, far better than the 7th century maniacs that Democrat Jimmy Carter installed in Iran.


And the snake in the White House gave a nuclear weapons go-ahead to.

 

[Camp]

Notice the OP avoids and evades answering questions but instead resorts to her old method of cherry picking cut and paste to change the subject.

So again, how did the Republican administration of Reagan respond to the terrorist attack in Beirut when the Embassy was bombed killing 63 people including 17 Americans? Besides the Iranian government supported students in Iran taking hostages at the Embassy in Iran, what American targeted terrorist attack occurred if any during the 70's?

You failed to deny anything I've posted.

But...I understand where you're coming from: your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

True?

This has to do with you starting and promoting a fraudulent thread where you are attempting to rewrite history with your usual method of disjointed cherry picked cut and paste nonsense to blame the current era of terrorism away from where it belongs.
Specifically, you are using your last post to evade answering some simple questions. Integrity is something you lack.

 

[Moonglow]

What the heck is it with the Democrats and their love affair with maniacal dictators, especially Persian ones???

Since when was Eisenhower a Democrat???
Look up "Operation Ajax" and learn how the Republicans created a nation of tyrants out of a Democratically elected government!!!

Eisenhower's Diary Confession of CIA Coup in Iran: Oct. 8, 1953

Iran sided with Nazi Germany during the first two years of WWII. With many Iranians volunteering for and fighting with German Troops -- Even the SS

Go ahead and shed tears for them. Nobody else will

Yup.....these are the sorts that Democrats assist.....

"There were thousands of Muslims who directly joined and aided the Nazi war efforts, forming at least three Waffen SS Divions. “These SS Jihadists assisted the Ustashi Croats in their slaughter of 800,000 Serbs and Jews.”
http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Clubs_Handschar_Muslim_Waffen_SS.Islam


In Yugoslavia, Muslims and the Catholic Church formed the Ustashe, the most brutal of all Nazi forces: the German Croatian fuehrer, Dr. Ante Pavelic had a basket of 40 pounds of eyes on his desk. The guards in prison camp had a contest to see who could slit more throats in one night: the winner slit 1,350. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem organized these squads.
See Edwin Black, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust.”

Democrats assisted the Nazis so much, several hundred thousand died to defeat it...

 

[Moonglow]

Since when was Eisenhower a Democrat???
Look up "Operation Ajax" and learn how the Republicans created a nation of tyrants out of a Democratically elected government!!!

Eisenhower's Diary Confession of CIA Coup in Iran: Oct. 8, 1953

You seem to have left out the 60,000 part in your "fuzzy math" lie.

I quoted a college text.

You performed the act that identifies Liberals: you lie.



I believe it is an infraction to alter my posts.
Don't do it again.

The amount of death is cited.. It is a quote form the Ayaturda himself...

We already concluded that you know less than nothing....but...if you insist....



"[4][5] some have suggested the Shah's human rights record fares better than that of the revolutionaries who overthrew him. According to political historian Ervand Abrahamian,
"Whereas less than 100 political prisoners had been executed between 1971 and 1979, more than 7900 were executed between 1981 and 1985. ... the prison system was centralized and drastically expanded ... Prison life was drastically worse under the Islamic Republic than under the Pahlavis. One who survived both writes that four months under warden Asadollah Lajevardi took the toll of four years under SAVAK.[6] In the prison literature of the Pahlavi era, the recurring words had been "boredom" and "monotony." In that of the Islamic Republic, they were "fear," "death," "terror," "horror," and most frequent of all "nightmare" (kabos)." [7]"
Human rights in the Imperial State of Iran - Wikipedia

So in you rmind the Shah was okey dokey, in terms of your love of murder to retain power....No surprise......

"So in you rmind the Shah was okey dokey, in terms of your love of murder to retain power....No surprise....."



It's amusing that a dolt like you feels it necessary to "clarify" the words of a scholar....myself.

My words are precise, and are more than satisfactory.



As I stated, the Shah was a lover of the Nazis, and, hence...not "okey dokey' with me.


But far, far better than the 7th century maniacs that Democrat Jimmy Carter installed in Iran.


And the snake in the White House gave a nuclear weapons go-ahead to.

If you are a scholar,then a tricycle is a Harley Davidson motorcycle...Obama was just following Reagan lead, he also sold arms to Iran..

 

[PoliticalChic]

What the heck is it with the Democrats and their love affair with maniacal dictators, especially Persian ones???

Since when was Eisenhower a Democrat???
Look up "Operation Ajax" and learn how the Republicans created a nation of tyrants out of a Democratically elected government!!!

Eisenhower's Diary Confession of CIA Coup in Iran: Oct. 8, 1953

Iran sided with Nazi Germany during the first two years of WWII. With many Iranians volunteering for and fighting with German Troops -- Even the SS

Go ahead and shed tears for them. Nobody else will

Yup.....these are the sorts that Democrats assist.....

"There were thousands of Muslims who directly joined and aided the Nazi war efforts, forming at least three Waffen SS Divions. “These SS Jihadists assisted the Ustashi Croats in their slaughter of 800,000 Serbs and Jews.”
http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Clubs_Handschar_Muslim_Waffen_SS.Islam


In Yugoslavia, Muslims and the Catholic Church formed the Ustashe, the most brutal of all Nazi forces: the German Croatian fuehrer, Dr. Ante Pavelic had a basket of 40 pounds of eyes on his desk. The guards in prison camp had a contest to see who could slit more throats in one night: the winner slit 1,350. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem organized these squads.
See Edwin Black, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust.”

Democrats assisted the Nazis so much, several hundred thousand died to defeat it...

This deserves an entire thread of its own....but let this suffice"

" Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to•the Soviet Union."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48

 

[edthecynic]

Iran sided with Nazi Germany during the first two years of WWII.

That was Shah Reza Pahlavi, not Mossadegh, Eisenhower installed Shah Reza Pahlavi's son Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi in place of Mossadegh after the coup.

Totally incorrect.
I'll correct it in a bit...

You'll lie in a bit, you mean.
From your favorite source, Wiki:

By the early 1930s, Reza Pahlavi's close ties with Nazi Germany began worrying the Allied states. Germany's modern state and economy highly impressed the Shah, and there were hundreds of Germans involved in every aspect of the state, from setting up factories to building roads, railroads and bridges.[8]

The Shah went on to ask the international community to use the native name of "Iran" in 1935 to address to his country, which in Persian means 'Land of the Aryans' and refers to Airyanem Vaejah, the Avestan name of the original homeland of the Aryans.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Notice the OP avoids and evades answering questions but instead resorts to her old method of cherry picking cut and paste to change the subject.

So again, how did the Republican administration of Reagan respond to the terrorist attack in Beirut when the Embassy was bombed killing 63 people including 17 Americans? Besides the Iranian government supported students in Iran taking hostages at the Embassy in Iran, what American targeted terrorist attack occurred if any during the 70's?

You failed to deny anything I've posted.

But...I understand where you're coming from: your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

True?

This has to do with you starting and promoting a fraudulent thread where you are attempting to rewrite history with your usual method of disjointed cherry picked cut and paste nonsense to blame the current era of terrorism away from where it belongs.
Specifically, you are using your last post to evade answering some simple questions. Integrity is something you lack.

"... you are attempting to rewrite history..."

Well, then....it should be eminently simple for you to provide proof that anything I've posted isn't correct.

But you can't.


Perhaps this is your motivation:
....your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.


True?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Iran sided with Nazi Germany during the first two years of WWII.

That was Shah Reza Pahlavi, not Mossadegh, Eisenhower installed Shah Reza Pahlavi's son Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi in place of Mossadegh after the coup.

Totally incorrect.
I'll correct it in a bit...

You'll lie in a bit, you mean.
From your favorite source, Wiki:

By the early 1930s, Reza Pahlavi's close ties with Nazi Germany began worrying the Allied states. Germany's modern state and economy highly impressed the Shah, and there were hundreds of Germans involved in every aspect of the state, from setting up factories to building roads, railroads and bridges.[8]

The Shah went on to ask the international community to use the native name of "Iran" in 1935 to address to his country, which in Persian means 'Land of the Aryans' and refers to Airyanem Vaejah, the Avestan name of the original homeland of the Aryans.

".... in Persian means 'Land of the Aryans'

Exactly as I said.


"In 1935 the Iranian government requested those countries which it had diplomatic relations with, to call Persia "Iran," which is the name of the country in Persian.

The suggestion for the change is said to have come from the Iranian ambassador to Germany, who came under the influence of the Nazis. At the time Germany was in the grip of racial fever and cultivated good relations with nations of "Aryan" blood. "
Iran Chamber Society: When "Persia" became "Iran"



Now....what else would you like me to teach you?

 

[Camp]

Notice the OP avoids and evades answering questions but instead resorts to her old method of cherry picking cut and paste to change the subject.

So again, how did the Republican administration of Reagan respond to the terrorist attack in Beirut when the Embassy was bombed killing 63 people including 17 Americans? Besides the Iranian government supported students in Iran taking hostages at the Embassy in Iran, what American targeted terrorist attack occurred if any during the 70's?

You failed to deny anything I've posted.

But...I understand where you're coming from: your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

True?

This has to do with you starting and promoting a fraudulent thread where you are attempting to rewrite history with your usual method of disjointed cherry picked cut and paste nonsense to blame the current era of terrorism away from where it belongs.
Specifically, you are using your last post to evade answering some simple questions. Integrity is something you lack.

"... you are attempting to rewrite history..."

Well, then....it should be eminently simple for you to provide proof that anything I've posted isn't correct.

But you can't.


Perhaps this is your motivation:
....your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.


True?

Why do you refuse to answer the simple questions you were asked? When people refuse and evade asking reasonable simple questions it means they are hiding something, afraid of being caught lying or misrepresenting and simple cowardly.

Which one are you?

 

[PoliticalChic]

“Germany was our age-old and natural ally, Love of Germany was synonymous with love for Iran. The sound of German officers' footsteps was heard on the shores of the Nile. Swastika flags were flying from the outskirts of Moscow to the peaks of the Caucasus Mts. Iranian patriots eagerly awaited the arrival of their old allies. My friend and I would spin tales about the grandeur of the superior race. We considered Germany the chosen representative of this race in Europe and Iran its representative in Asia. The right to life and role was ours. Others had no choice but submission and slavery. We discarded the old maps and remade Iran into a country larger than what it was in Achaemenian times.” Reza Shah.

 

[BlueGin]

Cartoonish assman says what?

You need bath..

In other words your usual spamming gibberish.

That's what I thought.

spam
spam/
verb
gerund or present participle: spamming

1. send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet.

gib·ber·ish
[ˈjib(ə)riSH]
NOUN

1. unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing; nonsense:
   "he talks gibberish"

Well, at least you know what you post...

Upsets you that your party supports domestics terrorists like the Weathermen and Black Panthers. But hey...maybe the families of the armored guards and police that they murdered in cold blood have died of old age now so you can pretend otherwise.

 

[Wry Catcher]

the dimocrap scum party loves international terrorists and has ALWAYS had a domestic terrorist arm.

Beginning in 1866 with the KKK all the way through to today with their attempt at creating an American ISIS in the BLM.

When one fails or falls into general disrepute, they form another terrorist arm..... The Occupy (bowel) Movement, SDS, Weathermen; or they form an alliance with professional criminals like they did for 80 years with The Mob.

They also have the Unions who used to be fairly violent.

the dimocrap scum party is a criminal organization, NOT a political party.

Think about all the violent groups in this Country's history and who they side with....

The above editorial comments are brought to you by Bullshit, the favorite food of the hateful, ignorant and all around asshole's, those who believe a house divided is beneficial. Try a test, its first bowl is free, and disregard the stink and slim it leaves on your esophagus, it provides an insulating film to protect the brain from nutrients - preventing that terrible disease cognitive dissonance.

Our sponsor, Bullshit, will continue to provide products - along with our partner the Dumpster's - to keep American's safe from cognition; it will promulgate further editorials promoting hate, and that “War is peace" and "ignorance is strength.”

After the initial trial, free packaging and delivery will be affordable, at a one time cost of your soul.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Advocating the common Aryan ancestry of 'the two Nations.' In 1936 then, the Reich Cabinet issued a special decree exempting Iranians from the restrictions of the Nuremberg Racial Laws on the grounds that they were 'pure blooded Aryans' (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 160). And in 1939, the Nazis provided Persians with what they called a German Scientific Library. The library contained over 7.500 books carefully selected "to convince lranian readers...of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the "Aryan culture" of Iran" (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 161). In various pro-Nazi publications, lectures, speeches, and ceremonies, parallels were drawn between the Shah of Iran and Hitler, and praise the charisma and virtue of the Fuhrerprinzip (Rezun. 1982, p. 29).

Notice the OP avoids and evades answering questions but instead resorts to her old method of cherry picking cut and paste to change the subject.

So again, how did the Republican administration of Reagan respond to the terrorist attack in Beirut when the Embassy was bombed killing 63 people including 17 Americans? Besides the Iranian government supported students in Iran taking hostages at the Embassy in Iran, what American targeted terrorist attack occurred if any during the 70's?

You failed to deny anything I've posted.

But...I understand where you're coming from: your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

True?

This has to do with you starting and promoting a fraudulent thread where you are attempting to rewrite history with your usual method of disjointed cherry picked cut and paste nonsense to blame the current era of terrorism away from where it belongs.
Specifically, you are using your last post to evade answering some simple questions. Integrity is something you lack.

"... you are attempting to rewrite history..."

Well, then....it should be eminently simple for you to provide proof that anything I've posted isn't correct.

But you can't.


Perhaps this is your motivation:
....your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.


True?

Why do you refuse to answer the simple questions you were asked? When people refuse and evade asking reasonable simple questions it means they are hiding something, afraid of being caught lying or misrepresenting and simple cowardly.

Which one are you?

Sooooo sorry....I'm not going to allow you to change the subject.


Third time for this query:
....your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

Is this true?

 

[Moonglow]

You need bath..

In other words your usual spamming gibberish.

That's what I thought.

spam
spam/
verb
gerund or present participle: spamming

1. send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet.

gib·ber·ish
[ˈjib(ə)riSH]
NOUN

1. unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing; nonsense:
   "he talks gibberish"

Well, at least you know what you post...

Upsets you that your party supports domestics terrorists like the Weathermen and Black Panthers. But hey...maybe the families of the armored guards and police that they murdered in cold blood have died of old age now so you can pretend otherwise.

A swing and a miss, no surprise...

Your mistake is assuming I have a political party.. I do have parties,but not with politics...

 

[Moonglow]

Advocating the common Aryan ancestry of 'the two Nations.' In 1936 then, the Reich Cabinet issued a special decree exempting Iranians from the restrictions of the Nuremberg Racial Laws on the grounds that they were 'pure blooded Aryans' (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 160). And in 1939, the Nazis provided Persians with what they called a German Scientific Library. The library contained over 7.500 books carefully selected "to convince lranian readers...of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the "Aryan culture" of Iran" (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 161). In various pro-Nazi publications, lectures, speeches, and ceremonies, parallels were drawn between the Shah of Iran and Hitler, and praise the charisma and virtue of the Fuhrerprinzip (Rezun. 1982, p. 29).

Notice the OP avoids and evades answering questions but instead resorts to her old method of cherry picking cut and paste to change the subject.

So again, how did the Republican administration of Reagan respond to the terrorist attack in Beirut when the Embassy was bombed killing 63 people including 17 Americans? Besides the Iranian government supported students in Iran taking hostages at the Embassy in Iran, what American targeted terrorist attack occurred if any during the 70's?

You failed to deny anything I've posted.

But...I understand where you're coming from: your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

True?

This has to do with you starting and promoting a fraudulent thread where you are attempting to rewrite history with your usual method of disjointed cherry picked cut and paste nonsense to blame the current era of terrorism away from where it belongs.
Specifically, you are using your last post to evade answering some simple questions. Integrity is something you lack.

"... you are attempting to rewrite history..."

Well, then....it should be eminently simple for you to provide proof that anything I've posted isn't correct.

But you can't.


Perhaps this is your motivation:
....your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.


True?

Why do you refuse to answer the simple questions you were asked? When people refuse and evade asking reasonable simple questions it means they are hiding something, afraid of being caught lying or misrepresenting and simple cowardly.

Which one are you?

Sooooo sorry....I'm not going to allow you to change the subject.


Third time for this query:
....your god, Democrat Franklin Roosevelt had pretty much the same view of Jewish folks as Carter, Obama,....and the Ayatollah.

Is this true?

Practically the whole US society had a problem with Jews,both democrats and republicans...

 

[edthecynic]

Iran sided with Nazi Germany during the first two years of WWII.

That was Shah Reza Pahlavi, not Mossadegh, Eisenhower installed Shah Reza Pahlavi's son Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi in place of Mossadegh after the coup.

Totally incorrect.
I'll correct it in a bit...

You'll lie in a bit, you mean.
From your favorite source, Wiki:

By the early 1930s, Reza Pahlavi's close ties with Nazi Germany began worrying the Allied states. Germany's modern state and economy highly impressed the Shah, and there were hundreds of Germans involved in every aspect of the state, from setting up factories to building roads, railroads and bridges.[8]

The Shah went on to ask the international community to use the native name of "Iran" in 1935 to address to his country, which in Persian means 'Land of the Aryans' and refers to Airyanem Vaejah, the Avestan name of the original homeland of the Aryans.

".... in Persian means 'Land of the Aryans'

Exactly as I said.


"In 1935 the Iranian government requested those countries which it had diplomatic relations with, to call Persia "Iran," which is the name of the country in Persian.

The suggestion for the change is said to have come from the Iranian ambassador to Germany, who came under the influence of the Nazis. At the time Germany was in the grip of racial fever and cultivated good relations with nations of "Aryan" blood. "
Iran Chamber Society: When "Persia" became "Iran"
Now....what else would you like me to teach you?

Not "exactly" as YOU said, but exactly as I said, you left out the part where Shah Reza Pahlavi requested Persia be called Iran and dishonestly substituted "the Iranian government," AKA Shah Reza Pahlavi.
But nice try.

 

[edthecynic]

“Germany was our age-old and natural ally, Love of Germany was synonymous with love for Iran. The sound of German officers' footsteps was heard on the shores of the Nile. Swastika flags were flying from the outskirts of Moscow to the peaks of the Caucasus Mts. Iranian patriots eagerly awaited the arrival of their old allies. My friend and I would spin tales about the grandeur of the superior race. We considered Germany the chosen representative of this race in Europe and Iran its representative in Asia. The right to life and role was ours. Others had no choice but submission and slavery. We discarded the old maps and remade Iran into a country larger than what it was in Achaemenian times.” Reza Shah.

Again the tyrant Reza Shah Pahlavi, not the Democratically elected Mossadegh that Eisenhower had overthrown and installed Shah Reza Pahlavi's son Mohammad Shah Reza Pahlavi in his place.
Republicans own Iranian tyranny.