healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,738
- 11,142
- 900
A) How the MSM biased the news to get Biden elected.
Bad news gets more attention than good news.
B) Why the MSM committed to getting Biden elected.
The MSM donated 96% to Hillary in 2016, she lost, they spent 4 years of negative Trump news, and 90% of donations to Biden.
How they made the news BAD! Media Trump Hatred, Shows In 92% Negative Coverage Of His Presidency: Study
For its report, the Media Research Center did a lot of visual spadework.
It viewed some 1,007 evening news stories about the Trump White House on ABC, CBS and NBC from June 1 to Sept. 30(3 months).
That's the equivalent of about 32.7 hours of coverage, by TV standards an eternity of news time.
What they found was, as Trump himself might say, sad: "Over the summer, the broadcast networks have continued to pound Donald Trump and his team with the most hostile coverage of a president in TV news history — 92% negative, vs. just 8% positive."
www.investors.com
Summary.... Network news spent 32.7 hours in NEGATIVE Trump news while contributing to Biden 90% campaign that should have been reported!
So in the process of donating an estimated 40% of Biden's campaign spending on NEGATIVE Trump news...
The average TV advertising cost to run a 30-second commercial on a national network is $104,700. Everything You Need to Know About TV Advertising Costs
32.7 hours is equal to $410,842,800 in news that was negative and helped Biden's campaign.
Now consider Biden's campaign spent $1,063,053,521 between April 1, 2019 and November 23, 2020,
The negative news against Trump, favoring Biden is equal to nearly 40% of what Biden spent.
All the while the negative news about Trump/COVID selling advertising!
BECAUSE studies show negative news gets viewers, viewers get advertising!
News coverage of current affairs is predominantly negative.
www.pnas.org
Which brings us to COVID....
FACTS are biased MSM NEVER EVER told you these FACTS and I defy any of you to prove to me from any of your prior comments on this board YOU are aware of these FACTS!!!
Almost 3/4ths of deaths were to people over age 65! less than 5% under 45! So why were schools closed? Why didn't the MSM provide this distinction that actually was evident in the key word..."Comorbidity"!
If you were over 65, had the flu, diabetic, had high blood pressure, dementia or Sepsis (Sepsis is the body's extreme response to an infection. )you were pretty much a goner. But did you hear this from the BIASED MSM? NOPE! WHY because bad news was ALL the DEATHS and it was ALL during Trump's watch. BAD NEWS sells while providing negative coverage to help Biden!
Remember the BIASED MSM donated 96% to Hillary and she lost. They spent the next 4 years with mostly negative Trump news (see above) and in the meantime donated 90% of political payments to Biden AS WELL AS 40% ($410 million advertising dollars) of advertising equivalency in NEGATIVE Trump coverage on the 3 networks.
And then to top it off... "Mark Zuckerberg spent $419M on nonprofits ahead of 2020 election — and got out the Dem vote
nypost.com
So combine the networks donations of negative advertising of $410 million with Suck's $419 million to mostly Democrat voting precincts, Biden won.
Bad news gets more attention than good news.
B) Why the MSM committed to getting Biden elected.
The MSM donated 96% to Hillary in 2016, she lost, they spent 4 years of negative Trump news, and 90% of donations to Biden.
How they made the news BAD! Media Trump Hatred, Shows In 92% Negative Coverage Of His Presidency: Study
For its report, the Media Research Center did a lot of visual spadework.
It viewed some 1,007 evening news stories about the Trump White House on ABC, CBS and NBC from June 1 to Sept. 30(3 months).
That's the equivalent of about 32.7 hours of coverage, by TV standards an eternity of news time.
What they found was, as Trump himself might say, sad: "Over the summer, the broadcast networks have continued to pound Donald Trump and his team with the most hostile coverage of a president in TV news history — 92% negative, vs. just 8% positive."
Media Trump Hatred Shows In 92% Negative Coverage Of His Presidency: Study
The big TV networks don't hide their contempt for President Trump. So it's no surprise a new study shows 92% of the media's Trump coverage is negative.
www.investors.com
So in the process of donating an estimated 40% of Biden's campaign spending on NEGATIVE Trump news...
The average TV advertising cost to run a 30-second commercial on a national network is $104,700. Everything You Need to Know About TV Advertising Costs
32.7 hours is equal to $410,842,800 in news that was negative and helped Biden's campaign.
Now consider Biden's campaign spent $1,063,053,521 between April 1, 2019 and November 23, 2020,
The negative news against Trump, favoring Biden is equal to nearly 40% of what Biden spent.
All the while the negative news about Trump/COVID selling advertising!
BECAUSE studies show negative news gets viewers, viewers get advertising!
News coverage of current affairs is predominantly negative.
Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news
News coverage of current affairs is predominantly negative. American accounts of this tendency tend to focus on journalistic practices, but this cannot easily account for negative news content around the world. It is more likely that negativity in news is a product of a human tendency to be more...
www.pnas.org
Which brings us to COVID....
FACTS are biased MSM NEVER EVER told you these FACTS and I defy any of you to prove to me from any of your prior comments on this board YOU are aware of these FACTS!!!
Almost 3/4ths of deaths were to people over age 65! less than 5% under 45! So why were schools closed? Why didn't the MSM provide this distinction that actually was evident in the key word..."Comorbidity"!
If you were over 65, had the flu, diabetic, had high blood pressure, dementia or Sepsis (Sepsis is the body's extreme response to an infection. )you were pretty much a goner. But did you hear this from the BIASED MSM? NOPE! WHY because bad news was ALL the DEATHS and it was ALL during Trump's watch. BAD NEWS sells while providing negative coverage to help Biden!
Remember the BIASED MSM donated 96% to Hillary and she lost. They spent the next 4 years with mostly negative Trump news (see above) and in the meantime donated 90% of political payments to Biden AS WELL AS 40% ($410 million advertising dollars) of advertising equivalency in NEGATIVE Trump coverage on the 3 networks.
And then to top it off... "Mark Zuckerberg spent $419M on nonprofits ahead of 2020 election — and got out the Dem vote
Mark Zuckerberg spent $419M on nonprofits ahead of 2020 election — and got out the Dem vote
During the 2020 election, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg spent hundreds of millions of dollars to turn out likely Democratic voters. But this wasn’t traditional political spending. He funded a target…
nypost.com
So combine the networks donations of negative advertising of $410 million with Suck's $419 million to mostly Democrat voting precincts, Biden won.
Last edited:
