I found multiple rankings based on funded, unfunded and contingent liabilities are the most solid metrics followed by high net worth migration rates, job migrations, real estate market problems and what looks like several other metrics I do not understand are also being used in the warring lists, which ones do you use?
Yeah, I pay close attention to how well states have funded their public employee pension programs. Some of them are in deep shit.
It is criminal how those have been mismanaged and misappropriated. Promises were made by people with full knowledge that they could not deliver. How do the get away with that shit?
Because the promises they make are to people who won't retire for 20 or 30 years, long after the liar has retired himself and is laughing his ass off on the links with all the other old liars.
A promise today is a vote today. The negative consequences of that promise are deferred. It's a political tactic as old as the hills.
When you increase benefits and/or decrease contributions, that shit doesn't blow up until 30 years later.
The politicians absolutely depend on the ignorance of the rubes.