All of the intelligence agencies in the world working together could not find out exactly how many United Nations charity hustlers are on the UN’s payroll. I am talking about those UN employees whose paycheck is issued by the UN. Back in 2003 Madame Short Legs gave me a number to work with:
For the past ten years I worked with the number 50,000; assuming it had gone up to around 60,000. Now I am really confused.
It’s illogical to think that UNRWA represents half of all UN employees. So how many UN parasites are sucking high teat in all of the UN’s agencies, agency-subdivisions, and specialized agencies? It’s frightening to think there are categories nobody ever heard of. Not so with peacekeeping. Everybody’s heard about military personnel assigned to the UN by their governments, while few know about UN parasites attached to peacekeeping operations.
Click on the link for details about individual peacekeeping operations:
Wouldn’t it be nice to see the nationality breakdown of UN employees just to find out if Americans are employed in relation to the money they give? How many are not Americans? More importantly, how many UN employees are anti-America? A fair question when you look at the Americans assigned to the UN who are anti-America:
I’d also like to see an accurate list of the money each of the member states kick-in every year. I read somewhere that many countries never come up with a penny. Americans pick up their markers so they don’t get kicked out. I think the rules say you’re out if you don’t pay your dues for two years in a row.
Incidentally, back in the Clinton years the late Senator Jesse Helms (1921 - 2008 ), when he was Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, refused to pay UN dues. There was some speculation that the US would get the boot under the 2 year rule. I forget all of the details, but it’s too bad the US did not get kicked out.
And just what in hell is a “not huge bureaucracy” doing with all of those charity hustlers on the payroll to begin with?
Bottom line: The UN should never have been more than a debating society. Since it opened shop in 1945 the UN grew, and continues to grow, in leaps and bounds; so it’s no wonder the charity hustlers are pushing for taxing authority in UN treaties! They’ll need taxing authority of some kind in the near future if all of those hustlers expect to get decent Christmas bonuses in the coming years. Oops! Sorry. It should be “Holiday bonuses” or “Ramadan bonuses.”
"The United Nations Is a Huge Bureaucracy"
“Nope. A bureaucracy certainly, but not huge. The annual budget for core U.N. functions—based in New York City, Geneva, Nairobi, Vienna, and five regional commissions—is about $1.25 billion, or roughly what the Pentagon spends every 32 hours. The U.N. Secretariat has reduced its staff by just under 25 percent over the last 20 years and has had a zero-growth budget since 1996. The entire U.N. system, composed of the secretariat and 29 other organizations, employs a little more than 50,000 people, or just 2,000 more than work for the city of Stockholm. Total annual expenditures by all U.N. funds, programs, and specialized agencies equal about one fourth the municipal budget of New York City.”
Think Again: The United Nations
By Madeleine K Albright
September 1, 2003
For the past ten years I worked with the number 50,000; assuming it had gone up to around 60,000. Now I am really confused.
UNRWA is currently the largest agency-subdivision of the United Nations, employing a staff of 30,000, most of whom are Palestinians.
It’s illogical to think that UNRWA represents half of all UN employees. So how many UN parasites are sucking high teat in all of the UN’s agencies, agency-subdivisions, and specialized agencies? It’s frightening to think there are categories nobody ever heard of. Not so with peacekeeping. Everybody’s heard about military personnel assigned to the UN by their governments, while few know about UN parasites attached to peacekeeping operations.
Click on the link for details about individual peacekeeping operations:
Peacekeeping Fact Sheet
Fact Sheet as of 31 October 2013
[Note: statistical information on civilian personnel is as of 31 August 2013, unless otherwise specified]
Peacekeeping operations since 1948: 68Peacekeeping Operations: 16*
Current peacekeeping operations: 15
Current peace operations directed by the Department of
[*In addition to peacekeeping operations, DPKO directs one political mission: the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA).]
Personnel
Uniformed personnel: 98,014
Troops: 83,343Civilian personnel: 16,822 (as of 31 August)
Police: 12,807
Military observers: 1,864
International: 5,128UN Volunteers: 2,001
Local: 11,694
Total number of personnel serving in 15 peacekeeping operations: 116,837
Total number of personnel serving in 16 DPKO-led peace operations: 118,580
Countries contributing uniformed personnel: 119
Total fatalities: 3,164
Financial aspects
Approved resources for the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014: about $7.54 billion
Outstanding contributions to peacekeeping (as of 31 October 2013): about $3.26 billion
Wouldn’t it be nice to see the nationality breakdown of UN employees just to find out if Americans are employed in relation to the money they give? How many are not Americans? More importantly, how many UN employees are anti-America? A fair question when you look at the Americans assigned to the UN who are anti-America:
Samantha Power Downplays Jihadist Threat During Visit To Central African Republic
By Joseph A. Klein Saturday, December 21, 2013
Samantha Power Downplays Jihadist Threat During Visit To Central African Republic
I’d also like to see an accurate list of the money each of the member states kick-in every year. I read somewhere that many countries never come up with a penny. Americans pick up their markers so they don’t get kicked out. I think the rules say you’re out if you don’t pay your dues for two years in a row.
Incidentally, back in the Clinton years the late Senator Jesse Helms (1921 - 2008 ), when he was Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, refused to pay UN dues. There was some speculation that the US would get the boot under the 2 year rule. I forget all of the details, but it’s too bad the US did not get kicked out.
And just what in hell is a “not huge bureaucracy” doing with all of those charity hustlers on the payroll to begin with?
Bottom line: The UN should never have been more than a debating society. Since it opened shop in 1945 the UN grew, and continues to grow, in leaps and bounds; so it’s no wonder the charity hustlers are pushing for taxing authority in UN treaties! They’ll need taxing authority of some kind in the near future if all of those hustlers expect to get decent Christmas bonuses in the coming years. Oops! Sorry. It should be “Holiday bonuses” or “Ramadan bonuses.”
Last edited: