How many Americans agree with radical left-wing politicians?

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

Let’s take a look at a few radical left-wing talking points. And trying to identify what year did they start becoming popular. 20 years ago? 40 years ago?

“We stole land from the Indian”

“White homeless people are privileged”

“Andrew Jackson was a racist”

I will bet that most Americans don’t agree with those talking points… most Americans understand that things like slavery, warfare and conquest were part of human history.

Those 3 points listed above are just three examples of radical left-wing views. Of course we also have those who believe in 100 different genders.

Again When did such language become part of the American experience? The whole white people are privileged is relatively new within the past few years. But those ideas like we stole land from the Indian or Andrew Jackson was a racist. I’m guessing was popular in the media/Hollywood 30 or 40 years ago?


Because if you look at history, whether it is the history of the Jew, the Indian, the black, the Asian they did all of the same things that the white European Christian man did. But for some reason in America, the media, Hollywood, and some of our politicians hype up those three sentences above and even more types of what we can call anti-Americanism.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

Truth of The matter is Andrew Jackson was an American hero. He also adopted two Native American boys. Nobody can say that he hated Indians. There’s a long history of warfare between humans all over the world. That happens sometimes when people attempt to explore new lands. Not always sometimes there are agreements made or people convert to a new religion or cause willingly…..but nobody can deny that the Indian like the white man engaged in expansion warfare and slavery.

Andrew Jackson was a wonderful man no better or worse than the black, the Jew it the Indian of his time. All Americans of today owe a debt of gratitude to Andrew Jackson for expanding our country, for heroically as a young boy standing up to a British officer during the American revolution. … as a British officer slashed him in the face with a sword, he stood his ground with valiance.

 

[jack3]

Jackson was the kick ass who beat the crap out of his would be assassin. Or so I've heard.

 

[jack3]

But yeah, we took Indian land. Everyone is prejudiced, Jackson notwithstanding.

"Privilege" is just a dumb buzzword to sell books and workshops.

 

[jackflash]

Let’s take a look at a few radical left-wing talking points. And trying to identify what year did they start becoming popular. 20 years ago? 40 years ago?

“We stole land from the Indian”

“White homeless people are privileged”

“Andrew Jackson was a racist”

I will bet that most Americans don’t agree with those talking points… most Americans understand that things like slavery, warfare and conquest were part of human history.

Those 3 points listed above are just three examples of radical left-wing views. Of course we also have those who believe in 100 different genders.

Again When did such language become part of the American experience? The whole white people are privileged is relatively new within the past few years. But those ideas like we stole land from the Indian or Andrew Jackson was a racist. I’m guessing was popular in the media/Hollywood 30 or 40 years ago?


Because if you look at history, whether it is the history of the Jew, the Indian, the black, the Asian they did all of the same things that the white European Christian man did. But for some reason in America, the media, Hollywood, and some of our politicians hype up those three sentences above and even more types of what we can call anti-Americanism.

I truly don't know. I have noticed that the statist left needs to falsify their tabulation of votes to be able to place a candidate, & that tells me that they don't have as many followers as they claim to have. Their DEMANDS for drop boxes alone not to mention their requests for no I.D. verification well illustrates their lack of adequate support from the general American public. I am making a GUESS HERE as I have NO VERIFICATION of the following percentage figures I am listing. I would hazard an estimate of between 32% to 37% of the American population supports elected officials that harbor/promote the statist left ideology. Again, the before mentioned percentage 'estimates' is just my gut feeling from observable oddities such as the drop boxes/no I.D peculiarities.

 

[rampart]

“We stole land from the Indian”

who is "we?" it was obvious to the mayflower settlers whose continent it was and what they intended to do with it.

“White homeless people are privileged”

compared to black or other? you betcha.

“Andrew Jackson was a racist”

jackson. like most of us was quite complex. he somehow managed to command the most diverse little army ever assembled on the continent, but his treatment of slaves and cherokee does require critical analysis, and contributed to subsequent tragedies even today.

is this the history that should be taught to 3rd graders? don't worry. the bright kids will discern this for themselves.

 

[Votto]

Let’s take a look at a few radical left-wing talking points. And trying to identify what year did they start becoming popular. 20 years ago? 40 years ago?

“We stole land from the Indian”

“White homeless people are privileged”

“Andrew Jackson was a racist”

I will bet that most Americans don’t agree with those talking points… most Americans understand that things like slavery, warfare and conquest were part of human history.

Those 3 points listed above are just three examples of radical left-wing views. Of course we also have those who believe in 100 different genders.

Again When did such language become part of the American experience? The whole white people are privileged is relatively new within the past few years. But those ideas like we stole land from the Indian or Andrew Jackson was a racist. I’m guessing was popular in the media/Hollywood 30 or 40 years ago?


Because if you look at history, whether it is the history of the Jew, the Indian, the black, the Asian they did all of the same things that the white European Christian man did. But for some reason in America, the media, Hollywood, and some of our politicians hype up those three sentences above and even more types of what we can call anti-Americanism.

Jackson adopted Indians? I had no idea.

What I do know is, he and Davy Crocket were political rivals. For you see, Davy served under Jackson and objected how he treated the American Indian. Politically, however, Jackson destroyed Davy Crocket and essentially caused Davy to go to the nation of Texas where he tried to start over again, only to find himself at the Alamo.

Ironically, Jackson was the first Democrat President.

There is no question that racism has played a role throughout history, however. People as a baseline have a hard time embracing something different than what they are and skin color is obvious to ignore in this regard.

That is why in Europe they forced Jews to wear special garb. It was because they looked like everyone else, but they did not want to treat them like everyone else because they were different in other ways.

As a rule, race is only important for political purposes. Politics is the art of division based on groups trying to overpower other groups for their own benefit. Race is simply an easy way to draw lines around the groups.

In America, the white man was better armed and had an endless number of reinforcements in Europe as they immigrated to the US. That group then aligned itself against the natives to dominate their land. The native inhabitants had no chance to fight them off. They essentially immigrated them to death.

But today, the tables have turned. Now darker skinned people outnumber the white man, not only in the US but around the world. Now it is politically expedient to do the same to whitey as they did to people of color back in Jacksons day, which is why the democrats have changed their racism. Now it is bad to be whitey and cool to be a person of skin color. It is all about political power, the only thing democrats care about.

Democrats delve in truth, but just enough to turn it into a lie for their own political advantage.

 

[Auld Phart]

Let’s take a look at a few radical left-wing talking points. And trying to identify what year did they start becoming popular. 20 years ago? 40 years ago?

“We stole land from the Indian”

“White homeless people are privileged”

“Andrew Jackson was a racist”

I will bet that most Americans don’t agree with those talking points… most Americans understand that things like slavery, warfare and conquest were part of human history.

Those 3 points listed above are just three examples of radical left-wing views. Of course we also have those who believe in 100 different genders.

Again When did such language become part of the American experience? The whole white people are privileged is relatively new within the past few years. But those ideas like we stole land from the Indian or Andrew Jackson was a racist. I’m guessing was popular in the media/Hollywood 30 or 40 years ago?


Because if you look at history, whether it is the history of the Jew, the Indian, the black, the Asian they did all of the same things that the white European Christian man did. But for some reason in America, the media, Hollywood, and some of our politicians hype up those three sentences above and even more types of what we can call anti-Americanism.

it's like they never heard of the British Empire.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

Jackson adopted Indians? I had no idea.

What I do know is, he and Davy Crocket were political rivals. For you see, Davy served under Jackson and objected how he treated the American Indian. Politically, however, Jackson destroyed Davy Crocket and essentially caused Davy to go to the nation of Texas where he tried to start over again, only to find himself at the Alamo.

Ironically, Jackson was the first Democrat President.

There is no question that racism has played a role throughout history, however. People as a baseline have a hard time embracing something different than what they are and skin color is obvious to ignore in this regard.

That is why in Europe they forced Jews to wear special garb. It was because they looked like everyone else, but they did not want to treat them like everyone else because they were different in other ways.

As a rule, race is only important for political purposes. Politics is the art of division based on groups trying to overpower other groups for their own benefit. Race is simply an easy way to draw lines around the groups.

In America, the white man was better armed and had an endless number of reinforcements in Europe as they immigrated to the US. That group then aligned itself against the natives to dominate their land. The native inhabitants had no chance to fight them off. They essentially immigrated them to death.

But today, the tables have turned. Now darker skinned people outnumber the white man, not only in the US but around the world. Now it is politically expedient to do the same to whitey as they did to people of color back in Jacksons day, which is why the democrats have changed their racism. Now it is bad to be whitey and cool to be a person of skin color. It is all about political power, the only thing democrats care about.

Democrats delve in truth, but just enough to turn it into a lie for their own political advantage.

We are all descendants of slaves and slave owners. It’s perhaps the most critical point in the conversation. As there is a popularity in the media and Hollywood to proclaim a myth that America was the only country that practiced slavery or the white man is responsible for all the problems.

Yes, Andrew Jackson adopted two very young Indian boys… this was his Christian nature. There are a number of myths about the personality and character of Jackson. But we cannot deny that the man helped to expand the very country that we live in. When Andrew Jackson owned slaves, there were black Africans in Africa who owned white slaves. Point people is to put these things into historical context.


Racism was a part of history. But it became popular in the 19th century or so due to “scientific racism”. The use of science to attempt to divide people by race by looking at their skull sizes and things like that. But in the history of the ancient times or middle ages this was not really a part of life. religions played a role in bringing people together. There was some level of religious discrimination where minorities were casted out of their lands perhaps due to the criminal actions of some of those minority groups. But it wasn’t the rule. It was an exception.

We can even look at the Roman Empire, which included Africans, Arabs, Europeans in the highest positions of power. The Ottoman Empire having turks, Arabs, white Muslims in the highest positions of power.

As for the modern day …. Yes Democrats are mostly responsible for race division. But also it seems like Republicans don’t do enough to stop it or they even support it. Remember, a lot of Republicans supported George Floyd and wanted Derek Chauvin thrown to the wolves. But I think there’s hope for the future …left-wing BLM politics is experiencing a pushback. Free speech is now available on the platform X. We will see what happens but I think all of these left-wing arguments like supporting BLM, supporting the idea that whites are privileged, disparaging American history is not going to be popular in the long-term.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

Singapore is an example of a country with very successful multiculturalism. For all of the authoritarianism in Singapore their taxi drivers are making $300-$500 a day. It’s a country with extraordinarily clean streets a beautiful place, wonderful people. While visiting Singapore, I noticed these differences, whereas in America in some of the most popular places like in Los Angeles right by the LAX airport, the roads are filled with potholes and you see homeless people on the streets.


Could the race division brought to us mostly by Democrats be a distraction from our crumbling infrastructure? The problems that we face in America that other successful countries of the world don’t face? Hopefully more and more Americans will realize this, and we will see more pushback against left-wing identity politics and cancel culture.

 

[Votto]

We are all descendants of slaves and slave owners. It’s perhaps the most critical point in the conversation. As there is a popularity in the media and Hollywood to proclaim a myth that America was the only country that practiced slavery or the white man is responsible for all the problems.

Yes, Andrew Jackson adopted two very young Indian boys… this was his Christian nature. There are a number of myths about the personality and character of Jackson. But we cannot deny that the man helped to expand the very country that we live in. When Andrew Jackson owned slaves, there were black Africans in Africa who owned white slaves. Point people is to put these things into historical context.


Racism was a part of history. But it became popular in the 19th century or so due to “scientific racism”. The use of science to attempt to divide people by race by looking at their skull sizes and things like that. But in the history of the ancient times or middle ages this was not really a part of life. religions played a role in bringing people together. There was some level of religious discrimination where minorities were casted out of their lands perhaps due to the criminal actions of some of those minority groups. But it wasn’t the rule. It was an exception.

We can even look at the Roman Empire, which included Africans, Arabs, Europeans in the highest positions of power. The Ottoman Empire having turks, Arabs, white Muslims in the highest positions of power.

As for the modern day …. Yes Democrats are mostly responsible for race division. But also it seems like Republicans don’t do enough to stop it or they even support it. Remember, a lot of Republicans supported George Floyd and wanted Derek Chauvin thrown to the wolves. But I think there’s hope for the future …left-wing BLM politics is experiencing a pushback. Free speech is now available on the platform X. We will see what happens but I think all of these left-wing arguments like supporting BLM, supporting the idea that whites are privileged, disparaging American history is not going to be popular in the long-term.

From Wiki:

Jackson used the power of the federal government to enforce the separation of Indigenous tribes and whites.[225] In May 1830, Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act, which Congress had narrowly passed.[226] It gave the president the right to negotiate treaties to buy tribal lands in the eastern part of the United States in exchange for lands set aside for Native Americans west of the Mississippi,[227] as well as broad discretion on how to use the federal funds allocated to the negotiations.[228] The law was supposed to be a voluntary relocation program, but it was not implemented as one. Jackson's administration often achieved agreement to relocate through bribes, fraud and intimidation,[229] and the leaders who signed the treaties often did not represent the entire tribe.[230] The relocations could be a source of misery too: the Choctaw relocation was rife with corruption, theft, and mismanagement that brought great suffering to that people.[23

During his administration, he made about 70 treaties with American Indian tribes. He had removed almost all the Native Americans east of the Mississippi and south of Lake Michigan, about 70,000 people, from the United States;[239] though it was done at the cost of thousands of Native American lives lost because of the unsanitary conditions and epidemics arising from their dislocation, as well as their resistance to expulsion.[240] Jackson's implementation of the Indian Removal Act contributed to his popularity with his constituency. He added over 170,000 square miles of land to the public domain, which primarily benefited the United States' agricultural interests. The act also benefited small farmers, as Jackson allowed them to purchase moderate plots at low prices and offered squatters on land formerly belonging to Native Americans the option to purchase it before it was offered for sale to others.[2

 

[SurferH2O]

The Left has had an ongoing psyop through Government Education, bureaucracies, MSM, Entertainment, Social Media, etc. to really reduce and/or stop the critical thinking of a large portion of Americans.

Just today the House Judiciary Committee released a damning report with shocking details of corporate collusion to silence viewpoints that do not align with the Left through targeting and silencing opposition voices like Joe Rogan, Twitter, Breitbart, and many others. The Global Alliance for Responsible Media’s (GARM) Steer Team, may have violated antitrust laws in their efforts to deprive conservative media outlets and personalities as well as companies daring to platform alternative viewpoints of advertising dollars. They are literally silencing or reducing the voice of those that do not follow a Globalist / Big Government view.

We have government educators that push extreme Leftist views and the hiring of those that do not follow the Left in education is nearly non-existent. Anyone watching Netflix shows or other "main stream" entertainment are inundated with far Left views on sexuality, race, immigration, and more. The result has been the create of the "Left Cult" that will follow where commanded and believe and repeat what they are told. Barack Obama's Healthcare Architect, Jonathan Gruber straight up stated that they relied on these people to force through ACA (Obamacare) and her laughed at how stupid so many Americans were to fall for their lies.

ACA Architect: 'The Stupidity Of The American Voter' Led Us To Hide Obamacare's True Costs From The Public

You’ve got to hand it to MIT economist Jonathan Gruber. The guy dubbed the “Obamacare architect” is a viral YouTube sensation. A few months back, he was caught on tape admitting that Obamacare doesn’t provide subsidies for federally-run insurance exchanges; the topic of a new case before the...

www.forbes.com

I will close with this accurate depiction of what has happened.

 

[eagle7-31]

Let’s take a look at a few radical left-wing talking points. And trying to identify what year did they start becoming popular. 20 years ago? 40 years ago?

“We stole land from the Indian”

“White homeless people are privileged”

“Andrew Jackson was a racist”

I will bet that most Americans don’t agree with those talking points… most Americans understand that things like slavery, warfare and conquest were part of human history.

Those 3 points listed above are just three examples of radical left-wing views. Of course we also have those who believe in 100 different genders.

Again When did such language become part of the American experience? The whole white people are privileged is relatively new within the past few years. But those ideas like we stole land from the Indian or Andrew Jackson was a racist. I’m guessing was popular in the media/Hollywood 30 or 40 years ago?


Because if you look at history, whether it is the history of the Jew, the Indian, the black, the Asian they did all of the same things that the white European Christian man did. But for some reason in America, the media, Hollywood, and some of our politicians hype up those three sentences above and even more types of what we can call anti-Americanism.

Also Jackson was the last President to have a balanced budget and no national debt at the same time. That being some do question the trail of tears.