How likely is it that the FBI finally has indictment-worthy evidence against Hillary?

Little-Acorn

Gold Member
Jun 20, 2006
10,025
2,413
290
San Diego, CA
As mentioned in other threads, the FBI has sent a letter to Congress saying they are re-opening the criminal investigation of Hillary over her e-mails. Click the link below to see a copy of the letter.

Obviously the FBI will make no conclusions before the elections, and Democrats are so desperate that they will not change their votes for her based merely upon a re-opened criminal investigation. They are already convinced that she did nothing wrong, and any statement to the contrary is merely Republican troublemaking, not based on fact. Just ask them.

But in the real world, why do you think Comey would re-open an investigation where he has already declared Hillary committed no crimes, based on an (imaginary) need for "intent" along with the criminal action he acknowledges? Such a re-opening is HIGHLY unusual... to put it mildly.

His letter said that new emails have shown up, and they are re-opening the criminal investigation "to determine whether they contain classified information".

Yeah, right. That's like the captain of the Titanic putting lifeboats in the water "to determine whether there is any damage to the ship".

The FBI, probably including Comey himself, have already looked at enough of these "new" emails that they know for sure Hillary can and should - and probably will - be indicted. Nothing else would get him to re-open a case he has already (and very publicly) closed. Can you i9magine him re-opening this case, only to declare (again) that she did nothing wrong six months later?

The only questions now are: If Hillary wins the election and becomes President in January 2017, if the FBI presents enough enough evidence to indict AND CONVICT her... Would Congress impeach and convict her?

The answers:
Impeach (with simple majority vote of the House) maybe.
Convict (with 2/3 vote of the Senate) no way.

Hillary has won this battle. She has delayed, lied, destroyed evidence, refused subpoenas, etc., enough to delay any consequences until after the Nov. 2016 election. That was her complete, and only, goal.

If she wins the election, nothing else will matter to her. She might get indicted and even convicted by some kind of jury, 6 months to a year from now. But she won't be removed from office by an impeachment trial in the Senate. That is now the ONLY thing she's worried about. Being proven a criminal, and even a traitor to the country, is unimportant to her. Only gaining and keeping power to impose Big Govt on the rest of us, matters to her.

And if she wins the election , she's got it.


See a copy of the letter here:
Bradd Jaffy on Twitter
 
They have something, no way would they announce this at this time if they didn't
 
The FBI already had enough evidence. I would imagine that James Comney is facing so much rebellion within the ranks of his own investigators as well as with the Congress that he is afraid that he might face charges himself if he doesn't reopen the case. He has almost destroyed the credibility of the FBI as has Loretta Lynch destroyed the credibility of the Justice Department itself. Many of those who actually did the investigating are extremely pissed off at their boss. He has lost a ton of respect within his own agency.
 
How likely is it that the Trumpbots will start less than 100 duplicate threads about this?

lol

Why shouldn't they? Laws were actually broken. Matters of national security were made available to foreign governments. This matter is a lot more serious than the many posts concerning something Trump said fifteen years ago was and you Liberals ran under a log with that.
 
Democrats are so desperate that they will not change their votes for her based merely upon a re-opened criminal investigation. They are already convinced that she did nothing wrong, and any statement to the contrary is merely Republican troublemaking, not based on fact. Just ask them.
How likely is it that the Trumpbots will start less than 100 duplicate threads about this?
See? :biggrin:
 
Napolitano says it is most likely evidence of classified info being passed on her server..classified of a greater significance than any other previously discovered. We will not know before the election. President Trump will most likely make the announcement....from the wall.......lmbbffao!
 
Imo it was always extremely likely that Hillary knowingly and intentionally sent matl on her private server that was classified when she sent it. Proving intent was the problem.
 
Imo it was always extremely likely that Hillary knowingly and intentionally sent matl on her private server that was classified when she sent it. Proving intent was the problem.
"Intent" is not a factor according to the law.

Comey made that one up out of thin air, and used it to end the investigation. Or so he said in his speech.
 
As mentioned in other threads, the FBI has sent a letter to Congress saying they are re-opening the criminal investigation of Hillary over her e-mails. Click the link below to see a copy of the letter.

Obviously the FBI will make no conclusions before the elections, and Democrats are so desperate that they will not change their votes for her based merely upon a re-opened criminal investigation. They are already convinced that she did nothing wrong, and any statement to the contrary is merely Republican troublemaking, not based on fact. Just ask them.

But in the real world, why do you think Comey would re-open an investigation where he has already declared Hillary committed no crimes, based on an (imaginary) need for "intent" along with the criminal action he acknowledges? Such a re-opening is HIGHLY unusual... to put it mildly.

His letter said that new emails have shown up, and they are re-opening the criminal investigation "to determine whether they contain classified information".

Yeah, right. That's like the captain of the Titanic putting lifeboats in the water "to determine whether there is any damage to the ship".

The FBI, probably including Comey himself, have already looked at enough of these "new" emails that they know for sure Hillary can and should - and probably will - be indicted. Nothing else would get him to re-open a case he has already (and very publicly) closed. Can you i9magine him re-opening this case, only to declare (again) that she did nothing wrong six months later?

The only questions now are: If Hillary wins the election and becomes President in January 2017, if the FBI presents enough enough evidence to indict AND CONVICT her... Would Congress impeach and convict her?

The answers:
Impeach (with simple majority vote of the House) maybe.
Convict (with 2/3 vote of the Senate) no way.

Hillary has won this battle. She has delayed, lied, destroyed evidence, refused subpoenas, etc., enough to delay any consequences until after the Nov. 2016 election. That was her complete, and only, goal.

If she wins the election, nothing else will matter to her. She might get indicted and even convicted by some kind of jury, 6 months to a year from now. But she won't be removed from office by an impeachment trial in the Senate. That is now the ONLY thing she's worried about. Being proven a criminal, and even a traitor to the country, is unimportant to her. Only gaining and keeping power to impose Big Govt on the rest of us, matters to her.

And if she wins the election , she's got it.


See a copy of the letter here:
Bradd Jaffy on Twitter
What now fuck face? Huh? You ignorant Republicans.
 

Forum List

Back
Top