Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why just three?Bible says the universe had a beginning. Science caught up later and changed its beliefs to agree. So at some point life had to originate out of it. So if you want to keep God out of it, here’s your options on how life began.
Mix and match the 3 to whatever quantities you desire to create life:
1. View attachment 669725
2. Temperature
3. Time
Have at it.
Where does it say that?In Genesis the material universe already exists as earth, water, and darkness.
If some scientists said the universe had a beginning, then that's one theory. Other scientists don't make the same statement.Bible says the universe had a beginning.
So far, NOBODY said it was. So who are you responding to?"The bible says...." is not a reliable explanation for anything. It's just one of many creation tales, all of which were written by men in an age when fear and superstition were the norm.
First post in the thread. First sentence.So far, NOBODY said it was. So who are you responding to?
www.newscientist.com
True, but he was throwing out a QUESTION for discussion. That's not the same as repeatedly using it as an authority (even though it is)First post in the thread. First sentence.
No, the OP was throwing out a statement meant to discredit science.True, but he was throwing out a QUESTION for discussion. That's not the same as repeatedly using it as an authority (even though it is)
BUT. Jesus ONLY use, "The Scriptures say..." I do too
What’s the accepted theory that the universe has no beginning?If some scientists said the universe had a beginning, then that's one theory. Other scientists don't make the same statement.
It is entirely possible to science that there was no beginning and there will be no end.
Uh? Go read the OP.Why just three?
We know there are more than 3 elements comprising the human body.
Only a fool will say God and science don’t exist together.No, the OP was throwing out a statement meant to discredit science.
But that wasn't even correct to begin with.
Just as reliable as “Doug says”."The bible says...." is not a reliable explanation for anything. It's just one of many creation tales, all of which were written by men in an age when fear and superstition were the norm.
Must suck to be so miserable like you. But doesn’t address the OP.Is this what comes out of the rude awakening so many Americans had yesterday. A grasping for meaning in an afterlife? A grasping for meaning in their miserable lives in which they see the extremist politics disintegrating?
You’ve got the ingredients in the OP.Some people think abiogensis required help from magic.
I see no reason to think that, any more than I see reason to invoke magical fairies or sky daddies to explain the formation of a star, or a volcano.
That's a stupid question. Does not belong in a serious discussion.You’ve got the ingredients in the OP.
Tell me the one that’ll write a concerto.
It’s the crux of the topic.That's a stupid question. Does not belong in a serious discussion.
