How fanatical Marxist - Leninist Mao Killed More than WWI and II Combined

All we hear is Hitler Hitler Hitler Hitler. And very seldom Pol Pot, Ceausescu, Lenin-Stalin and Mao. This must change...
British Labour politician still serving as an MP and has done since 1987, said "on the balance of things, 🇨🇳 Mao did more good than bad". These people/views exist in The West even today...
 
All we hear is Hitler Hitler Hitler Hitler. And very seldom Pol Pot, Ceausescu, Lenin-Stalin and Mao. This must change...
British Labour politician still serving as an MP and has done since 1987, said "on the balance of things, 🇨🇳 Mao did more good than bad". These people/views exist in The West even today...
Hitler made the trains run on time, right?
 
Hitler made the trains run on time, right?
Hitler’s name dominates discussions of tyranny, while figures like Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ceaușescu, and Lenin often get sidelined—despite orchestrating mass killings, purges, and repression on staggering scales.

This skewed focus stems from Cold War politics, ideological bias, and cultural taboos. Western leftist narratives emphasized National - Socialist crimes (against humanity) while communist crimes against humanity (Like Kurapaty, Katyn´, Holodomor, etc.) were downplayed or politically inconvenient to highlight. Mao’s famines, Stalin’s gulags, Pol Pot’s genocide—these should be just as central to our collective memory.

It’s not about minimizing Hitler’s evil. It’s about expanding the lens so that all victims of totalitarian regimes are remembered. Historical honesty demands it.

Always remember: National Socialist Hitler, together with his Bolshevik ally Stalin, started World War II.

 
I suggest people also read 'The Private Life of Chairman Mao: The Memoirs of Mao's Personal Physician' by Li Zhisui. This book gives real insight into the man's grotesqueness. Marxist - Leninist Mao was psychoanalytically evil, I would say he bordered on insanity...still :
1757189742402.webp

GwdtdgPWEAAo-GO.webp
 
Last edited:
Hitler’s name dominates discussions of tyranny, while figures like Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ceaușescu, and Lenin often get sidelined—despite orchestrating mass killings, purges, and repression on staggering scales.

This skewed focus stems from Cold War politics, ideological bias, and cultural taboos. Western leftist narratives emphasized National - Socialist crimes (against humanity) while communist crimes against humanity (Like Kurapaty, Katyn´, Holodomor, etc.) were downplayed or politically inconvenient to highlight. Mao’s famines, Stalin’s gulags, Pol Pot’s genocide—these should be just as central to our collective memory.

It’s not about minimizing Hitler’s evil. It’s about expanding the lens so that all victims of totalitarian regimes are remembered. Historical honesty demands it.

Always remember: National Socialist Hitler, together with his Bolshevik ally Stalin, started World War II.


Fascist Hitler started WWII.

You know, our presidents favorite author.
 
Wrong—didn’t Hitler and Stalin attack the Polish Empire together?

context:


Hitler by that point had already invaded Austria and signed a pact after with Russia to decrease the cost of the Polish invasion.
 
So, how did the fascist rule of Hitler and Mussolini go?

Did the 1000 year reich last?
Very badly—like all totalitarian regimes. But that chapter is closed. After their defeat, the U.S. and the Free World occupied and rebuilt Italy and Germany through the Marshall Plan, transforming them into leading democratic nations.

Meanwhile, Marxism–Leninism continues to kill. In commie North Korea, Eastern Ukraine, and Communist Han-ruled China, we still see death camps, brutal repression, and expansionist aggression. Tibet and Eastern Turkistan remain occupied. Human rights violations are rampant. The ideology that promised liberation still delivers tyranny.

History moved on from fascism and national - socialism . Marxist-Leninist predatory imperialism hasn’t.





 
 
Hilarious


Fascism and Marxism are two very different ideologies.

Is TACOdaddy an authoritarian or a fascist ?
 
15th post
George Marshal was a failed general after WW1 and was appointed as COS of the Military by FDR apparently above more more more qualified candidates. His response to the Pearl Harbor attack is still under scrutiny. True to form he was appointed as Secy/State by Truman after the war. Maybe his appointment might have been the biggest mistake in modern history but the mainstream media media dubbed Marshall as "the citizen Soldier" Marshall was way out of his field of experience when he disarmed the loyalist Chinese military to pave the way for Mao's genocide but the liberal media writes the history books
 
Back
Top Bottom