How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

The entire climate science community all over the world isn't on board with the whole AGW schtick.
The published science says otherwise. Now, of course, you will claim that every refereed science journal is under the control of... who? Who do you believe in in charge of the conspiracy you see?
Those who are on board have their reasons for supporting the idea.
Yes they do. Valid, verifiable, falsifiable, scientific evidence. Mountains of it.
Fraud ? Silly question.
The very well-funded fraud being committed by the fossil fuel industry, modeled after the fraud committed by the tobacco industry and anti-evolution creationists, is not a silly topic of discussion. They are attempting to affect public policy through lies.
 
Last edited:
The published science says otherwise. Now, of course, you will claim that every refereed science journal is under the control of... who? Who do you believe in in charge of the conspiracy you see?

Yes they do. Valid, verifiable, falsifiable, scientific evidence. Mountains of it.

The very well-funded fraud being committed by the fossil fuel industry, modeled after the fraud committed by the tobacco industry and anti-evolution creationists, is not a silly topic of discussion. They are attempting to affect public policy through lies.

Exactly…
I still can’t get deniers to answer one question. Do they stop going to institutes like Johns Hopkins for cancer treatment advice when they found out that all these institutes are committing criminal fraud by knowing supplying false information to the govt while using federal grant money for climate change research as they claim ???
The-tobacco company I get, as they can give up smoking and grow their own pot.
 
The very well-funded fraud being committed by the fossil fuel industry, modeled after the fraud committed by the tobacco industry and anti-evolution creationists, is not a silly topic of discussion. They are attempting to affect public policy through lies.
Can you explain what it is the fossil fuel industry is supposedly doing?

Who is funding the peer reviewing science?
 
how many out of how many? How many scientist who disregard your nonsense are there?
They aren’t climate scientist of even scientists who disagree. And they’re not even scientists if they aren’t presentlyly doing any science research. All your references are not scientist if they are not doing research. Having done it 20 years ago doesn’t cut it.
You aren’t a military pilot either unless you presently fly for the military. So you’re making up shit.
 
They aren’t climate scientist of even scientists who disagree. And they’re not even scientists if they aren’t presentlyly doing any science research. All your references are not scientist if they are not doing research. Having done it 20 years ago doesn’t cut it.
You aren’t a military pilot either unless you presently fly for the military. So you’re making up shit.
But they are and still you poohpooh them, because they don’t fit your dishonest narrative
 
But they are and still you poohpooh them, because they don’t fit your dishonest narrative
You’re wrong again, again and again. Look up what a scientist is. It has nothing to do with his specialty. It has to do with his RESEARCH and what he/she is doing presently.
Your bozos aren’t scientists any more than you are…..choke.
 
You’re wrong again, again and again. Look up what a scientist is. It has nothing to do with his specialty. It has to do with his RESEARCH and what he/she is doing presently.
Your bozos aren’t scientists any more than you are…..choke.
yep, good for you, you know what science could be. Now name the science from any one of the supposed specialists in the IPCC list. Just post one, on what their contribution was, and if it isn't science it don't count right?

BTW, why don't you give me one of the names I posted and what that person was doing? Got any fking balls old fk?

Are you suggesting Judith Curry doesn't do science? Really?
 
Last edited:
You continually post made up drivel, each demonstrating how poorly informed you are.
what did I make up? I gave you friends of Heartland Institute, Friends of Science, Tom Nelson, both groups of scientists doing scientific research. Shut up and go cry in the corner.
 
what did I make up? I gave you friends of Heartland Institute, Friends of Science, Tom Nelson, both groups of scientists doing scientific research. Shut up and go cry in the corner.
They do no studies. Heartland institute does NO STUDIES ON CLIMATE ANYTHING.
 
They do no studies. Heartland institute does NO STUDIES ON CLIMATE ANYTHING.
What science does the IPCC do? Look at you trying to con me. Naw, Homey don't get conned, answer the question fk face!!
 
The published science says otherwise. Now, of course, you will claim that every refereed science journal is under the control of... who? Who do you believe in in charge of the conspiracy you see?

Yes they do. Valid, verifiable, falsifiable, scientific evidence. Mountains of it.

The very well-funded fraud being committed by the fossil fuel industry, modeled after the fraud committed by the tobacco industry and anti-evolution creationists, is not a silly topic of discussion. They are attempting to affect public policy through lies.

The published science says otherwise.

That works best when you stop skeptics from publishing.

Now, of course, you will claim that every refereed science journal is under the control of... who? Who do you believe in in charge of the conspiracy you see?

Why do you need a conspiracy?
Conspiracy: a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.

Was it a secret when John Clauser, a real Nobel Prize winner, had his
speech at the IMF canceled?

They are attempting to affect public policy through lies.

Outrageous! Only the AGW doomers are allowed to do that!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top