Uh, Space and nuclear decay are natural things, nobody "made" them.
And missiles go back to the 1800's and before. The British started to use rockets as early as 1804.
But the Germans really did not "invent" the technology they used to make the V-1 and V-2 missiles. Those were actually invented in the US by Robert Goddard. Even Wernher von Braun admitted as such, that all of his work was based on what Goddard had done before him. He simply had a nation that gave him huge amounts of money and resources, while Goddard only had a few private sponsors.
But almost the entire plan of the original version of the V-2 was taken from Goddard. Liquid fueled rockets, gyroscopic stabilization connected to stabilization fins, even basic navigation via such and timers to cut of fuel supplies at predetermined times. Those were all created by Goddard. Others simply improved upon them.
Which brings us to ...
...
Connections is a 10-episode
documentary television series and 1978 book (
Connections, based on the series) created, written, and presented by science historian
James Burke. The series was produced and directed by
Mick Jackson of the
BBC Science and Features Department and first aired in 1978 (UK) and 1979 (USA). It took an
interdisciplinary approach to the
history of science and
invention, and demonstrated how various discoveries, scientific achievements, and historical world events were built from one another successively in an interconnected way to bring about particular aspects of modern technology. The series was noted for Burke's crisp and enthusiastic presentation (and
dry humour),
historical re-enactments, and intricate working
models.
The popular success of the series led to the production of
The Day the Universe Changed (1985), a similar program but showing a more linear history of several important scientific developments. Years later, the success in syndication led to two sequels,
Connections2 (1994) and
Connections3 (1997), both for
TLC. In 2004,
KCSM-TV produced a program called
Re-Connections, consisting of an interview of Burke and highlights of the original series, for the 25th anniversary of the first broadcast in the USA on
PBS.
[1]
...
Connections explores an "Alternative View of Change" (the subtitle of the series) that rejects the conventional linear and
teleological view of historical progress. Burke contends that one cannot consider the development of any particular piece of the modern world in isolation. Rather, the entire
gestalt of the modern world is the result of a web of interconnected events, each one consisting of a person or group acting for reasons of their own motivations (e.g., profit, curiosity, religion) with no concept of the final, modern result to which the actions of either them or their contemporaries would lead. The interplay of the results of these isolated events is what drives history and innovation, and is also the main focus of the series and its sequels.
To demonstrate this view, Burke begins each episode with a particular event or innovation in the past (usually
ancient or
medieval times) and traces the path from that event through a series of seemingly unrelated connections to a fundamental and essential aspect of the modern world. For example, the episode "The Long Chain" traces the invention of plastics from the development of the
fluyt, a type of Dutch
cargo ship.
Burke also explores three
corollaries to his initial thesis. The first is that, if history is driven by individuals who act only on what they know at the time, and not because of any idea as to where their actions will eventually lead, then predicting the future course of technological progress is merely conjecture. Therefore, if we are astonished by the connections Burke is able to weave among past events, then we will be equally surprised to what the events of today eventually will lead, especially events of which we were not even aware at the time.
The second and third corollaries are explored most in the introductory and concluding episodes, and they represent the downside of an interconnected history. If history progresses because of the synergistic interaction of past events and innovations, then as history does progress, the number of these events and innovations increases. This increase in possible connections causes the process of innovation to not only continue, but also to accelerate. Burke poses the question of what happens when this rate of innovation, or more importantly "change" itself,
becomes too much for the average person to handle, and what this means for individual power, liberty, and privacy.
Lastly, if the entire modern world is built from these interconnected innovations, all increasingly maintained and improved by specialists who required years of training to gain their expertise, what chance does the average citizen without this extensive training have in making an informed decision on practical technological issues, such as the building of
nuclear power plants or the funding of controversial projects such as
stem cell research? Furthermore, if the modern world is increasingly interconnected, what happens when one of those nodes collapses? Does the entire system follow suit?
...
en.wikipedia.org
www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca
