How come there are over 40,000 christian denominations and more invented daily

[ding]

That was the point.
Why won't you answer the question?
What's the downside to being a Christian and thinking we are all created equal and are to help those in need?

I already believe we are all equal and that helping the needy is cool, and don't need guidance from an invisible being to do so, like you appear to?

Your beliefs are based upon feelings.
People's feelings vary all of the time, and rationalized easily no matter what the feelings are.

No, those are some of my core beliefs. Please try again.

These are your core beliefs.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Simply more proof that you live in a fantasy world. I'm here to help you, just relax and open your mind.

Well, I have already proven that:

1. Your hostility to religion is that of a rival religion.
2. You have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.
3. You have an external locus of control.
4. You worship science but are the first one to reject science.

So, I think I'm doing pretty well at proving my points. All I have seen from you is a nanny nanny boo boo of a response.

 

[ding]

Simply more proof that you live in a fantasy world. I'm here to help you, just relax and open your mind.

You mean like you own your own business? Fantasy like that? Are you ever going to say what kind of a business you own? Or are you still trying to figure out what lie to tell? Because from where I am sitting, I think you are sitting at a desk right now working at some job you hate trying not to get caught not doing your job.

 

[Mudda]

Simply more proof that you live in a fantasy world. I'm here to help you, just relax and open your mind.

You mean like you own your own business? Fantasy like that? Are you ever going to say what kind of a business you own? Or are you still trying to figure out what lie to tell? Because from where I am sitting, I think you are sitting at a desk right now working at some job you hate trying not to get caught not doing your job.

Out painting your fantasy world again? Good for you for having a hobby, but you might want to try a real one, like pretending to be a golfer.

 

[Mudda]

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

I thought I already explained this to you. Let me add emphasis so you can see where you erred.
Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

You made that up because you're homophobic. Get over it.

 

[ding]

Simply more proof that you live in a fantasy world. I'm here to help you, just relax and open your mind.

You mean like you own your own business? Fantasy like that? Are you ever going to say what kind of a business you own? Or are you still trying to figure out what lie to tell? Because from where I am sitting, I think you are sitting at a desk right now working at some job you hate trying not to get caught not doing your job.

Out painting your fantasy world again? Good for you for having a hobby, but you might want to try a real one, like pretending to be a golfer.

My index is a 12.5. I got as low as a 10.5. I will endeavor to persevere to get below a 10.

Now why don't you tell me about your fantasy of owning a business again?

 

[ding]

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

I thought I already explained this to you. Let me add emphasis so you can see where you erred.
Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

You made that up because you're homophobic. Get over it.

No. I'm not homophobic. I just don't believe it is in our society's best interest to define the rule through exception.

 

[Mudda]

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

I thought I already explained this to you. Let me add emphasis so you can see where you erred.
Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

You made that up because you're homophobic. Get over it.

No. I'm not homophobic. I just don't believe it is in our society's best interest to define the rule through exception.

So you don't see homos as being equal to you?

 

[ding]

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

I thought I already explained this to you. Let me add emphasis so you can see where you erred.
Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

You made that up because you're homophobic. Get over it.

No. I'm not homophobic. I just don't believe it is in our society's best interest to define the rule through exception.

So you don't see homos as being equal to you?

Of course they are. We are all equally worthless human beings.

 

[Mudda]

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

I thought I already explained this to you. Let me add emphasis so you can see where you erred.
Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

You made that up because you're homophobic. Get over it.

No. I'm not homophobic. I just don't believe it is in our society's best interest to define the rule through exception.

So you don't see homos as being equal to you?

Of course they are. We are all equally worthless human beings.

So then nature's laws are made for them as well. Thanks.

 

[ding]

I thought I already explained this to you. Let me add emphasis so you can see where you erred.
Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

You made that up because you're homophobic. Get over it.

No. I'm not homophobic. I just don't believe it is in our society's best interest to define the rule through exception.

So you don't see homos as being equal to you?

Of course they are. We are all equally worthless human beings.

So then nature's laws are made for them as well. Thanks.

Didn't I already answer that? Yes. Everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What does this have to do with defining the rule by exception?

 

[ding]

I thought I already explained this to you. Let me add emphasis so you can see where you erred.
Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

You made that up because you're homophobic. Get over it.

No. I'm not homophobic. I just don't believe it is in our society's best interest to define the rule through exception.

So you don't see homos as being equal to you?

Of course they are. We are all equally worthless human beings.

So then nature's laws are made for them as well. Thanks.

Look, I'm happy for you to be gay. Seriously. Go forth and be gay.

 

[Mudda]

You made that up because you're homophobic. Get over it.

No. I'm not homophobic. I just don't believe it is in our society's best interest to define the rule through exception.

So you don't see homos as being equal to you?

Of course they are. We are all equally worthless human beings.

So then nature's laws are made for them as well. Thanks.

Look, I'm happy for you to be gay. Seriously. Go forth and be gay.

Jesus was gay.

 

[ding]

No. I'm not homophobic. I just don't believe it is in our society's best interest to define the rule through exception.

So you don't see homos as being equal to you?

Of course they are. We are all equally worthless human beings.

So then nature's laws are made for them as well. Thanks.

Look, I'm happy for you to be gay. Seriously. Go forth and be gay.

Jesus was gay.

Do you even believe Jesus existed?

 

[kjw47]

The Center for the Study of Global Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary estimated 34,000 denominations in 2000, rising to an estimated 43,000 in 2012. These numbers have exploded from 1,600 in the year 1900.

so which one is the one "true" church?

The one that looks at facts--From Moses on up until this very day--they taught, served and worshipped a single being God named-YHWH(Jehovah) and the true religion today accept the one sent forth by God -the Messiah= Jesus. Yes maybe 40,000 of them claiming to be Christian, but what does the bible teach? Mark 3:24-26-- a house divided( 33,997trinity religions) will not stand.
1Cor 1:10-- unity of thought-no division= one single religion has Jesus as its head.

So which church is that?

The one that teaches --every utterance from God.

 

[Mudda]

The Center for the Study of Global Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary estimated 34,000 denominations in 2000, rising to an estimated 43,000 in 2012. These numbers have exploded from 1,600 in the year 1900.

so which one is the one "true" church?

The one that looks at facts--From Moses on up until this very day--they taught, served and worshipped a single being God named-YHWH(Jehovah) and the true religion today accept the one sent forth by God -the Messiah= Jesus. Yes maybe 40,000 of them claiming to be Christian, but what does the bible teach? Mark 3:24-26-- a house divided( 33,997trinity religions) will not stand.
1Cor 1:10-- unity of thought-no division= one single religion has Jesus as its head.

So which church is that?

The one that teaches --every utterance from God.

Are you homeless?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Yes, prove the Bible is wrong.

I'm not surprised you have not heard of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. Unbelievers tend to not have much knowledge of science.

I like to keep up with the latest discoveries in the life sciences. The more we learn, the more it looks really bad for a naturalistic origin of life. In fact, information theory proves that information, such as that contained in human languages and DNA, are the result of intelligent minds. It cannot evolve on it's own. It is the sole province of intelligent agents.

I think what you are trying to say is that DNA coding did not likely self assemble itself.

Confining the Debates

Intelligent Design can also mean design itself through its own intelligence. Evolution was a choice. Today, we are choosing to evolve backwards. Because our leaders want to tame us, we, and later even they, will be overrun by those who were born backwards.

Aggressive Christianity seeks to monopolize debates on design, homosexuality, and abortion. But ethical determinations could be presented secularly. Those on the other side also want to limit their opponents to Fundamentalists.

Aggressive Christianity seeks to monopolize debates on design, homosexuality, and abortion. But ethical determinations could be presented secularly. Those on the other side also want to limit their opponents to Fundamentalists.

The secular evolutionist position is that murder. rape, killing of the handicapped and infirm must be good as it improves the strength of the species..

No, it's not a common position and certainly not a mainstream position, even if you can find some fringe person who believes it. and no it doesn't improve the strength of the species.

Cooperation is far superior

Prometheus Unchained

Ants and bees cooperate. The answer for us is not that; it is intelligence. High IQs created everything that has prevented man from living like wild animals, a life that was filthy, terrifying, painful, and short. They also created all of the plutocrats' wealth, which is why people are manipulated into despising smart kids and the most intelligent are brainwashed into despising themselves.

abeautifulmind.proboards.com

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Sure it is. So what? Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

Diversity Is Perversity

All you are pointing out is that nature created impurities, deformities, and toxicities. Intelligence weeds them out. Intelligence never accepts what mindless nature imposes on us.

Theists believe without proof. What is worse but loudly preached as better, New Age religion believes what has been obviously disproven. Forced to choose between only those two, we have to accept religion in order to survive.

 

[ding]

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

Diversity Is Perversity

All you are pointing out is that nature created impurities, deformities, and toxicities. Intelligence weeds them out. Intelligence never accepts what mindless nature imposes on us.

Theists believe without proof. What is worse but loudly preached as better, New Age religion believes what has been obviously disproven. Forced to choose between only those two, we have to accept religion in order to survive.

“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports...In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens...”

The Will of the People: Readings in American Democracy (Chicago: Great Books Foundation, 2001), 38.

“…And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion...reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”

The Will of the People: Readings in American Democracy (Chicago: Great Books Foundation, 2001), 38.

“Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand.” John Adams Letter of June 21, 1776, quoted in The Wall Builder Report, Summer 1993

The Works of John Adams – Second President of theUnited States, ed. Charles Francis Adams (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1854), 9:401.

“Religion and good morals are the only solid foundations of public liberty and happiness.”

Paul H. Smith, Gerard W. Gawalt, Rosemary Fry Plakes, et. al., Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774-1789, volume 11, October 1 1778-January 31 1779.

 

[ding]

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

Diversity Is Perversity

All you are pointing out is that nature created impurities, deformities, and toxicities. Intelligence weeds them out. Intelligence never accepts what mindless nature imposes on us.

Theists believe without proof. What is worse but loudly preached as better, New Age religion believes what has been obviously disproven. Forced to choose between only those two, we have to accept religion in order to survive.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

“More than half a century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of older people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: ‘Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.’”


“Since then I have spent well-nigh fifty years working on the history of our Revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies,

and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval...But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous Revolution that swallowed up some sixty million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: "Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.’”


“Templeton Lecture, May 10, 1983,” in The Solzhenitsyn Reader: New and Essential Writings, 1947-2005, eds. Edward E. Ericson, Jr. and Daniel J. Mahoney (Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2006), 577

 

[Mudda]

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

Diversity Is Perversity

All you are pointing out is that nature created impurities, deformities, and toxicities. Intelligence weeds them out. Intelligence never accepts what mindless nature imposes on us.

Theists believe without proof. What is worse but loudly preached as better, New Age religion believes what has been obviously disproven. Forced to choose between only those two, we have to accept religion in order to survive.

“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports...In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens...”

The Will of the People: Readings in American Democracy (Chicago: Great Books Foundation, 2001), 38.

“…And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion...reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”

The Will of the People: Readings in American Democracy (Chicago: Great Books Foundation, 2001), 38.

“Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand.” John Adams Letter of June 21, 1776, quoted in The Wall Builder Report, Summer 1993

The Works of John Adams – Second President of theUnited States, ed. Charles Francis Adams (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1854), 9:401.

“Religion and good morals are the only solid foundations of public liberty and happiness.”

Paul H. Smith, Gerard W. Gawalt, Rosemary Fry Plakes, et. al., Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774-1789, volume 11, October 1 1778-January 31 1779.

I think you're in the wrong thread, "Irrelevant Quotes" is two threads over.