How big a threat to our nation is liberalism?

[Remodeling Maidiac]

On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the biggest threat & 1 being no threat, where do you place liberalism in America?

 

[thanatos144]

Liberalism isn't the problem. It is regressivism...AKK the progressives. There is nothing progressive or liberal about them. and it is very dangerous because it by its very nature must prop up evil and denigrate good. Because if all things are equal Good must be evil and evil must be good.

 

[ding]

On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the biggest threat & 1 being no threat, where do you place liberalism in America?

Biggest threat. Liberalism is inevitably pushed aside by radicalism, radicalism has to surrender to socialism, and socialism will never be able to resist communism.

Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion. The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. They worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes. They can be identified by an external locus of control. Their religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. They practice critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what they do not believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever having to examine what they believe.

 

[Stratford57]

As long as Soros is brainwashing, controlling and directing almost all the liberals, it appears to be a huge threat to the country. Looks like he's preparing his troops of brainwashed sheep for a coup.

FYI, the steps Soros used in Ukraine in 2014 to pull out a coup:
1. brainwashed the people;
2. divided the country;
3. bribed "the opposition" to the legitimate government and President;
4. sponsored a lot of "protests" and made Media broadcast them all over the world as much as possible;
5. the coup.

Looks like first 4 steps are already done and #5 is coming up.

 

[owebo]

Liberalism is a big league threat.......

 

[JakeStarkey]

a hen party ^^^

 

[AntonToo]

Some of that dangerous, radical liberal enlightenment that's been ruining this country since inception: "All men are created equal"

 

[thanatos144]

Some of that dangerous, radical liberal enlightenment that will end this country any day now: "All men are created equal"

Notice how it does not say all men are equal. Just created that way... Equality of opportunity not result...

 

[MACAULAY]

On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the biggest threat & 1 being no threat, where do you place liberalism in America?

Biggest threat. Liberalism is inevitably pushed aside by radicalism, radicalism has to surrender to socialism, and socialism will never be able to resist communism.

Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion. The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. They worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes. They can be identified by an external locus of control. Their religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. They practice critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what they do not believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever having to examine what they believe.

________________________

Here is a debate post.

A response by the Democrat/Bolsheviks who post on this board is impossible...they cannot do it. They don't have sufficient education or intellect.

Might get a few like:

Racist!

Bigot!

Nutter!

Any of that genre which pervades Liberal responses on this board. Most will just run from it. A well stated argument like this on this board can kill a thread.

______

 

[Norman]

Liberalism isn't the problem. It is regressivism...AKK the progressives. There is nothing progressive or liberal about them. and it is very dangerous because it by its very nature must prop up evil and denigrate good. Because if all things are equal Good must be evil and evil must be good.

Unfortunately it seems as though every liberal has become regressive and the rest have abandoned ship. Liberalism today, is the cryptonite to first world.

 

[AntonToo]

Some of that dangerous, radical liberal enlightenment that will end this country any day now: "All men are created equal"

Notice how it does not say all men are equal. Just created that way... Equality of opportunity not result...

Still, threw a major wrench into slavery and later segregation, almost destroyed the country. It's liberal interpretation to include women's suffrage was a pain in the ass too.

 

[Mac1958]

Liberalism, 0.

Progressivism, 8.
.

 

[ding]

On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the biggest threat & 1 being no threat, where do you place liberalism in America?

Biggest threat. Liberalism is inevitably pushed aside by radicalism, radicalism has to surrender to socialism, and socialism will never be able to resist communism.

Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion. The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. They worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes. They can be identified by an external locus of control. Their religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. They practice critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what they do not believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever having to examine what they believe.

________________________

Here is a debate post.

A response by the Democrat/Bolsheviks who post on this board is impossible...they cannot do it. They don't have sufficient education or intellect.

Might get a few like:

Racist!

Bigot!

Nutter!

Any of that genre which pervades Liberal responses on this board. Most will just run from it. A well stated argument like this on this board can kill a thread.

______

I have yet to find one who has.

 

[AntonToo]

Liberalism, 0.

Progressivism, 8.
.

Yea, that Social Security and anti-trust laws are destroying this country.

 

[Mac1958]

Liberalism, 0. Progressivism, 8.

Yea, that Social Security and anti-trust laws are destroying this country.

We're talking about today, not generations ago.
.

 

[AntonToo]

Liberalism, 0. Progressivism, 8.

Yea, that Social Security and anti-trust laws are destroying this country.

We're talking about today, not generations ago.
.

Yes yes, you always do.

TODAY Progressives are dangerous...everyday for the last 100 years, according to conservatives.

Well here is the bottom line - this country is not in danger from ideas of people who respect the political process, peaceful transfer of power and separation of powers among the three branches of government - be they liberal or conservative or satanist.

 

[thanatos144]

Some of that dangerous, radical liberal enlightenment that will end this country any day now: "All men are created equal"

Notice how it does not say all men are equal. Just created that way... Equality of opportunity not result...

Still, threw a major wrench into slavery and later segregation, almost destroyed the country. It's liberal interpretation to include women's suffrage was a pain in the ass too.

Yes it does tend to fuck up long held Democrat beliefs of racism and sexism as the founders intended. By the way if woman's suffrage was about equality then why is it they didn't have to sign up for the draft for the right to vote like men had to????? That doesn't sound like suffering to me that sounds like privilege.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Some of that dangerous, radical liberal enlightenment that's been ruining this country since inception: "All men are created equal"

Nope. That was what we today call "conservatism" where the individual took precedence over the State.

Conservatives today were the Jeffersonian Liberals of the late 18th century.

 

[thanatos144]

Liberalism, 0.

Progressivism, 8.
.

Yea, that Social Security and anti-trust laws are destroying this country.

Actually social security is part of what is destroying the country.

 

[AntonToo]

Some of that dangerous, radical liberal enlightenment that will end this country any day now: "All men are created equal"

Notice how it does not say all men are equal. Just created that way... Equality of opportunity not result...

Still, threw a major wrench into slavery and later segregation, almost destroyed the country. It's liberal interpretation to include women's suffrage was a pain in the ass too.

Yes it does tend to fuck up long held Democrat beliefs of racism and sexism as the founders intended. By the way if woman's suffrage was about equality then why is it they didn't have to sign up for the draft for the right to vote like men had to????? That doesn't sound like suffering to me that sounds like privilege.

nonsense, Democrats certainly do not generally hold those beliefs.

As far as draft, you mean women, Donald Trump, Bush and Clinton?