How am I a fascist?

[Marener]

Why do you keep speaking in generalities?

Regarding what?

There’s numerous examples. What he’s doing to Harvard is one such example.

 

[Missourian]

If you want to change the subject, start a new thread and tag me. I'll be happy to respond.

Or you can just run away. Your choice.

I've given you the Democrat definition of Fascism TWICE.

Third time's a charm...

Democrats definition of Fascist is whatever the Democrats need it to be.

It currently means anyone who doesn't let Democrats do whatever they want whenever they want, like forcing people to buy EVs, killing unborn children days before birth, cutting my off kids genitals and allowing bearded men in female only spaces.

And stupid ass low IQ voter shit like this.







Now where's yours? I'll wait.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Name calling without cause is called slander.

or journalism.

 

[dblack]

I've given you the Democrat definition of Fascism TWICE.

Third time's a charm...

Democrats definition of Fascist is whatever the Democrats need it to be.

Now where's yours? I'll wait.

Here's the definition you're looking for:

Denial

Denial is a defense mechanism in which an individual refuses to recognize or acknowledge objective facts or experiences. It’s an unconscious process that serves to protect the person from discomfort or anxiety. For example, a loved one may insist that she doesn’t have a problem with alcohol...

www.psychologytoday.com

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Far-right?

What does that even mean? Why not just define it as being MAGA?



Looking at the rest of your definition, "Characterized by a strong central authority, suppression of opposition, and the subordination of the individual interests to the nation", this is all Leftwing stuff.

And opposition to democracy, just ask Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders how democratic the DNC really is.

Where did you get opposition to socialism when the Nazi regime called themselves National socialists?

We know, you just want to trash everyone that is not a socialist like yourself because socialism is all about an oppressive centralized authority.

Pathetic.

Try again.

Just look at this ignorant chart on the Left vs. right political scale.

View attachment 1125977

What does the scale even measure? Nothing is what it measures.

Conversely, a scale that measures central authority, which is at the heart of fascism, looks like this

View attachment 1125980

I would argue, however, that anarchists are Left wing because anarchy always leads to authoritarianism, which is what the Left is all about.

We didn't try to overthrow the government or steal elections.
That's what Trump and his cult did.
There's your anarchy.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

No no. It’s you. I don’t have a dear leader.

Yes you do.
Why do you defend him?

That’s just another one of your stupid propaganda memes.

You’re. A dopey ineffectual troll.

There's your troll.
Trolling his cult and they demand more.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

It's always cute when kids define words using arbitrary framing devices in such a way that they cannot qualify.

We know.............

Trump Calls Groceries an 'Old-Fashioned' Word: 'A Bag ...​

People.com
https://people.com › trump-calls-groceries-old-fashione...
Apr 3, 2025 — “It's such an old-fashioned term but a beautiful term: groceries," he mused. "It sort of says a bag with different things in it."

 

[Votto]

We know.............

Trump Calls Groceries an 'Old-Fashioned' Word: 'A Bag ...​

View attachment 1126335
People.com
https://people.com › trump-calls-groceries-old-fashione...
Apr 3, 2025 — “It's such an old-fashioned term but a beautiful term: groceries," he mused. "It sort of says a bag with different things in it."

Let's get back to your definition of fascism and recap.

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian ultranationalist political ideology and movement. It's characterized by strong central authority, suppression of opposition, and the subordination of individual interests to the nation, often with militaristic and expansionist goals. Fascism is fundamentally opposed to democracy, liberalism, and socialism.

To date, I have already declared I am against centralized authority by in large, so as such, I'm no fascist by your own standards. As I have said, I wish more people would investigate the Article V movement which seeks to return power to the states and remove it from the Swamp Leviathan like it used to be.

As for wanting to defend national interests, I just assumed that is what politicians were supposed to do. I suppose that being a globalists/socialists you have a big problem with this and wish that your representatives represent other people with other interests than legal voters who put them into office.

Whatever.

As for militaristic expansion, Trump is the first President in a long time not to start war. In fact, ever since Wilson and FDR put the US in military mode after the two world wars, the US has been at war with the entire world without actually declaring war officially. I don't support this either, but hey, ignore that the two Presidents who started all this were democrats, just for fun. And ignore LBJ who created a real war in Vietnam but refusing to declare one, and all of false pretenses.

As for democracy, the Article V movement returns power to the states, which means that your vote goes further because those who have real power over you reside in your state and not in the distant Swamp. You also have better access to them, which means odds are that they won't be a drooling vegetable in office with an autopen controlled by God only knows who. And they won't remove them from their nomination mysteriously after being democratically elected to win their seat. Things like that will enhance democracy, not curb it.

As for opposing socialism, how is that a defining characteristic of being a fascist?

Again, whatever.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Look up the tenents of fascism OP.

Stop being an idiot.

That's a stellar answer!

 

[Votto]

That's a stellar answer!

Halfwit socialists are presented with a problem when asked to define fascism. It is because they must admit that a fascist wants centralized and unquestioned authority. But this is something that their political ideology demands. So, they rely on additional definitions, such as being a nationalist to evade the term from sticking to them, or saying they don't care about anyone's traditions, etc. But their real danger stems from their centralized and unquestioned authority, something we all got a good taste of during the Covid crisis and one Joe Biden. Being told to stay in your home because you are not deemed "essential" by the state? Really? Being told you are required to take the jab or lose your job or you can't have an education, and then taking the jab and having adverse reactions to it or dying from it and not being compensated by the state? Really? Or how about the state telling you that you can't see your dying loved one that is dying from Covid? Or how about these fools robbing you of your First amendment rights to freely assemble or talk about your bad experiences with the jab on social media?

Yea, people like Mac love this sort of thing and want more of it, which is centralized unquestioned authority over all of us. Why? Cuz they be the experts don't ya know!!

 

[dblack]

Halfwit socialists are presented with a problem when asked to define fascism. It is because they must admit that a fascist wants centralized and unquestioned authority. But this is something that their political ideology demands. So, they rely on additional definitions, such as being a nationalist to evade the term from sticking to them, or saying they don't care about anyone's traditions, etc. But their real danger stems from their centralized and unquestioned authority, something we all got a good taste of during the Covid crisis and one Joe Biden. Being told to stay in your home because you are not deemed "essential" by the state? Really? Being told you are required to take the jab or lose your job or you can't have an education, and then taking the jab and having adverse reactions to it or dying from it and not being compensated by the state? Really? Or how about the state telling you that you can't see your dying loved one that is dying from Covid? Or how about these fools robbing you of your First amendment rights to freely assemble or talk about your bad experiences with the jab on social media?

Yea, people like Mac love this sort of thing and want more of it, which is centralized unquestioned authority over all of us. Why? Cuz they be the experts don't ya know!!

 

[Marener]

Halfwit socialists are presented with a problem when asked to define fascism. It is because they must admit that a fascist wants centralized and unquestioned authority. But this is something that their political ideology demands. So, they rely on additional definitions, such as being a nationalist to evade the term from sticking to them, or saying they don't care about anyone's traditions, etc. But their real danger stems from their centralized and unquestioned authority, something we all got a good taste of during the Covid crisis and one Joe Biden. Being told to stay in your home because you are not deemed "essential" by the state? Really? Being told you are required to take the jab or lose your job or you can't have an education, and then taking the jab and having adverse reactions to it or dying from it and not being compensated by the state? Really? Or how about the state telling you that you can't see your dying loved one that is dying from Covid? Or how about these fools robbing you of your First amendment rights to freely assemble or talk about your bad experiences with the jab on social media?

Yea, people like Mac love this sort of thing and want more of it, which is centralized unquestioned authority over all of us. Why? Cuz they be the experts don't ya know!!

Authoritarianism is a trait of fascism, but it’s also shared with other political ideologies.

You can’t define fascism as authoritarianism because it’s more complicated than that and your definition would be overly broad.

Even liberal states will take authoritarian steps when dealing with a national emergency. The question is whether those steps are rolled back when the crisis is over. In fascist states, they often maintain emergency powers even when there’s no real emergency other than the ones they invent.

 

[Mac1958]

Here's the definition you're looking for:

Denial

Denial is a defense mechanism in which an individual refuses to recognize or acknowledge objective facts or experiences. It’s an unconscious process that serves to protect the person from discomfort or anxiety. For example, a loved one may insist that she doesn’t have a problem with alcohol...

www.psychologytoday.com

They hate being held to definitions.

I wonder why.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Let's get back to your definition of fascism and recap.

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian ultranationalist political ideology and movement. It's characterized by strong central authority, suppression of opposition, and the subordination of individual interests to the nation, often with militaristic and expansionist goals. Fascism is fundamentally opposed to democracy, liberalism, and socialism.

To date, I have already declared I am against centralized authority by in large, so as such, I'm no fascist by your own standards. As I have said, I wish more people would investigate the Article V movement which seeks to return power to the states and remove it from the Swamp Leviathan like it used to be.

As for wanting to defend national interests, I just assumed that is what politicians were supposed to do. I suppose that being a globalists/socialists you have a big problem with this and wish that your representatives represent other people with other interests than legal voters who put them into office.

Whatever.

As for militaristic expansion, Trump is the first President in a long time not to start war.

Trump is contemplating on behalf of Israel.
Bibi will reel him in.
Clinton never started a war.

In fact, ever since Wilson and FDR put the US in military mode after the two world wars, the US has been at war with the entire world without actually declaring war officially. I don't support this either, but hey, ignore that the two Presidents who started all this were democrats, just for fun. And ignore LBJ who created a real war in Vietnam but refusing to declare one, and all of false pretenses.

WTF.
Bush started the longest war in US history.

As for democracy, the Article V movement returns power to the states, which means that your vote goes further because those who have real power over you reside in your state and not in the distant Swamp.

Sure.......... like over riding California and installing US troops?

You also have better access to them, which means odds are that they won't be a drooling vegetable in office with an autopen controlled by God only knows who.

Sure beats having a blithering idiot in charge of ANYTHING, let alone the US presidency.

And they won't remove them from their nomination mysteriously after being democratically elected to win their seat. Things like that will enhance democracy, not curb it.

No, it doesn't.
Lyndon Johnson did.
Harry Truman did.
Calvin Coolidge did.
Rutherford Hayes did.
James Polk did.

As for opposing socialism, how is that a defining characteristic of being a fascist?

I just posted it.
WOW.

Again, whatever.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Authoritarianism is a trait of fascism, but it’s also shared with other political ideologies.

You can’t define fascism as authoritarianism because it’s more complicated than that and your definition would be overly broad.

Even liberal states will take authoritarian steps when dealing with a national emergency. The question is whether those steps are rolled back when the crisis is over. In fascist states, they often maintain emergency powers even when there’s no real emergency other than the ones they invent.

You mean like the government monitoring and censoring social media? That kind of "Authoritarianism"?

 

[Votto]

Authoritarianism is a trait of fascism, but it’s also shared with other political ideologies.

You can’t define fascism as authoritarianism because it’s more complicated than that and your definition would be overly broad.

Even liberal states will take authoritarian steps when dealing with a national emergency. The question is whether those steps are rolled back when the crisis is over. In fascist states, they often maintain emergency powers even when there’s no real emergency other than the ones they invent.

I think Rahm Emmanual, one of Obama's goons during the credit crisis once said, "Never let a good crisis go to waste."

​ ​ ​ Herbert Hoover, quotes about Nazi: Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains.​

 

[Votto]

You mean like the government monitoring and censoring social media? That kind of "Authoritarianism"?

No, no, no, just the Orange kind silly.

 

[Marener]

You mean like the government monitoring and censoring social media? That kind of "Authoritarianism"?

Kind of.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html

 

[Marener]

I think Rahm Emmanual, one of Obama's goons during the credit crisis once said, "Never let a good crisis go to waste."

Quite a shallow response unless you can go on to explain how it was put into effect.

 

[Votto]

Kind of.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html

Was the government telling Twitter to censor the Hunter Biden laptop scandal as Russin disinformation right before a Presidential election a good thing, especially considering about 20% of voters after the election said they would not have voted for Biden had they known about the scandal?

And was that tampering with an election?