The point is that Employers should be covering the cost of wages, simply because they get tax breaks for it.
How is my post "in a vacuum"?
If Social Services are $14.00 per hour, something you've never supported with a reliable source and link. What would it go to if all wages increased 100%?
.walter e. williams:
- While legislative bodies have the power to order wage increases, they have not as of yet found a way to order commensurate increases in worker productivity that make the worker’s output worth the higher wage.
- Further, while Congress can legislate the wage at which labor transactions occur, it cannot require that the transaction actually be made, and the worker hired.
dude; Congress Fixes the Standard of Values in our Republic. The right wing has nothing but fallacy, in that regard.
The Standard of weights and measures.
I actually read our Constitution. the right wing just makes stuff up.
ArchiveThe point is that Employers should be covering the cost of wages, simply because they get tax breaks for it.
How is my post "in a vacuum"?
If Social Services are $14.00 per hour, something you've never supported with a reliable source and link. What would it go to if all wages increased 100%?
.walter e. williams:
- While legislative bodies have the power to order wage increases, they have not as of yet found a way to order commensurate increases in worker productivity that make the worker’s output worth the higher wage.
- Further, while Congress can legislate the wage at which labor transactions occur, it cannot require that the transaction actually be made, and the worker hired.
Anything less than fourteen dollars an hour is being subsidized by the public. Why do Employers who are in it for a Profit, get subsidized with "cheap labor"?
New Cities!
Higher paid labor, pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. And, recent studies on quality of life put California at the bottom due to cost of living issues. A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage merely adjusts that ratio, to help improve our standing in that study.ArchiveThe point is that Employers should be covering the cost of wages, simply because they get tax breaks for it.
How is my post "in a vacuum"?
If Social Services are $14.00 per hour, something you've never supported with a reliable source and link. What would it go to if all wages increased 100%?
.walter e. williams:
- While legislative bodies have the power to order wage increases, they have not as of yet found a way to order commensurate increases in worker productivity that make the worker’s output worth the higher wage.
- Further, while Congress can legislate the wage at which labor transactions occur, it cannot require that the transaction actually be made, and the worker hired.
Anything less than fourteen dollars an hour is being subsidized by the public. Why do Employers who are in it for a Profit, get subsidized with "cheap labor"?
Implications for California
About 98% of the crop workers on California farms, and 58% of crop workers on farms outside California, were born abroad. Table 1 shows that the share of foreign-born crop workers who are unauthorized, 68%, is similar in California and the rest of the United States; however, since 98% of California's crop workers are foreign-born, California has a higher-than-average share of unauthorized workers than most other states.
California crop workers had lower average hourly earnings and fewer days of farm work in the past year than crop workers outside California. U.S.-born workers earned more than foreign-born workers, but the premium for U.S.-born workers was almost $2 an hour in California and less than $1 an hour in the rest of the United States. A full-time worker employed 5 days a week for 50 weeks has 250 days of work; the average crop worker had almost 200 days of farm work in the year before being interviewed.
People making 50k a year are living in tents...........That's not the problem.Higher paid labor, pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. And, recent studies on quality of life put California at the bottom due to cost of living issues. A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage merely adjusts that ratio, to help improve our standing in that study.ArchiveThe point is that Employers should be covering the cost of wages, simply because they get tax breaks for it.
How is my post "in a vacuum"?
If Social Services are $14.00 per hour, something you've never supported with a reliable source and link. What would it go to if all wages increased 100%?
.walter e. williams:
- While legislative bodies have the power to order wage increases, they have not as of yet found a way to order commensurate increases in worker productivity that make the worker’s output worth the higher wage.
- Further, while Congress can legislate the wage at which labor transactions occur, it cannot require that the transaction actually be made, and the worker hired.
Anything less than fourteen dollars an hour is being subsidized by the public. Why do Employers who are in it for a Profit, get subsidized with "cheap labor"?
Implications for California
About 98% of the crop workers on California farms, and 58% of crop workers on farms outside California, were born abroad. Table 1 shows that the share of foreign-born crop workers who are unauthorized, 68%, is similar in California and the rest of the United States; however, since 98% of California's crop workers are foreign-born, California has a higher-than-average share of unauthorized workers than most other states.
California crop workers had lower average hourly earnings and fewer days of farm work in the past year than crop workers outside California. U.S.-born workers earned more than foreign-born workers, but the premium for U.S.-born workers was almost $2 an hour in California and less than $1 an hour in the rest of the United States. A full-time worker employed 5 days a week for 50 weeks has 250 days of work; the average crop worker had almost 200 days of farm work in the year before being interviewed.
People making 50k a year are living in tents...........That's not the problem.Higher paid labor, pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. And, recent studies on quality of life put California at the bottom due to cost of living issues. A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage merely adjusts that ratio, to help improve our standing in that study.ArchiveThe point is that Employers should be covering the cost of wages, simply because they get tax breaks for it.How is my post "in a vacuum"?
If Social Services are $14.00 per hour, something you've never supported with a reliable source and link. What would it go to if all wages increased 100%?
.walter e. williams:
- While legislative bodies have the power to order wage increases, they have not as of yet found a way to order commensurate increases in worker productivity that make the worker’s output worth the higher wage.
- Further, while Congress can legislate the wage at which labor transactions occur, it cannot require that the transaction actually be made, and the worker hired.
Anything less than fourteen dollars an hour is being subsidized by the public. Why do Employers who are in it for a Profit, get subsidized with "cheap labor"?
Implications for California
About 98% of the crop workers on California farms, and 58% of crop workers on farms outside California, were born abroad. Table 1 shows that the share of foreign-born crop workers who are unauthorized, 68%, is similar in California and the rest of the United States; however, since 98% of California's crop workers are foreign-born, California has a higher-than-average share of unauthorized workers than most other states.
California crop workers had lower average hourly earnings and fewer days of farm work in the past year than crop workers outside California. U.S.-born workers earned more than foreign-born workers, but the premium for U.S.-born workers was almost $2 an hour in California and less than $1 an hour in the rest of the United States. A full-time worker employed 5 days a week for 50 weeks has 250 days of work; the average crop worker had almost 200 days of farm work in the year before being interviewed.
California sucks ........their people live in tents....high poverty........and number one with using illegal workers.
Their agriculture uses illegals for their large crops.......paying if your lucky $2 an hour.
I don't know anyone making fifty k a year, living in any tent.People making 50k a year are living in tents...........That's not the problem.Higher paid labor, pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. And, recent studies on quality of life put California at the bottom due to cost of living issues. A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage merely adjusts that ratio, to help improve our standing in that study.ArchiveThe point is that Employers should be covering the cost of wages, simply because they get tax breaks for it.How is my post "in a vacuum"?
If Social Services are $14.00 per hour, something you've never supported with a reliable source and link. What would it go to if all wages increased 100%?
.walter e. williams:
- While legislative bodies have the power to order wage increases, they have not as of yet found a way to order commensurate increases in worker productivity that make the worker’s output worth the higher wage.
- Further, while Congress can legislate the wage at which labor transactions occur, it cannot require that the transaction actually be made, and the worker hired.
Anything less than fourteen dollars an hour is being subsidized by the public. Why do Employers who are in it for a Profit, get subsidized with "cheap labor"?
Implications for California
About 98% of the crop workers on California farms, and 58% of crop workers on farms outside California, were born abroad. Table 1 shows that the share of foreign-born crop workers who are unauthorized, 68%, is similar in California and the rest of the United States; however, since 98% of California's crop workers are foreign-born, California has a higher-than-average share of unauthorized workers than most other states.
California crop workers had lower average hourly earnings and fewer days of farm work in the past year than crop workers outside California. U.S.-born workers earned more than foreign-born workers, but the premium for U.S.-born workers was almost $2 an hour in California and less than $1 an hour in the rest of the United States. A full-time worker employed 5 days a week for 50 weeks has 250 days of work; the average crop worker had almost 200 days of farm work in the year before being interviewed.
They know the right wing doesn't care.
California sucks ........their people live in tents....high poverty........and number one with using illegal workers.
Their agriculture uses illegals for their large crops.......paying if your lucky $2 an hour.
And.....they vote Democrat.....for free!
Who is gonna pay for that? Doyathink?
Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.
