Actually, no. The Hitching Post explicitly states that they can and will perform non-religious ceremonies in purely secular services.
They're not a church, they're officially open for everyone regardless of religion.
They are still ordained ministers and cannot be compelled to act against their morals.
So if they claim as 'ordained ministers' that their moral beliefs state that they cannot pay income taxes- they can't be compelled to pay income taxes?
Taxes and forcing some to perform a wedding by government fiat are two different things.
The claim was made:
They are still ordained ministers and cannot be compelled to act against their morals.
My question stands- can they be compelled to pay income taxes if they claim it would be against their morals?
The issue is exactly the same. Can anyone who claims to be a religious professional be forced by government to do anything that he or she claims is against his or her religious teachings?
For instance- can the government force a Seventh Day Adventist minister to allow blood transfusions to their children?
Tax paying is a required part of society, the burden placed on not being able to religiously pay taxes has to be extremely high, and considering most religions are 100% OK with it, this is a strawman and a non-issue.
The children/blood transfusion issue is more about the power of the government to be a guardian over parents of a minor, again, not relevant.
What we have here is government force on ordained ministers, in a non essential, easy to get elsewhere service.
As an edit, its Jehovah's Witnesses that refuse blood transfusions, not Seventh Day Adventists.