Hillary's Enthusiasm Gap

william the wie

Gold Member
Nov 18, 2009
16,667
2,405
280
I have seen no Hillary bumper stickers or road signs or positive ads for her. Does anyone see her as a change for the better?
 
Her favorability differential is still better than Comrade Donald's but is dropping.
 
Her favorability differential is still better than Comrade Donald's but is dropping.


Hitlery can't draw flies for an audience...no "Hitlery" bumper stickers here in Florida. She is the most uninspiring candidate the leftard clown posse has offered up since Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis........
 
Instead of really vetting the field of potential candidates in the Dem party, they decided to run their corrupt puppet who would keep the money and power machine running.

It was more important to them to run Hillary than finding the candidate that was best for the country.

Had they run anyone with any integrity, Trump would be down 20 points.
 
Instead of really vetting the field of potential candidates in the Dem party, they decided to run their corrupt puppet who would keep the money and power machine running.

It was more important to them to run Hillary than finding the candidate that was best for the country.

Had they run anyone with any integrity, Trump would be down 20 points.
Had they run Webb, Trump would have quit months ago
 
Webb is establishment. Informed American taxpayers are sick of establishment Presidents.

A couple of idiots in CT still have a Crazy Bernie bumper sticker. There would be more Tump bumper stickers, but folks probably don't want their car vandalized by low information democrats when they park it.
 
I'd post a Trump sign on the front yard but we recently had the house painted and Hillary supporters are just plain nutty..
 
One has to remember that there is a history here.

8 years of FDR/Truman lead to Eisenhower
8 years of IKE lead to 8 years of Kennedy/Johnson
8 years of Nixon/Ford lead to 4 years of Carter
4 years of Carter lead to 12 years of Reagan BushI
Then we had
8 years of Clinton
8 years of Bush II

Hillary isn't supposed to win. Americans have a very long history of switching parties after two terms with only one instance of differentiation in the last 65 years; and before that we had 3 terms of FDR during the largest conflict in World history; a rather extraordinary event.

Yet she is ahead of most nationwide polls (which are meaningless) and has a virtual lock in the electoral college.
 
This is a really strange election. I agree GM. Any kind of half decent D candidate would slice dice and julianne Trump as an amateur.
 
One has to remember that there is a history here.

8 years of FDR/Truman lead to Eisenhower
8 years of IKE lead to 8 years of Kennedy/Johnson
8 years of Nixon/Ford lead to 4 years of Carter
4 years of Carter lead to 12 years of Reagan BushI
Then we had
8 years of Clinton
8 years of Bush II

Hillary isn't supposed to win. Americans have a very long history of switching parties after two terms with only one instance of differentiation in the last 65 years; and before that we had 3 terms of FDR during the largest conflict in World history; a rather extraordinary event.

Yet she is ahead of most nationwide polls (which are meaningless) and has a virtual lock in the electoral college.

Good job, little sheeple......I will give you partial credit but you are too stupid to figure out why that is.....
 
Nov 1st for sure hillary's gone because of ACA death spiral but I suspect she will replaced by the DNC before then. The electoral college is slowly moving against her but depending on her health and wikileaks may make this election unwinnable by any D. The R lock on the senate is now solid and there could even be a slight gain.
 
One has to remember that there is a history here.

8 years of FDR/Truman lead to Eisenhower
8 years of IKE lead to 8 years of Kennedy/Johnson
8 years of Nixon/Ford lead to 4 years of Carter
4 years of Carter lead to 12 years of Reagan BushI
Then we had
8 years of Clinton
8 years of Bush II

Hillary isn't supposed to win. Americans have a very long history of switching parties after two terms with only one instance of differentiation in the last 65 years; and before that we had 3 terms of FDR during the largest conflict in World history; a rather extraordinary event.

Yet she is ahead of most nationwide polls (which are meaningless) and has a virtual lock in the electoral college.
Could it be 16 years of bulding up a welfare nation?
 
One has to remember that there is a history here.

8 years of FDR/Truman lead to Eisenhower
8 years of IKE lead to 8 years of Kennedy/Johnson
8 years of Nixon/Ford lead to 4 years of Carter
4 years of Carter lead to 12 years of Reagan BushI
Then we had
8 years of Clinton
8 years of Bush II

Hillary isn't supposed to win. Americans have a very long history of switching parties after two terms with only one instance of differentiation in the last 65 years; and before that we had 3 terms of FDR during the largest conflict in World history; a rather extraordinary event.

Yet she is ahead of most nationwide polls (which are meaningless) and has a virtual lock in the electoral college.
Could it be 16 years of bulding up a welfare nation?

No. Most of the voters realize that they are warmed by fires that were started by others and that the "I was never given anything" is pure garbage.

HRC is doing something very unusual by contending and winning this far into the election cycle after 8 years of her party having the White House.
 

Forum List

Back
Top