Hillary violated federal election law

TroglocratsRdumb

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2017
Messages
46,000
Reaction score
68,172
Points
3,615

Story by Randy DeSoto
The Washington D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign and an affiliated super PAC violated federal election law in spending that totaled close to $6 million.

The amount in question is more than 45 times the $130,000 a Manhattan court convicted former President Donald Trump of misreporting in business records during the same 2016 campaign.

In a separate matter, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee agreed in 2022 to pay $113,000 to settle an FEC investigation into alleged violations of campaign finance law in relation to funding the infamous Steele dossier during the 2016 race, according to the Associated Press.

Comment:
Wow it took 7 years for the wheels of justice to turn.
Hillary doesn't care.
The crazy Left Wingers don't care.
 
Trump had the opportunity to have investigated all of this and upheld a campaign pledge to charge her.

He would have easily had the goods. He was too busy calling people names on Twitter.
 
democrats hate that soulless shit beast too.... but they're scared of it (rightfully so!)...


hillury just kill them hush money.webp
 

Story by Randy DeSoto
The Washington D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign and an affiliated super PAC violated federal election law in spending that totaled close to $6 million.

The amount in question is more than 45 times the $130,000 a Manhattan court convicted former President Donald Trump of misreporting in business records during the same 2016 campaign.

In a separate matter, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee agreed in 2022 to pay $113,000 to settle an FEC investigation into alleged violations of campaign finance law in relation to funding the infamous Steele dossier during the 2016 race, according to the Associated Press.

Comment:
Wow it took 7 years for the wheels of justice to turn.
Hillary doesn't care.
The crazy Left Wingers don't care.
Democrat.

Protected.

Nothing will happen.

Carry on.
 
Trump had the opportunity to have investigated all of this and upheld a campaign pledge to charge her.

He would have easily had the goods. He was too busy calling people names on Twitter.
And if he wins and DOES go after those who BROKE THE LAW in coming after his candidacy, you and those like you will be pissing your pants in outrage. Hypocrites, the lot of ya...
 

Story by Randy DeSoto
The Washington D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign and an affiliated super PAC violated federal election law in spending that totaled close to $6 million.

The amount in question is more than 45 times the $130,000 a Manhattan court convicted former President Donald Trump of misreporting in business records during the same 2016 campaign.

In a separate matter, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee agreed in 2022 to pay $113,000 to settle an FEC investigation into alleged violations of campaign finance law in relation to funding the infamous Steele dossier during the 2016 race, according to the Associated Press.

Comment:
Wow it took 7 years for the wheels of justice to turn.
Hillary doesn't care.
The crazy Left Wingers don't care.

Imagine what the state of China would be today if she had won relative to Americas place in the world.

The voters definitely got it right in 2016.
 
Trump had the opportunity to have investigated all of this and upheld a campaign pledge to charge her.

He would have easily had the goods. He was too busy calling people names on Twitter.
No. He used to hit that. He liked dat ass too much.
 
And if he wins and DOES go after those who BROKE THE LAW in coming after his candidacy, you and those like you will be pissing your pants in outrage. Hypocrites, the lot of ya...

I had hoped he would prosecute Hillary. I've said so. I believe Biden is every bit as guilty with the classified information as is Trump and I've said so. I said if you prosecute one, you have to prosecute both (and anyone else who has done the same).
 

Story by Randy DeSoto
The Washington D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign and an affiliated super PAC violated federal election law in spending that totaled close to $6 million.

The amount in question is more than 45 times the $130,000 a Manhattan court convicted former President Donald Trump of misreporting in business records during the same 2016 campaign.

In a separate matter, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee agreed in 2022 to pay $113,000 to settle an FEC investigation into alleged violations of campaign finance law in relation to funding the infamous Steele dossier during the 2016 race, according to the Associated Press.

Comment:
Wow it took 7 years for the wheels of justice to turn.
Hillary doesn't care.
The crazy Left Wingers don't care.
I'm sure the DOJ will be knocking on her door any minute now, probably begging her to enter the 2024 race.
 
Trump had the opportunity to have investigated all of this and upheld a campaign pledge to charge her.

He would have easily had the goods. He was too busy calling people names on Twitter.
Do you mean that he had the opportunity to engage in lawfare against his political opponents but didn't do it?
 
Do you mean that he had the opportunity to engage in lawfare against his political opponents but didn't do it?

If someone broke the law it's simply enforcing the law.
 
Trump had the opportunity to have investigated all of this and upheld a campaign pledge to charge her.
It was investigated.

The FEC had dismissed the complaint against the Clinton campaign and Correct the Record, citing an internet exemption had allowed them not to list the coordination between the two, but the D.C. Circuit Court found that decision was in error.
"We hold that the Commission acted contrary to law in dismissing the complaint. Because we conclude that the internet exemption cannot be read to exempt from disclosure those expenditures that are only tangentially related to an eventual internet message or post, the Commission’s reading of the internet exemption stretches it beyond lawful limits," the ruling read.
____________________
In a separate matter, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee agreed in 2022 to pay $113,000 to settle an FEC investigation into alleged violations of campaign finance law in relation to funding the infamous Steele dossier during the 2016 race, according to the Associated Press.


"The Clinton campaign hired Perkins Coie, which then hired Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Republican candidate Donald Trump’s ties to Russia. But on FEC forms, the Clinton campaign classified the spending as legal services," the AP said.

That's interesting, because that's exactly the violation Bragg said the Trump Organization committed in relation to paying Cohen.

The initial complaint, according to the AP, charged that “y intentionally obscuring their payments through Perkins Coie and failing to publicly disclose the true purpose of those payments,” the campaign and DNC “were able to avoid publicly reporting on their statutorily required FEC disclosure forms the fact that they were paying Fusion GPS to perform opposition research on Trump with the intent of influencing the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.”

"The Clinton campaign and DNC had argued that the payments had been described accurately, but agreed, according to the documents, to settle without conceding to avoid further legal costs," the news outlet noted.


Trump made the same point in relation to the payment for Cohen, but on stronger grounds. Cohen was his personal attorney at the time and in addition to paying the lawyer's fees, the money had gone to reimburse him for funds paid to Daniels as part of a non-disclosure agreement, i.e., a contract.

How else was the Trump Organization accountant supposed to list the payment?


So Clinton and the DNC pay an FEC administrative fine and the matter is done with, but Trump has to go through a six-week criminal trial and faces potential jail time.


And Democrats wonder why they're accused of overseeing a two-tiered system of justice.
 
15th post
It was investigated.

The FEC had dismissed the complaint against the Clinton campaign and Correct the Record, citing an internet exemption had allowed them not to list the coordination between the two, but the D.C. Circuit Court found that decision was in error.
"We hold that the Commission acted contrary to law in dismissing the complaint. Because we conclude that the internet exemption cannot be read to exempt from disclosure those expenditures that are only tangentially related to an eventual internet message or post, the Commission’s reading of the internet exemption stretches it beyond lawful limits," the ruling read.
____________________
In a separate matter, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee agreed in 2022 to pay $113,000 to settle an FEC investigation into alleged violations of campaign finance law in relation to funding the infamous Steele dossier during the 2016 race, according to the Associated Press.


"The Clinton campaign hired Perkins Coie, which then hired Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Republican candidate Donald Trump’s ties to Russia. But on FEC forms, the Clinton campaign classified the spending as legal services," the AP said.

That's interesting, because that's exactly the violation Bragg said the Trump Organization committed in relation to paying Cohen.

The initial complaint, according to the AP, charged that “y intentionally obscuring their payments through Perkins Coie and failing to publicly disclose the true purpose of those payments,” the campaign and DNC “were able to avoid publicly reporting on their statutorily required FEC disclosure forms the fact that they were paying Fusion GPS to perform opposition research on Trump with the intent of influencing the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.”

"The Clinton campaign and DNC had argued that the payments had been described accurately, but agreed, according to the documents, to settle without conceding to avoid further legal costs," the news outlet noted.


Trump made the same point in relation to the payment for Cohen, but on stronger grounds. Cohen was his personal attorney at the time and in addition to paying the lawyer's fees, the money had gone to reimburse him for funds paid to Daniels as part of a non-disclosure agreement, i.e., a contract.

How else was the Trump Organization accountant supposed to list the payment?


So Clinton and the DNC pay an FEC administrative fine and the matter is done with, but Trump has to go through a six-week criminal trial and faces potential jail time.


And Democrats wonder why they're accused of overseeing a two-tiered system of justice.

Trump left it to the Biden administration to rule on.

Stupid.
 
Trump left it to the Biden administration to rule on.
2018 under Trump


In a separate matter, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee agreed in 2022 to pay $113,000 to settle an FEC investigation into alleged violations of campaign finance law in relation to funding the infamous Steele dossier during the 2016 race, according to the Associated Press.
 
Back
Top Bottom