Hillary Clinton releases nutty "stolen election" conspiracy video

This lunatic is a very likely 2024 Democrat presidential candidate.

This is hard to watch, but it's good to know what level of crazy we're dealing with...


Wow, in two minutes time, she attacked the electoral college which has been in place since the earliest years of the republic. She attacked the SCOTUS as being politically biased and not governed by the constitution and even managed to attack states rights. Is there no low that this shrill, commie bitch won't stoop to in her efforts to dismantle this country? I should donate a box of bullshit to her campaign. The way they throw it around, they must be getting low.
 
That's just going back to the Constitution.

No where in the Constitution, does it mention, giving the common folks of this nation, "a vote." No where.

Section 1

"The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.

He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.

The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.. . . "


1666715790957.png



". . . .All of these variations are allowable under the constitutional design. As the Supreme Court wrote in McPherson v. Blacker (1892), which rejected a constitutional challenge to a Michigan law providing for selection of Electors by a district system, “the appointment and mode of appointment of Electors belong exclusively to the states under the constitution of the United States.” We have no uniform national system for appointing Electors, which means the legislatures do not have to consult the public at all. When members of the Florida legislature in 2000 threatened to abandon the results of the statewide popular contest and appoint Electors for a particular candidate, the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore (2000) appeared to endorse their power to do so by denying that citizens have a constitutional right to vote in presidential elections. As the majority put it, “The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for Electors for the President of the United States. . .” When it comes to presidential elections, the voters are at the mercy of the state legislatures.. . . "

IOW? Hillary is gas-lighting her peeps. Individual voters have, in the end, no rights over the federal election to president, only over their state and senate congressional representative and senators, and THEY will be the ones that determine your national, federal, political destiny.

6y8jrs.jpg
 
Hillary has always been over the edge. She has never met a fundraising that she was not for especially if it benefits her pocketbook
Like when she was the Secretary of State and Gaddafi was killed, with his 150 tons of gold worth $7 billion dollars disappeared? Let’s never forget why Muammar Gaddafi was killed | Pambazuka News

Oh, that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Earlier that same year, Obummer bragged about getting Osama bin Laden, who left $29 million to his family in his will. Nobody remembers nothing about his children inheriting anything. Coincidence? Oh, and the press said nothing about the Geneva Convention's declaring killing off past enemies who are no longer a threat is unacceptable. Our press said absolutely nothing but salamis to Barack Obama, who somehow is rich beyond imagination after his tour of duty as president for 8 years was over. Yeah, coincidences appear where you don't expect them.
 
Last edited:
Election denier!

Hillary Clinton is a threat to democracy!
What democracy is it when the least trusted extortionist in the world has thousands of mules willing to haul in more votes in convenience boxes that contain 100% of votes to the loser and gets the press to rubberstamp, ignore reality, deny the truth, and perpetrate communist propaganda that will yoke today's children into tomorrow's winless gulag? *yawn* Communism bores me already. We have evidence, and the courts don't want to look at it because they're no longer safe in their homes since someone disclosed their addresses to the abortion apparatchiks. The communists have no use for phrases like "land of the free and home of the brave," so they're cancelling democracy in favor of being able to have wanton amount of power in which slaves pay them to be alive. hey, it works in Russia and China and several other mineral-rich countries. *yawn*
 
Last edited:
What democracy is it when the least trusted extortionist in the world has thousands of mules willing to haul in more votes in convenience boxes that contain 100% of votes to the loser and gets the press to rubberstamp, ignore reality, deny the truth, and perpetrate communist propaganda that will yoke today's children into tomorrow's winless gulag? *yawn* Communism bores me already. We have evidence, and the courts don't want to look at it because they're no longer safe in their homes since someone disclosed their addresses to the abortion apparatchiks. The communists have no use for phrases like "land of the free and home of the brave," so they're cancelling democracy in favor of being able to have wanton amount of power in which slaves pay them to be alive. hey, it works in Russia and China and several other mineral-rich countries. *yawn*
1666872355179.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top