Thank you for another opportunity to point out that Hillary Clinton stood with Martin Luther King Jr., and Corretta Scott King in her admiration for Margaret Sanger
Martin Luther King Jr. and Margaret Sanger
Family Planning - A Special and Urgent Concern :: Gulf Coast
(upon receiving the Margaret Sanger Award)
Before reading Dr. King's speech, Mrs. King declared, "I am proud tonight to say a word in behalf of your mentor, and the person who symbolizes the ideas of this organization, Margaret Sanger. Because of her dedication, her deep convictions, and for her suffering for what she believed in, I would like to say that I am proud to be a woman tonight."
MLK Jr.'s speech
There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.
Recently the subject of Negro family life has received extensive attention. Unfortunately, studies have overemphasized the problem of the Negro male ego and almost entirely ignored the most serious element - Negro migration. During the past half century Negroes have migrated on a massive scale, transplanting millions from rural communities to crammed urban ghettoes. In their migration, as with all migrants, they carried with them the folkways of the countryside into an inhospitable city slum. The size of family that may have been appropriate and tolerable on a manually cultivated farm was carried over to the jammed streets of the ghetto. In all respects Negroes were atomized, neglected and discriminated against. Yet, the worst omission was the absence of institutions to acclimate them to their new environment. Margaret Sanger, who offered an important institutional remedy, was unfortunately ignored by social and political leaders in this period. In consequence, Negro folkways in family size persisted. The problem was compounded when unrestrained exploitation and discrimination accented the bewilderment of the newcomer, and high rates of illegitimacy and fragile family relationships resulted.
For the Negro, therefore, intelligent guides of family planning are a profoundly important ingredient in his quest for security and a decent life. There are mountainous obstacles still separating Negroes from a normal existence. Yet one element in stabilizing his life would be an understanding of and easy access to the means to develop a family related in size to his community environment and to the income potential he can command.
This is not to suggest that the Negro will solve all his problems through Planned Parenthood. His problems are far more complex, encompassing economic security, education, freedom from discrimination, decent housing and access to culture. Yet if family planning is sensible it can facilitate or at least not be an obstacle to the solution of the many profound problems that plague him.
The Negro constitutes half the poor of the nation. Like all poor, Negro and white, they have many unwanted children. This is a cruel evil they urgently need to control. There is scarcely anything more tragic in human life than a child who is not wanted. That which should be a blessing becomes a curse for parent and child. There is nothing inherent in the Negro mentality which creates this condition. Their poverty causes it. When Negroes have been able to ascend economically, statistics reveal they plan their families with even greater care than whites. Negroes of higher economic and educational status actually have fewer children than white families in the same circumstances.
i was looking for
eugenics and
deplorable in your treatment. people will have to decide at the voting booth.
?
Thank you for another opportunity to point out that Hillary Clinton stood with Martin Luther King Jr., and Corretta Scott King in her admiration for Margaret Sanger
so what, it's horrifying. not just sanger... the supremes went along. still horrifying. cultish in fact. you'll learn.
Buck v. Bell - Wikipedia
Buck v. Bell - Wikipedia
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by ..... Cohen, Adam (2016), Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck, Penguin, ISBN 978-1-59420-418-0 ...
Background ·
The case ·
The effect of the ruling ·
In popular culture
The Supreme Court Ruling That Led To 70000 Forced ... - NPR
www.npr.org/.../03/.../the-supreme-court-ruling-that-led-to-70-000-forced-sterilizations
Mar 7, 2016 - The Supreme Court Ruling That Led To 70,000 Forced Sterilizations ... The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie ...
The Supreme Court Ruling That Led To 70000 Forced ... - NPR
www.npr.org/2017/.../the-supreme-court-ruling-that-led-to-70-000-forced-sterilizations
4 days ago - Adam Cohen's book titled "Imbeciles" is about the eugenics movement in the early 20th century and the Supreme Court case legalizing ...
Buck vs. Bell Trial - EugenicsArchive
www.eugenicsarchive.org/html/eugenics/static/themes/39.html
In the Buck vs. Bell decision of May 2, 1927, the United States Supreme Court upheld a Virginia statute that provided for the eugenic sterilization for people ...
Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and ...
https://www.amazon.com/Three-Genera...nics/.../0801898242&tag=ff0d01-20?tag=usmb-20
"Three generations of imbeciles are enough." Few lines from Supreme Court opinions are as memorable as this declaration by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
Eugenics in Virginia: Buck v. Bell and Forced Sterilization | Eugenics ...
exhibits.hsl.virginia.edu/eugenics/
Eugenics in Virginia: Buck v. Bell and Forced Sterilization. Photograph of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. Courtesy of the Library of Congress.
Buck v. Bell: The Test Case for Virginia's Eugenical Sterilization Act ...
exhibits.hsl.virginia.edu/eugenics/3-buckvbell/
It is done in the standard Eugenics Record Office format used to demonstrate the .... Bell: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Virginia's Eugenical Sterilization Law.
What the Supreme Court's Infamous 1927 Eugenics Decision Tells Us ...
www.huffingtonpost.com/the-national.../essay-what-the-supreme-co_b_9355860.html
Mar 1, 2016 - In 1927, in Buck v. Bell, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that a poor white woman from Virginia should be sterilized for eugenic reasons.
Buck v. Bell: Inside the SCOTUS Case That Led to Forced Sterilization ...
Buck v. Bell: Inside the SCOTUS Case That Led to Forced Sterilization of 70,000 & Inspired the Nazis | Democracy Now!
Mar 17, 2016 - author of Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. He was previously a member of The New ...
Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and ...
Three Generations, No Imbeciles
Powered by Google™. Three Generations, No Imbeciles. Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Paul A. Lombardo. Winner, 2009 Georgia Author of the ...