Zone1 Here's Why White Guilt About Slavery Is Insane

[Lockback]

Bullshit

Those details were irrelevant to the case you stupid fool

You have consistently lied about this case. You wanted him covicted because of POLTIICS not because of truth

He did not commit murder and that is proven fact

He's so unhinged about this case, I can only wonder what he was like as it was going on and when the verdicts were read. I'd pay money to see his reaction to that.

 

[Robert W]

don't have to make it up.

If Rittenhouse was so innocent, the judge shouldn't have suppressed the information about beating up the 14 year old, saying how he wanted to shoot a black man, and his hanging out with the Proud Boys wearing a "Free as F***" T-Shirt.

All Rittenhouse proved is that with enough money and sleazy lawyers, you can literally get away with murder. But we already knew that with OJ Simpson.

Yes, you don't have to make it up, but you keep doing it. Rittenhouse was on trial for the purpose of arriving at the truth and the Jury found the truth. Rittenhouse never has shot a black man.

 

[JoeB131]

Yes, you don't have to make it up, but you keep doing it. Rittenhouse was on trial for the purpose of arriving at the truth and the Jury found the truth. Rittenhouse never has shot a black man.

No, they didn't "find the truth".

The truth was hidden from them by Judge Senile.

 

[Robert W]

No, they didn't "find the truth".

The truth was hidden from them by Judge Senile.

The Judge was not the prosecution. Look, you are a very, very loyal democrat, and I departed them for partly the reason you are one of them.

 

[JoeB131]

The Judge was not the prosecution. Look, you are a very, very loyal democrat, and I departed them for partly the reason you are one of them.

It's nothing about Democrat vs. Republican.

I don't think Republicans really want maniacs shooting their way through crowds.

The ironic thing is that if Grosskuertz had shot Rittenhouse dead, the NRA would have been praising him as a "Good Guy with a Gun".

 

[Robert W]

It's nothing about Democrat vs. Republican.

I don't think Republicans really want maniacs shooting their way through crowds.

The ironic thing is that if Grosskuertz had shot Rittenhouse dead, the NRA would have been praising him as a "Good Guy with a Gun".

So, you were a loyal Republican you claim. Now you are strictly a loyal Democrat. Yet you make claims about the court that dealt with Rittenhouse and call them out. As to your speculation, no thanks.

 

[Hollie]

I agree. We saw it all on tape. We saw this lunatic shoot an unarmed homeless man half his size, and then shoot his way out of a crowd of bystanders who were trying to hold him for the police.

Would that be the “peacefully protesting bystanders, of the child molesting kind, who physically attacked him brandishing a handgun.

 

[Hollie]

It's nothing about Democrat vs. Republican.

I don't think Republicans really want maniacs shooting their way through crowds.

The ironic thing is that if Grosskuertz had shot Rittenhouse dead, the NRA would have been praising him as a "Good Guy with a Gun".

Nonsense, Chatbot. Your hero Grosskuertz was the aggressor.

Otherwise, it seems democrats are fine with their mentally disturbed, drug addled trannies shooting their way through crowds.

 

[Robert W]

I agree. We saw it all on tape. We saw this lunatic shoot an unarmed homeless man half his size, and then shoot his way out of a crowd of bystanders who were trying to hold him for the police.

Homeless is off the topic. The court never found Rittenhouse was a lunatic, so that is off topic. Justice was indeed done for Kyle Rittenhouse. You don't mind victims being murdered. Want to tell them you object to Ashli Babbit being murdered by an armed cop who stalked her?

 

[Robert W]

Joe is both anti-semitic and anti-white (like so many leftists) and will AUTOMATICALLY side with a black or a white rioting for a “black cause.”

I am sure he has no problem with the black cop who killed the unarmed, white Army veteran on 1/6.

He clearly is anti-republican and was pleased when Ashli Babbitt was murdered by the cop that stalked her.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No, they didn't "find the truth".

The truth was hidden from them by Judge Senile.

Yes they did and nothing was hidden the judge acted correctly

 

[Soupnazi630]

It's nothing about Democrat vs. Republican.

I don't think Republicans really want maniacs shooting their way through crowds.

The ironic thing is that if Grosskuertz had shot Rittenhouse dead, the NRA would have been praising him as a "Good Guy with a Gun".

Bullshit and no one shot their way through a crowd

 

[JoeB131]

So, you were a loyal Republican you claim. Now you are strictly a loyal Democrat. Yet you make claims about the court that dealt with Rittenhouse and call them out. As to your speculation, no thanks.

Making the point that the court (and it was a Democrat judge) did quite a lot to help Rittenhouse's case, from suppressing evidence to attacking the prosecutors.

But the real problem here was that all the Gun Fetishists who sent Rittenhouse money let him buy very expensive lawyers, and we know in America, you can literally get away with murder if you can afford good lawyers.

 

[Hollie]

Making the point that the court (and it was a Democrat judge) did quite a lot to help Rittenhouse's case, from suppressing evidence to attacking the prosecutors.

But the real problem here was that all the Gun Fetishists who sent Rittenhouse money let him buy very expensive lawyers, and we know in America, you can literally get away with murder if you can afford good lawyers.

Oh dear, Chatbot. Your conspiracy theory about the judge “suppressing evidence to attacking the prosecutors” is a failed attempt to justify your hurt feelings.

 

[Hafar1014]

Making the point that the court (and it was a Democrat judge) did quite a lot to help Rittenhouse's case, from suppressing evidence to attacking the prosecutors.

But the real problem here was that all the Gun Fetishists who sent Rittenhouse money let him buy very expensive lawyers, and we know in America, you can literally get away with murder if you can afford good lawyers.

He had 100% solid case for self defense and the jury agreed.

 

[JoeB131]

He had 100% solid case for self defense and the jury agreed.

Shooting three people, two of whom were trying to hold him for police, is not self-defense.

 

[DennisPTate]

Modern woke pseudo-history paints a fabricated story of slavery; that white men came to Africa, stole Africans from their lands, and brought them to America. It was White American men, and only White American men, who were guilty of this, and it was a large majority of them as well. This was unique to the world at the time and in world history, and is a special evil in the history of mankind.

Of course, this is all complete nonsense, and is just woke propaganda we were taught in schools or are being told by politicians or media pundits today. But it's important to look at the context and just how insanely wrong these claims are. Let's look at total number of slaves, for example:

It is absolutely true that the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, in which Africans captured other Africans and sold them, shipped approximately 12.5 million slaves across the Atlantic to the Americas.

The Issue becomes where those slaves were taken. A woke liberal would probably assume that 12.5 million slaves were taken from Africa and sent to the American south. That would be insanely false. The breakdown looks like this:

• 5.4 million were sent to Brazil
• 3.6 million were sent to the Carribean
• 1.2 million were sent to Jamaica
• 900,000 were sent to St. Dominique (French Colony)
• 889,000 were sent to Cuba
• 470,000 were sent to the United States

So in this cry of woke left Democrat social justice warriors... cries of the unique evil of America, white men, etc... they make the claims they do when American only partook in 3% of the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade.

Add to that how there were only about 390,000 slave owners in the USA out of a population of 31 million... and you have approximately 1.2% of the population participating or benefitting from it, yet is that what Democrats, leftists, or educators say, address, or teach?

Slavery is an evil that has existed as long as human history has. All races have been enslaved, many continue to be. As far as America is concerned, it basically happened for 90 years nearly 200 years ago. However, no woke Democrat can legitimately point the finger at the USA as some unique evil in slavery, nor can they say we were any leader in it. They need to point the finger at Africans of the times first, and then all the South American/Brazilian/Carribean nations who were far greater participants.

And this is just the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. Again, Slavery exists across the world at far greater rates throughout history.

So, any person who wants to demonize the USA and White people as a unique evil as far as slavery, or as a major historical cause of it, is just revealing their tragic indoctrination and ignorance of history.

For the record I do totally agree with you that White Guilt over Slavery is terribly misunderstood but I believe that evidence from the "Paranormal" and from "ParaPsychology" can alter how we look at our lives, [and especially how our lives now do fit with this controversial topic] .

Would you like for me to go into information related to the beliefs of the Messianic Jewish community of the first, second, third and fourth century and how Roman Catholic beliefs came to include "Purgatory?"

I cannot do this without taking a serious look at the verses in the Christian and Jewish scriptures that seem to fit amazingly well with the Dr. Ian Stevenson research.

Dr. Ian Stevenson's Reincarnation Research - Near-Death Experiences and the Afterlife

Near-Death Experiences and the Afterlife profiles Dr. Ian Stevenson's Reincarnation Research . Did you enjoy reading this post, we have more!

near-death.com

Amen I say to you, there hath not risen among them that are born of women a greater than John the Baptist: yet he that is the lesser in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he. 12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent bear it away. 13 For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John: 14 And if you will receive it, he is Elias that is to come. 15 He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Douay-Rheims Bible, Matthew Chapter 11

Catholic Bible Study Online, Douay-Rheims Version. Complete text, index, search, Bible verse, bible story, scripture, book, prophesy, christian ...

www.drbo.org

For years, actually decades,... I assumed that the Disciples were asking another Stupid Question..... but now I am not so sure????

And Jesus passing by, saw a man, who was blind from his birth: 2 And his disciples asked him: Rabbi, who hath sinned, this man, or his parents, that he should be born blind?

Douay-Rheims Bible, John Chapter 9

Catholic Bible Study Online, Douay-Rheims Version. Complete text, index, search, Bible verse, bible story, scripture, book, prophesy, christian ...

www.drbo.org

 

[Soupnazi630]

Making the point that the court (and it was a Democrat judge) did quite a lot to help Rittenhouse's case, from suppressing evidence to attacking the prosecutors.

But the real problem here was that all the Gun Fetishists who sent Rittenhouse money let him buy very expensive lawyers, and we know in America, you can literally get away with murder if you can afford good lawyers.

Wrong

There was no supprerssed evidence

 

[Hollie]

Shooting three people, two of whom were trying to hold him for police, is not self-defense.

Such is the illusion of a message board lawyer.

 

[JoeB131]

Wrong

There was no supprerssed evidence

Then why did the judge exclude the video of Rittenhouse fantasizing about shooting a black man leaving a CVS?