Zone1 Here's Why White Guilt About Slavery Is Insane

[jc456]

Nope. racism requires insitutional power.

prove it. define racism. again, there's no such thing. It's a lap dog word created by democrats. Everything is racism. Everything. We are the human RACE.

 

[jc456]

Because he wasn't born in Kenya.

He was born in Hawaii, according to official records.

And he never claimed otherwise when applying to Harvard.

still going with that huh?

 

[Mr. Friscus]

A black person can hate me all day, but he really can't do all that much to ruin the quality of my life. That's the point.

There’s many ways they could actually. A bullet could, for starters. Nothing institutional about that, and it’s completely race-neutral

 

[jc456]

There’s many ways they could actually. A bullet could, for starters. Nothing institutional about that, and it’s completely race-neutral

And there are many ways they could impact white lives. Their access to weapons and threatening positions is available to them to use. there's no directional weapon or threat I am aware of.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Nope. racism requires insitutional power.

A black person can hate me all day, but he really can't do all that much to ruin the quality of my life. That's the point.

So a black can walk up, call you a cracker, knife you without provocation and he isn't racist. Riiiight, pull the other leg, it's got bells on it

 

[jc456]

So a black can walk up, call you a cracker, knife you without provocation and he isn't racist. Riiiight, pull the other leg, it's got bells on it

he believes everyone is complicit to the commands.

 

[Lisa558]

So a black can walk up, call you a cracker, knife you without provocation and he isn't racist. Riiiight, pull the other leg, it's got bells on it

Or a black can say that Jews are “evil,” “satanic,” and “doing Satan’s work,” as one of the black racists on this forum did, and he isn’t antisemitic.

 

[JoeB131]

There’s many ways they could actually. A bullet could, for starters. Nothing institutional about that, and it’s completely race-neutral

Well, funny thing, if a black man shot me, he'd go to jail.

As opposed to Zimmerman and Rittenhouse, who can shoot people and not go to jail.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Well, funny thing, if a black man shot me, he'd go to jail.

As opposed to Zimmerman and Rittenhouse, who can shoot people and not go to jail.

Wrong. Both cases were clear self-defense.

 

[DukeU]

Well, funny thing, if a black man shot me, he'd go to jail.

As opposed to Zimmerman and Rittenhouse, who can shoot people and not go to jail.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Well, funny thing, if a black man shot me, he'd go to jail.

Agreed. You said they couldn't do anything to do. Well, they can.

As opposed to Zimmerman and Rittenhouse, who can shoot people and not go to jail.

Red herring.

 

[JoeB131]

Agreed. You said they couldn't do anything to do. Well, they can.

Red herring.

I think you fail to understand the implication of institutional power. Crime isn't an institutional power. It's a crime and we spend lots of money prosecuting people for breaking it.

My point about Rittenhouse and Zimmerman is that they shot blacks or black allies, but because of white privilege and a shitload of money, they were able to con stupid juries into thinking that gunning down unarmed people half your size is "Self-defense".

 

[Soupnazi630]

I think you fail to understand the implication of institutional power. Crime isn't an institutional power. It's a crime and we spend lots of money prosecuting people for breaking it.

My point about Rittenhouse and Zimmerman is that they shot blacks or black allies, but because of white privilege and a shitload of money, they were able to con stupid juries into thinking that gunning down unarmed people half your size is "Self-defense".

No one half the size of the shooter wwas gunned fown by other of those to moron

You ALWAYS have to dream up chlldish lies proving that your point is ignorant and wrong

The facts prove them innocent and you wrong

 

[Soupnazi630]

Well, funny thing, if a black man shot me, he'd go to jail.

As opposed to Zimmerman and Rittenhouse, who can shoot people and not go to jail.

Yes in self defense which is proven fact and you know it is

 

[CletusSnow]

I think you fail to understand the implication of institutional power. Crime isn't an institutional power. It's a crime and we spend lots of money prosecuting people for breaking it.

My point about Rittenhouse and Zimmerman is that they shot blacks or black allies, but because of white privilege and a shitload of money, they were able to con stupid juries into thinking that gunning down unarmed people half your size is "Self-defense".

People who are put on trial for their lives will spend money for representation to preserve their freedom. Nothing new there nor do I think you’d oppose that privilege.
That aside, were you on the jury? Do you know all the facts of the two cases?
I guarantee you don’t. You don’t understand the legal principles involved or the rights Americans have to exercise them.
Just as you have the right to keep yammering on about the topic, though you clearly don’t understand it.

 

[AZrailwhale]

I think you fail to understand the implication of institutional power. Crime isn't an institutional power. It's a crime and we spend lots of money prosecuting people for breaking it.

My point about Rittenhouse and Zimmerman is that they shot blacks or black allies, but because of white privilege and a shitload of money, they were able to con stupid juries into thinking that gunning down unarmed people half your size is "Self-defense".

Bullcrap. In both cases the actions of the defendants were clear self-defense.

 

[JoeB131]

People who are put on trial for their lives will spend money for representation to preserve their freedom. Nothing new there nor do I think you’d oppose that privilege.
That aside, were you on the jury? Do you know all the facts of the two cases?

Actually, I probably know more facts than the jury did.

For instance, the Jury in Rittenhouse's case didn't hear about how he wished he could shoot a black man running out of a CVS, or how he beat the snot out of a 14-year-old girl who was fighting his sister, or how he had a few beers with the Proud Boys and exchanged racist salutes with them.

Because Judge Senile ruled all these things irrelevant.

 

[JoeB131]

Bullcrap. In both cases the actions of the defendants were clear self-defense.

Shooting unarmed people is self-defense? Interesting.

 

[Lockback]

Shooting unarmed people is self-defense? Interesting.

Stop lying.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Actually, I probably know more facts than the jury did.

For instance, the Jury in Rittenhouse's case didn't hear about how he wished he could shoot a black man running out of a CVS, or how he beat the snot out of a 14-year-old girl who was fighting his sister, or how he had a few beers with the Proud Boys and exchanged racist salutes with them.

Because Judge Senile ruled all these things irrelevant.

Unlike you I have a memory. You made up your mind long before ANY of those items came to the attention of anyone. You were demanding Rittenhouse be declared guilty even before charges were filed. You continued all through the trial.