1. Nixon's actions on Civil Rights shows that he was NOT "pandering" or "appealing" to the Southern Racists. That is the core of the Southern Strategy myth debunked right there.
Nope. It isn't. Here's what it is:
You keep bringing up "Nixon" as if he's somehow part of this point. He isn't.
Nixon was a politician. Politicians are not strategists, and strategists are not politicians. Just as baseball general managers aren't
players. The
strategist maps out the
plan to get the politician elected; he doesn't issue policy. The
politician takes the office and executes the policy; he doesn't
plan the election.
What Nixon did or didn't do in office is irrelevant to the strategy of getting him in
to that office. And that's what we're on.
2. The strategists word's do not trump reality.
No they don't. They
are reality.
Again, same analogy --- you don't ask the shortstop how they made the trade for the relief pitcher.... you ask the general manager. So I quoted them.
3. THat chairman was a baby when those actions too place. ANd his words to not trump documented historical facts.
"That chairman was a baby"

Irrelevant. A Chairman doesn't speak for "the organization in the time since I've been an adult" -- he speaks for the organization. Period. You can whine and stomp your feet all you like but it's on the record. It was already on the record from the strategists, and the Chairman verified it.
ANY of us can and do cite history that happened well before we personally were born. That doesn't somehow whisk it off into neverneverland where nothing happened that you didn't see. That's why we have history. And quotes are part of that history.
4. When you support the Southern Strategy Myth, you are supporting the Myth that half the us population supports a racist party and it's racist policies. You are calling them racists. You are pissing them off and terrorizing the other half.
Nope. Non sequitur. A Southern Strategy as described isn't racism per se --- it's race
baiting. Two different things.
Rac
ism is the belief that one race is superior to another. Race
baiting is a manipulative process to exploit those who believe the former. Doesn't mean the opportunist doing the manipulating has to believe it
himself.
Take Donald Rump. Please. Is he
personally bigoted against Mexicans? Muslims? Native Americans? Women? Debate moderators? People with congenital muscular disabilities? I don't see evidence that he is. Has he however
manipulated his audiences' bigotry against those groups? Bingo. Every chance he gets every day whenever a camera shows up and all through the night on Twitter. The only stance I can remember him taking
personally against any of these groups is Rosie O'Donnell, but that's an individual and that's expressing a personal conflict, not manipulating somebody else into one.
That's not expressing personal racism or bigotry. That's
fomenting it in
other people for one's own gain. In the same way he never
personally took a swing at a rally protestor --- he manipulates others into doing that.
That's the difference between race baiting and racism. The latter is a personal trait expressed out of ignorance. The former is a manipulative tool to mine personal gain from
other people's ignorance.
And that's what we have in the Southern Strategy -- one political party mining votes from an ignorant bloc simply because they deliver a lot of votes, after another political party did the same thing. Also known as pandering.
Mind you, they're not mutually exclusive. Rump
might still be a bigot, personally. Kevin Phillips or Lee Atwater
might have been a racist. We don't have enough info. Hell I don't even have enough info to say that "Colonel Joe" Simmons, the re-founder off the Ku Klux Klan, was a racist
personally. Any of them may be, or may not -- but they're all
opportunists. They all
milked racism to get what they wanted. By manipulating other people to do the dirty work.
You are tearing this nation apart for partisan gain.