Here is something basic republicans do not understand about poverty

[Billy000]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Here are some basic facts:

1) All or most of those workers can’t find better paying jobs because they don’t exist. Only SOME of those people would succeed because higher paying jobs are scarce.

2) Let’s say they all did find better paying jobs. Who would be left behind to fill those supermarket positions that are the backbone of the economy?

3) Yes, it is her fault for having a child she can’t afford, but it isn’t the child’s fault, is it? The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts? Obviously that doesn’t make any sense.


The quote in your OP needs a link.

Actually your OP needs a link. Moving to General Discussion

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Or, you could try taking responsibility for the children you produce, instead, billy.

 

[JGalt]

The only thing I need to understand about poverty is "**** you. Go be poor somewhere else...."

That's what I tell assholes who try to bum cigarettes or a dollar from me: A big "**** off."

They always seem to comply.

 

[Billy000]

The only thing I need to understand about poverty is "**** you. Go be poor somewhere else...."

That's what I tell assholes who try to bum cigarettes or a dollar from me: A big "**** off."

They always seem to comply.

We get it. You’re a piece of shit.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Here are some basic facts:

1) All or most of those workers can’t find better paying jobs because they don’t exist. Only SOME of those people would succeed because higher paying jobs are scarce.

2) Let’s say they all did find better paying jobs. Who would be left behind to fill those supermarket positions that are the backbone of the economy?

3) Yes, it is her fault for having a child she can’t afford, but it isn’t the child’s fault, is it? The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts? Obviously that doesn’t make any sense.

Then why don't you sell everything you have and give it to her so you can apply for sainthood.

*****SMILE*****

 

[justinacolmena]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Dead-beat dads aren't Republicans.

 

[Billy000]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Here are some basic facts:

1) All or most of those workers can’t find better paying jobs because they don’t exist. Only SOME of those people would succeed because higher paying jobs are scarce.

2) Let’s say they all did find better paying jobs. Who would be left behind to fill those supermarket positions that are the backbone of the economy?

3) Yes, it is her fault for having a child she can’t afford, but it isn’t the child’s fault, is it? The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts? Obviously that doesn’t make any sense.

View attachment 421975

Then why don't you sell everything you have and give it to her so you can apply for sainthood.

*****SMILE*****

Even if I did, it wouldn’t solve the problem would it?

 

[JGalt]

The only thing I need to understand about poverty is "**** you. Go be poor somewhere else...."

That's what I tell assholes who try to bum cigarettes or a dollar from me: A big "**** off."

They always seem to comply.

We get it. You’re a piece of shit.

We also get it. You're a poor lowlife who seems to think he has a right to a portion of what I own.

Like I said, go be poor somewhere else.

 

[Polishprince]

The only thing I need to understand about poverty is "**** you. Go be poor somewhere else...."

That's what I tell assholes who try to bum cigarettes or a dollar from me: A big "**** off."

They always seem to comply.

That's not me.

I had a discussion with a couple of panhandlers in the tremendous city of Youngstown a couple of years ago.

I explained to them that people don't carry much spare change around, they need to get Square readers to collect their donations electronically.

 

[Billy000]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Dead-beat dads aren't Republicans.

Are you ******* kidding me? Most of them are lol. Most of them would be Trumptards.

 

[Billy000]

The only thing I need to understand about poverty is "**** you. Go be poor somewhere else...."

That's what I tell assholes who try to bum cigarettes or a dollar from me: A big "**** off."

They always seem to comply.

We get it. You’re a piece of shit.

We also get it. You're a poor lowlife who seems to think he has a right to a portion of what I own.

Like I said, go be poor somewhere else.

Honestly you just come across as insecure. You feel the need to stomp on someone weaker because deep down you’re a whiny little *****.

 

[justinacolmena]

Are you ******* kidding me? Most of them are lol. Most of them would be Trumptards.

No they're Democrats. They're on the labor union. A guy can arrange to have his wife fired if she won't cooperate.

 

[JGalt]

The only thing I need to understand about poverty is "**** you. Go be poor somewhere else...."

That's what I tell assholes who try to bum cigarettes or a dollar from me: A big "**** off."

They always seem to comply.

We get it. You’re a piece of shit.

We also get it. You're a poor lowlife who seems to think he has a right to a portion of what I own.

Like I said, go be poor somewhere else.

Honestly you just come across as insecure. You feel the need to stomp on someone weaker because deep down you’re a whiny little *****.

You're the one whining "ooohhhhh woe is meeee....oooohhh those poor poor peopleeee..."

**** them. Now get the **** off my lawn.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Here are some basic facts:

1) All or most of those workers can’t find better paying jobs because they don’t exist. Only SOME of those people would succeed because higher paying jobs are scarce.

2) Let’s say they all did find better paying jobs. Who would be left behind to fill those supermarket positions that are the backbone of the economy?

3) Yes, it is her fault for having a child she can’t afford, but it isn’t the child’s fault, is it? The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts? Obviously that doesn’t make any sense.

View attachment 421975

Then why don't you sell everything you have and give it to her so you can apply for sainthood.

*****SMILE*****

Even if I did, it wouldn’t solve the problem would it?

Hopefully you wouldn't be able to afford to post here anymore. So... Yes it might help.

However if you're suggesting that your giving everything to her still wouldn't help then the question would be why anyone should give in the first place.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[justinacolmena]

We also get it. You're a poor lowlife who seems to think he has a right to a portion of what I own.

Like I said, go be poor somewhere else.

They're all on the same labor union with the Democrat Party. Why can't they keep or save any of their overtime union wages for all that work on the clock? A guy can't get a haircut without his buddy, and the boss can't cut his hair without cutting all his employees' hair, and pretty soo they're all skinheads. And a woman can't show up at that jobsite unless she's a total dyke --- and all workplaces are strictly segregated by sex due to sexual harassment policies and hostile environment etc. --- notwithstanding federal non-discrimination laws on the books, only to be enforced against Republicans.

 

[Billy000]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Here are some basic facts:

1) All or most of those workers can’t find better paying jobs because they don’t exist. Only SOME of those people would succeed because higher paying jobs are scarce.

2) Let’s say they all did find better paying jobs. Who would be left behind to fill those supermarket positions that are the backbone of the economy?

3) Yes, it is her fault for having a child she can’t afford, but it isn’t the child’s fault, is it? The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts? Obviously that doesn’t make any sense.

View attachment 421975

Then why don't you sell everything you have and give it to her so you can apply for sainthood.

*****SMILE*****

Even if I did, it wouldn’t solve the problem would it?

View attachment 421977

Hopefully you wouldn't be able to afford to post here anymore. So... Yes it might help.

However if you're suggesting that your giving everything to her still wouldn't help then the question would be why anyone should give in the first place.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Well the logic is pretty simple. Businesses need to pay their employees more. That would solve the problem. You’re welcome.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Here are some basic facts:

1) All or most of those workers can’t find better paying jobs because they don’t exist. Only SOME of those people would succeed because higher paying jobs are scarce.

2) Let’s say they all did find better paying jobs. Who would be left behind to fill those supermarket positions that are the backbone of the economy?

3) Yes, it is her fault for having a child she can’t afford, but it isn’t the child’s fault, is it? The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts? Obviously that doesn’t make any sense.

Last time I had a conversation about the personal life of a walmart worker (cashier and her kids) was about 2 years ago....I was buying for my #6 step grandchild and I being me----------was buying a bit of everything baby related to send to the new grand---cloths, shoes, socks, bottles, toys, blankets, sheets, baby tylenol, diapers, etc---you know all the basics and all those things new parents can use----I got in line to pay for the items and made the mistake of saying---that the items were for the latest grandbaby. The cashier was pregnant and started to cry. She was on # 4 child with #3 sperm donor and unmarried....turns out non of her deadbeat sperm donors and non of the deadbeat sperm donors parents cared enough to help out. She was struggling and couldn't provide enough for the 3 that she already had. Why the hell was she having more kids and with more pathetic excuses for sperm donors with their own POS worthless parents. I can already tell you that her 4 kids will be nothing but a drain on the rest of society prison and welfare system for their entire lives.

Don't Breed them, if you can't FEED them. The more kids you have the less and less likely that you will ever be able to support yourself...and generally the less and less that your kids will have. Poverty will never improve until we stop paying idiots to have more kids.

And PS--the world is already grossly over populated.

 

[justinacolmena]

and you are forgetting--separation of church and state

Well the logic is pretty simple. Businesses need to pay their employees more. That would solve the problem. You’re welcome.

Then the businesses need to charge their customers more --- and a loaf of bread costs a wheelbarrowful of cash.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Here are some basic facts:

1) All or most of those workers can’t find better paying jobs because they don’t exist. Only SOME of those people would succeed because higher paying jobs are scarce.

2) Let’s say they all did find better paying jobs. Who would be left behind to fill those supermarket positions that are the backbone of the economy?

3) Yes, it is her fault for having a child she can’t afford, but it isn’t the child’s fault, is it? The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts? Obviously that doesn’t make any sense.

Your feelings are not facts sweetheart.

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Here are some basic facts:

1) All or most of those workers can’t find better paying jobs because they don’t exist. Only SOME of those people would succeed because higher paying jobs are scarce.

2) Let’s say they all did find better paying jobs. Who would be left behind to fill those supermarket positions that are the backbone of the economy?

3) Yes, it is her fault for having a child she can’t afford, but it isn’t the child’s fault, is it? The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts? Obviously that doesn’t make any sense.

View attachment 421975

Then why don't you sell everything you have and give it to her so you can apply for sainthood.

*****SMILE*****

Even if I did, it wouldn’t solve the problem would it?

View attachment 421977

Hopefully you wouldn't be able to afford to post here anymore. So... Yes it might help.

However if you're suggesting that your giving everything to her still wouldn't help then the question would be why anyone should give in the first place.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Well the logic is pretty simple. Businesses need to pay their employees more. That would solve the problem. You’re welcome.

You can run your business however you like.

Let us know how that goes sugar.

 

[Indeependent]

Republicans will say “well if that ***** wants more money and not work at Wal-Mart anymore, she should find a better paying job! It’s her fault for having the kid!”

Here are some basic facts:

1) All or most of those workers can’t find better paying jobs because they don’t exist. Only SOME of those people would succeed because higher paying jobs are scarce.

2) Let’s say they all did find better paying jobs. Who would be left behind to fill those supermarket positions that are the backbone of the economy?

3) Yes, it is her fault for having a child she can’t afford, but it isn’t the child’s fault, is it? The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts? Obviously that doesn’t make any sense.

The child must suffer because her working mother makes peanuts