Hegseth defends returning Confederate monument to Arlington National Cemetery

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"Psst... did ya hear that, fellas?"

 

[rightwinger]

Slavery was legal and Constitutionally protected.

Abolitionists didn’t have the legal ability to abolish it.

Abolitionists didn’t abolish it

They did convince everyone how evil it is

 

[OODA_Loop]

Abolitionists didn’t abolish it

They did convince everyone how evil it is

Evil notwithstanding abolition didn’t not have the then force of law behind it

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Evil notwithstanding abolition didn’t not have the then force of law behind it

Until we killed enough slaver traitors, that it ended up being the law.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Until we killed enough slaver traitors, that it ended up being the law.

So the answer is war and killing in place of Constitutional process.

 

[rightwinger]

Evil notwithstanding abolition didn’t not have the then force of law behind it

That is why we had a Civil War
The South thought slavery was worth dying for
The North thought the United States was worth dying for

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So the answer is war and killing in place of Constitutional process.

Apparently that's the wrong answer, as the slaver traitors found out. They named themselves traitors due to a president being Constitutionally elected. Because they knew what was coming.

Constitutionally.

So they chose war over constitutional process.

 

[BS Filter]

I love all the self-righteous democrats who hate their democrat forefathers who fought every Amendment that gave former slaves citizenship rights.

 

[OODA_Loop]

That is why we had a Civil War
The South thought slavery was worth dying for
The North thought the United States was worth dying for

The South wanted to protect the engine of their agrarian economy and had watched failed compromises prior.

The north didn’t have the constitutional
Legal standing to abolish so chose provocation to ultimately war

Shall we apply the same process today
To any repugnant issue either side doesnt have the legal ability to abolish?

War?

 

[rightwinger]

The South wanted to protect the engine of their agrarian economy and had watched failed compromises prior.

The north didn’t have the constitutional
Legal standing to abolish so chose provocation to ultimately war

Shall we apply the same process today
To any repugnant issue either side doesnt have the legal ability to abolish?

War?

The South was driven by morons

Morons who thought Lincoln would end slavery and pushed through secessions

Morons who thought attacking a US fort was a good idea

Morons who thought they could win a war against the heavily industrialized north

 

[BrokeLoser]

The South was driven by morons

Morons who thought Lincoln would end slavery and pushed through secessions

Morons who thought attacking a US fort was a good idea

Morons who thought they could win a war against the heavily industrialized north

“Morons”?
Could they define ‘woman’?

 

[rightwinger]

“Morons”?
Could they define ‘woman’?

WTF are you babbling about?
Is that really the best you could come up with?

 

[BrokeLoser]

WTF are you babbling about?
Is that really the best you could come up with?

I wish you could know how ******* insane it sounds when free shit begging, gender confused, abortion loving, Father Government dependent, homosexual atheists who couldn’t build shit with their bare hands talk shit about hard working commodity producers, farmers and ranchers.

 

[rightwinger]

I wish you could know how ******* insane it sounds when free shit begging, gender confused, abortion loving, Father Government dependent, homosexual atheists who couldn’t build shit with their bare hands talk shit about hard working commodity producers, farmers and ranchers.

So you keep babbling

 

[Stryder50]

Not the same as ownership is it?

When the State-Communism controls what type of work/job you have where you live, if you can change either or not, travel or not, what's the difference ???

 

[Bitterhook]

Recognize History? Are you serious?

Trump has spent every living minute in office with his appointed goons, to ERASE all history on Trump and others... he doesn't like...

The folks trying to erase history they don't like are the folks taking the statues down and attempting to remove all reference to the Civil War and reconciliation.

As little as 50 years ago (August 5th, 1975) General Robert E Lee's citizenship was restored posthumously with a vote in both houses of Congress. Ten Democrats in the House voted against the measure, and the Senate voted in favor of the measure unanimously.

Just another example of history some folks don't like.

 

[BS Filter]

The folks trying to erase history they don't like are the folks taking the statues down and attempting to remove all reference to the Civil War and reconciliation.

As little as 50 years ago (August 5th, 1975) General Robert E Lee's citizenship was restored posthumously with a vote in both houses of Congress. Ten Democrats in the House voted against the measure, and the Senate voted in favor of the measure unanimously.

Democrats are trying to remove all reminders of the civil war because they are the ones who fought to keep slavery.

 

[rightwinger]

The folks trying to erase history they don't like are the folks taking the statues down and attempting to remove all reference to the Civil War and reconciliation.

Nobody is denying the Civil War
What they are denying is that Confederate leaders are worth honoring

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats are trying to remove all reminders of the civil war because they are the ones who fought to keep slavery.

You have it backwards don’t ya?

It is REPUBLICANS honoring the legacy of the Confederacy

 

[Bitterhook]

Nobody is denying the Civil War
What they are denying is that Confederate leaders are worth honoring

I didn't say anything about anyone denying anything.
I simply mentioned folks who want to remove statues and pretend that would make a difference to historical events.