Hate Rising: White supremacy's rise in the U.S.
- Thread starter Superbadbrutha
- Start date
- Banned
- #43
Trump & Trump's 'deplorables' have given rise to the WHITE NATIONALISM within the US in the past 3 years.
Those poor whites had it sooooooooo bad keeping those black slaves down on the farm for DECADES, profiting on the backs of slave labor; just TERRIBLE.
It's horrible being white, abused, and rich in America; just horrible.
Natural Citizen
American Made
- Aug 8, 2016
- 30,483
- 31,312
- 2,945
eeyep.
SaxxyBlues
Gold Member
- Nov 15, 2016
- 2,792
- 273
- 140
Aba Incieni
Gold Member
- Dec 13, 2017
- 8,910
- 1,282
- 290
Well, the OP says they're on the rise. You're going to have to choose a side. Choose wisely.
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Fake
- Thread starter
- #48
For showing the racism of a so called family group.
- Banned
- #49
No; you are wrong. Choosing a 'side' is not a requirement.
One can stay out of the fray & still succeed; playing wisely is the 'choice'
if you chose not to decide you still have made a choice
petro
Diamond Member
One has to wonder why the fear.
After all, they claim they are just dumb toothless hillbillies.
Why are they so scared of Jethro?
- Thread starter
- #51
Which side are you choosing, never mind I already know.
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
You go by the name of ‘super bad black self-segregationist’ and you ***** about other segregationists.
AvgGuyIA
Gold Member
. The parties never switched sides. We have video.
- Thread starter
- #54
………...and you came up with that bullshit all by yourself.
AvgGuyIA
Gold Member
. I'd like some ******* liberal tel us which conservative groups haven't been identified as a hate group by the SPLC? That will tell you how much bullshit that organization is.
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
No, you did.
JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,894
- 2,220
I realize your question is just rhetorical bullpoopoo, but I'll indulge you anyway for laughs.
A Demagogic Bully
According to the SPLC, America is rife with dangerous “hate groups”: the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, racist skinheads, anti-government militia groups, radical-right terrorists, and many more. “We’re currently tracking more than 1,600 extremist groups operating across the country,” the SPLC’s website claims. Readers of SPLC’s press releases, reports, and—importantly—direct-mail solicitations would be justified in imagining an America teeming with smoldering churches and synagogues, cross burnings, storm troopers bearing swastikas, and even lynchings.
Reality is different. In fact, racial tolerance is at an all-time high, diversity is universally promoted as a civic virtue, and “hate crimes,” as defined and reported by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, have declined over the past decade to fewer than 6,000 incidents a year, a modest number in a country with 326 million people. The principal threats of radical extremism in the United States today are jihadist attacks (radical Islam), militant anti-police rioters (such as Black Lives Matter), and masked Antifa (so-called “anti-fascist”) mobs shutting down free speech on college campuses and violently protesting the election of President Donald J. Trump, while the greatest perpetrators of violence in America are criminal street gangs—including the deadly MS-13—that have turned some of our inner cities into war zones.
The virulently anti-Trump “Resistance” movement has fueled partisan acrimony with poisonous rhetoric, to the extent of condoning—and in some cases even encouraging—physical attacks against political opponents. Yet the SPLC largely ignores such groups, focusing instead on the moribund KKK (many of whose estimated 2,000 members are thought to be FBI informants) and similar relics from the Jim Crow era. The SPLC myopically focuses on white racism directed at minority groups, especially African-Americans. A former SPLC lawyer, Gloria Browne, charged that SPLC programs were calculated to cash in on “black pain and white guilt.” Racism undoubtedly exists, but it is neither pervasive nor exclusively practiced by whites.
Despite numerous exposés over the years in publications spanning the political spectrum—including Harper’s, The Progressive, The Weekly Standard, Reason, the Baltimore Sun, and even the SPLC’s hometown newspaper, the Montgomery Advertiser—the liberal establishment continues to treat the group as credible, largely because its preoccupation with right-wing bigotry aligns with the stereotypical view of liberals who dominate newspapers like the Washington Postand New York Times. In our polarized culture, the epithet “hate group” is the ultimate slander of political opponents. The SPLC’s spurious imprimatur gives mere calumny gravitas, allowing liberal journalists to wield its highly charged judgments as a weapon, citing it as if it were a dispassionate authority. Many liberal (or merely lazy) journalists discredit conservative organizations by noting that they are “listed by the SPLC as a hate group,” treating its often dubious designations as gospel truth.
One would expect an organization that holds itself out as an expert on hate groups to have a consistent definition of that term, but in Humpty-Dumpty fashion, it turns out that a “hate group” is whatever the SPLC decides it is. The SPLC claims that “917 Hate Groups are currently operating in the U.S.,” but offers only vague guidelines for what qualifies: “groups hav[ing] beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.” Despite its insinuations that hate groups are inherently violent, the SPLC casts a much broader net: “Hate group activities can include criminal acts, marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafletting or publishing” (emphasis added). Indeed, some of the SPLC’s hate “groups” are merely websites or publications—even record labels and religious sects.
This fluid and subjective definition allows the SPLC to lump together—along with the KKK, neo-Nazis, and racist skinheads—such varied groups as religious-liberty advocates Alliance Defending Freedom and Liberty Counsel; pro-family groups such as the World Congress of Families; Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy; the David Horowitz Freedom Center and, separately, its Jihad Watch program; Ann Corcoran’s Refugee Resettlement Watch; and many immigration-reform groups, including CIS and FAIR. Without irony, SPLC president Richard Cohen has defended designating the Family Research Council as a hate group “because it traffics in incendiary name-calling.” To the SPLC’s credit, it also classifies the Nation of Islam, the New Black Panther Party, and a few other black separatist groups as hate groups, though these organizations are seldom mentioned in its stream of emails and bulletins.
In addition to hate groups, SPLC tracks a broader category of “extremist groups,” with an equally amorphous definition; apparently all hate groups qualify as extremist, but not vice versa. The SPLC considers as “extremist” eminent political scientist Charles Murray, evangelical historian David Barton (of WallBuilders), author Peter Brimelow, the Social Contract Press, Joseph Farah’s WorldNetDaily, and many other proponents of traditional marriage, border security, and immigration restrictions—views held by millions of Americans. This is not to suggest that all groups and persons labeled by the SPLC as “extremist” are necessarily laudable, but reasoned discourse requires that disagreement be expressed through facts and argument, not pejorative name-calling, innuendo, and guilt by association. The SPLC deliberately blurs the distinction between true hate groups, peaceful activists, and reputable organizations with which it disagrees.
Reality is different. In fact, racial tolerance is at an all-time high, diversity is universally promoted as a civic virtue, and “hate crimes,” as defined and reported by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, have declined over the past decade to fewer than 6,000 incidents a year, a modest number in a country with 326 million people. The principal threats of radical extremism in the United States today are jihadist attacks (radical Islam), militant anti-police rioters (such as Black Lives Matter), and masked Antifa (so-called “anti-fascist”) mobs shutting down free speech on college campuses and violently protesting the election of President Donald J. Trump, while the greatest perpetrators of violence in America are criminal street gangs—including the deadly MS-13—that have turned some of our inner cities into war zones.
The virulently anti-Trump “Resistance” movement has fueled partisan acrimony with poisonous rhetoric, to the extent of condoning—and in some cases even encouraging—physical attacks against political opponents. Yet the SPLC largely ignores such groups, focusing instead on the moribund KKK (many of whose estimated 2,000 members are thought to be FBI informants) and similar relics from the Jim Crow era. The SPLC myopically focuses on white racism directed at minority groups, especially African-Americans. A former SPLC lawyer, Gloria Browne, charged that SPLC programs were calculated to cash in on “black pain and white guilt.” Racism undoubtedly exists, but it is neither pervasive nor exclusively practiced by whites.
Despite numerous exposés over the years in publications spanning the political spectrum—including Harper’s, The Progressive, The Weekly Standard, Reason, the Baltimore Sun, and even the SPLC’s hometown newspaper, the Montgomery Advertiser—the liberal establishment continues to treat the group as credible, largely because its preoccupation with right-wing bigotry aligns with the stereotypical view of liberals who dominate newspapers like the Washington Postand New York Times. In our polarized culture, the epithet “hate group” is the ultimate slander of political opponents. The SPLC’s spurious imprimatur gives mere calumny gravitas, allowing liberal journalists to wield its highly charged judgments as a weapon, citing it as if it were a dispassionate authority. Many liberal (or merely lazy) journalists discredit conservative organizations by noting that they are “listed by the SPLC as a hate group,” treating its often dubious designations as gospel truth.
One would expect an organization that holds itself out as an expert on hate groups to have a consistent definition of that term, but in Humpty-Dumpty fashion, it turns out that a “hate group” is whatever the SPLC decides it is. The SPLC claims that “917 Hate Groups are currently operating in the U.S.,” but offers only vague guidelines for what qualifies: “groups hav[ing] beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.” Despite its insinuations that hate groups are inherently violent, the SPLC casts a much broader net: “Hate group activities can include criminal acts, marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafletting or publishing” (emphasis added). Indeed, some of the SPLC’s hate “groups” are merely websites or publications—even record labels and religious sects.
This fluid and subjective definition allows the SPLC to lump together—along with the KKK, neo-Nazis, and racist skinheads—such varied groups as religious-liberty advocates Alliance Defending Freedom and Liberty Counsel; pro-family groups such as the World Congress of Families; Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy; the David Horowitz Freedom Center and, separately, its Jihad Watch program; Ann Corcoran’s Refugee Resettlement Watch; and many immigration-reform groups, including CIS and FAIR. Without irony, SPLC president Richard Cohen has defended designating the Family Research Council as a hate group “because it traffics in incendiary name-calling.” To the SPLC’s credit, it also classifies the Nation of Islam, the New Black Panther Party, and a few other black separatist groups as hate groups, though these organizations are seldom mentioned in its stream of emails and bulletins.
In addition to hate groups, SPLC tracks a broader category of “extremist groups,” with an equally amorphous definition; apparently all hate groups qualify as extremist, but not vice versa. The SPLC considers as “extremist” eminent political scientist Charles Murray, evangelical historian David Barton (of WallBuilders), author Peter Brimelow, the Social Contract Press, Joseph Farah’s WorldNetDaily, and many other proponents of traditional marriage, border security, and immigration restrictions—views held by millions of Americans. This is not to suggest that all groups and persons labeled by the SPLC as “extremist” are necessarily laudable, but reasoned discourse requires that disagreement be expressed through facts and argument, not pejorative name-calling, innuendo, and guilt by association. The SPLC deliberately blurs the distinction between true hate groups, peaceful activists, and reputable organizations with which it disagrees.
There is 14 in that article alone.
Now tell me why none of this counts, has long been debunked and are not object due to institutionalized racism.
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 51,805
- 43,412
- 3,615
So much rubbish, Super Bad.
The big Washington DC Alt-right Nazii KKK demonstration in August attracted just 2 dozen white supremacists. Considering the fact that Law Enforcement traditionally puts moles into extremist groups, and the media does as well, the actual number of White Supremacists at their big annual event was probably less than half if you subtract those working undercover.
You can give money to the SPLC if you like, and if you are "impressed" with their rubbish. But the facts are that if CNN were to quit paying Dave Duke to be a contributor and the FBI were to withdraw their moles, white supremacism would disappear over night.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 113,045
- 53,541
- 2,290
Are all 6 of the white supremacists hanging out together again? Of course, don't worry about antifa or black lives matter, the ones rioting, destroying property and keeping people from speaking on college campuses...... pay no attention to their actual violence...but worry about the 6, white supremacist posers....
User901
Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 75
- 13
- 21
"Boo Boo Boo.... Poo Poo On You.. I Ran Out Of Argument.. You're A Racist.. And Ima Sue"
Last edited:
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Naturalized American Citizen from Lebanon Rams Synagogue in Michigan- Started by Carl in Michigan
- Replies: 0
-
Video: Trans people go to Muslim countries and encounter transphobia- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 13
-
Trump considering lifting the Jones Act due to ongoing fuckups.- Started by the watcher
- Replies: 1
-
New Yorks version of remedial justice, rapists are people too.
- Started by the watcher
- Replies: 0
-
Keeping ICE away from polling places a top priority for Democrats- Started by LeftofLeft
- Replies: 18
Latest Discussions
-
Naturalized American Citizen from Lebanon Rams Synagogue in Michigan
- Latest: Carl in Michigan
-
NO EXIT? How will the U S be able to extricate itself from Trump's "little excursion"?
- Latest: popscottpopscott
-
