Harris Reportedly Fuming Bigly After the Disastrous Interview

[WEATHER53]

It was a news interview in the enemy camp, where her agenda called for getting out her message (whether Fox viewers wanted to hear it or not), not being bullied into blunders or revelations damaging to her campaign, or the Administration she presently serves. Brett did not want to be a vehicle for the Democrat message. Tough luck. She did not want to answer for policy, Joe and Joe alone has responsibility for, but as VP, it was her job to take the abuse, without throwing The President or the Administration under the bus for her own daultful benefit. Tough luck. You watched somebody mission/message focused, wishing to get a pound of flesh, but come up hungry, though you had and have no intention to vote for, mind made up. To suspect a candidate would sit in the enemy camp on nationwide tv with some other mission, is naive, to say the least. Here's your sign:
View attachment 1027566

Remember this. It was her that sought Fox out to show us how well she could handle it.

 

[White 6]

I think she did great here... She dispelled a lot of Fox News misinformation about her being lightweight or afraid of the hard questions...
Her team now can go wholesale of Trump is senile, past it, minded by his handlers because he is only good for word salad and dancing on a stage..
Trump could never handle the hard questions... No MSNBC for him, no debates,... he can't even handle questions from his own supporters


Not really but I think she should just have said that despite Fox News years of onslaught on his age he still managed to do X, Y & Z.... But Joe like Trump is getting older... They are feeling there age and wisely Joe saw that he had do his service and he did one of the most admirable thing he ever for America, he sided aside. Ask yourself, would Trump do the same for America?

I still annoyed about how Democrats run from the border issue.

Trump cut security funding to the countries south of the border. That funding wasn't only for their safety but also Americans safety. When we have a drug crisis, he cut funding to where the war is going on..
This is the word trump doesn't understand, 'Consequences', He doesn't understand and he expects you not to understand either, He cut funding, Drug supply into US increased and those countries safety reduced. Then we got more drugs and more asylum seekers fleeing violence.
And let me get back to 'Consequences', How many time has Trump said to Americas 'How could anyone have known?', He said it for x, Y & z.. Well we know 'Consequences',.

Brett looked terrible... It was embarrassing, there wasn't even a attempt to be objective and Harris called him on it when she talked about the 'enemy within'

Agree on your first paragraph.
Not on your second. That would involve throwing Joe under the bus on age and mental ability. Nope. She had the courage to do her job, supporting the Administration, no matter if she believed it or they believed it or not, and take the hit. Until that interview, I didn't know she understood command or being responsible to take hits, for the command team by virtue of accept the VP position in that command.

For Democrats, there is no getting around the error of that uncorrected executive decision and it effects and costs to the country. They run from it, as there is no articulable justification. Perhaps if Joe had first invested the political capital to put resources in place, to deal with the mad rush, the proper vetting of the aliens, the increased need for border agents, the increased need for immigration courts, increase needs of communities, to deal with this unplanned dumping of aliens (legal and illegal), maybe they would be in a different place. But, NO. It was a day 2 executive action with nothing in place to deal with the aftermath, and severing agreement with Mexico to meter the flow. That is why they run from it, as no excuse, for it being handled the way it was. But, Joe is responsible for that executive order, and everybody knows it.

You thought there was going to be objectivity? Brett did OK, considering his mission, which was to support FOX political position as part of it's business plan, address a certain dedicated market share. limited by the knowledge and reigned in to fact, there were limits to attacking the person that very likely might be the next president, especially with FOX's past history.

The both did OK for what their missions and responsibilities were.

 

[White 6]

I hear Baier is refusing to do a second debate.

He came out of it better than Trump did in debate, but I wouldn't want to try a second bite of that apple, either.

 

[Magnus]

She also lied that Trump will put dissenters in camps. Shades of Hitler.

She is in a total panic, and her meltdown was televised. She is so enamored with herself, believing that it was her intelligence and abilities that got her to where she is, that she thought she could handle a serious interview. That alone shows what an idiot she is: she flubbed a softball question on The View, for God’s sake, and she thinks she can hold her own against Brett Baier?

Actually, Harris stated that Trump "has suggested using the military against American citizens" and has "talked about imprisoning those who disagree with him"

And yes, the orange douchebag indeed wanted to turn the armed forces against American citizens:

“I think the bigger problem are the people from within,” Trump said. “We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics.”

“And I think it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard or, if really necessary, by the military, because they can’t let that happen,” he added.

https://fox40.com/news/national-and-world-news/trump-suggests-using-national-guard-military-against-enemy-from-within/

Try to keep up.

 

[White 6]

I think that media needs to stay out of it as far as interviews are concerned. Most of them have an agenda.

I would much prefer a foreign news agency with no dog in the fight and a well educated and well mannered moderator not out to hit anyone with gotchya questions.

Understand, but do not think it possible or advisable, really.

 

[Magnus]

My favorite is the one she has recited again and again and again….

When asked about the economy?

“I grew up in a middle class household…”

Ahhh that makes me feel so much better. Guys, fear not. She has a plan, and that plan is that she grew up in a middle class household.

Really? That is what you heard? You may want to go to a good ENT specialist because you seem to have some hearing challenges.

This is what she said when asked how she would handle the economy:

1. Harris stated that she is "offering a plan to deal with what we need to do to strengthen small businesses, which are the backbone of America's economy."
2. She mentioned having a plan "that is about taking care of young parents and giving them the support they need."
3. Harris claimed that her economic plans "would strengthen our economy" and have been reviewed positively by "16 Nobel laureates, Goldman Sachs, Moody's and recently the Wall Street Journal."
4. She contrasted her plans with Trump's, stating that his plans "would make them weaker, would ignite inflation and invite a recession by the middle of next year."
5. Harris emphasized that her plans for the economy would "strengthen our country" and that people are ready for a president with "a plan for the future and a plan that is sound."
6. She criticized Trump's plan, saying it "would be, again, to give tax cuts to billionaires and the biggest corporations in our country and blow up our deficit."

In other words, she stated how she would handle the economy. And how your orange Fuhrer would bungle it.

Hope the ENT visit works out. Thoughts & prayers.

 

[White 6]

All true. However, do you not find it concerning that Brett Baier, who is supposed to be a legit journalist, is representing the Trump campaign?

Heck, I would find it concerning if you had stopped with the first part of the sentence - "he did a fine job representing Fox News's political position". Let alone representing Trump.

He is supposed to be a hard-nosed independent newsman. At least, that is what he and Fox news are pushing.

It is kind of like an adversarial newspaper back in the old day. She knew what she was in for. He had real or felt obligations, too.

The reality is, that media organization, posing as a news source does represent the Trump campaign, like it or not, and she knew this coming in, as did we all.

 

[White 6]

It was stupid. She didn't make any points at all. She went on Fox News and told the Fox news audience, "Orange man bad" instead of articulating her policies. She didn't change one vote.

I did not know yours was open to change or that you spoke for ones that were.

 

[White 6]

You understand these non-answers, pivots and dodges is what directly left to Trump's election.

There is some truth to that. I grew up in Kentucky, I have seen politician try to take both sides of an issue, in the same speech.
But, misguided backlash can go too far, and have unintended consequences. That is the problem for the ones electing trump on your reasoning.

 

[Magnus]

It is kind of like an adversarial newspaper back in the old day. She knew what she was in for. He had real or felt obligations, too.

The reality is, that media organization, posing as a news source does represent the Trump campaign, like it or not, and she knew this coming in, as did we all.

Oh, we all knew it and so it wasn't a huge risk for Kamala. But the fact is of all the commentators at Fox, Bret is the only one touted as "fair & balanced". The others are just Trump lap dogs.

And yet...even Bret shows that he is just the same. I guess, if you need to keep your job at Fox, you better toe the line.

 

[WEATHER53]

Remember this. It was her that sought Fox out to show us how well she could handle it.

What?
Crickets?

 

[Missourian]

There is some truth to that. I grew up in Kentucky, I have seen politician try to take both sides of an issue, in the same speech.
But, misguided backlash can go too far, and have unintended consequences. That is the problem for the ones electing trump on your reasoning.

Trump has already been President.

What did he bring?

Peace and peace treaties, dialog with our enemies, record low unemployment, high GDP, a stemming of the illegal migrant crisis, a rebuilding of the military, lower taxes, easing of ponderous regulations, and economic prosperity.

If these are the unintended consequences of which you speak...

...sign me up!!!

Two times even.

Kamala is nothing but a sad extension of the establishment status quo...and a terribly subpar extension at that.

Do you ever wonder why establishment Republicans AND establishment Democrats all hate Trump?

Cuz Trump ain't part of the plan.

You're no dunce...you may not even be ideologically captured. But perhaps only seeing and believing what is fed to you by a horribly biased legacy media.

Please articulate one Trump policy you oppose.

 

[WEATHER53]

Really? That is what you heard? You may want to go to a good ENT specialist because you seem to have some hearing challenges.

This is what she said when asked how she would handle the economy:

1. Harris stated that she is "offering a plan to deal with what we need to do to strengthen small businesses, which are the backbone of America's economy."
2. She mentioned having a plan "that is about taking care of young parents and giving them the support they need."
3. Harris claimed that her economic plans "would strengthen our economy" and have been reviewed positively by "16 Nobel laureates, Goldman Sachs, Moody's and recently the Wall Street Journal."
4. She contrasted her plans with Trump's, stating that his plans "would make them weaker, would ignite inflation and invite a recession by the middle of next year."
5. Harris emphasized that her plans for the economy would "strengthen our country" and that people are ready for a president with "a plan for the future and a plan that is sound."
6. She criticized Trump's plan, saying it "would be, again, to give tax cuts to billionaires and the biggest corporations in our country and blow up our deficit."

In other words, she stated how she would handle the economy. And how your orange Fuhrer would bungle it.

Hope the ENT visit works out. Thoughts & prayers.

1-6 occurred not as an items by item ordered response but rather after her middle class bright new future soliloquy
Plus it’s your summation of responses she made randomly

 

[WEATHER53]

Really? That is what you heard? You may want to go to a good ENT specialist because you seem to have some hearing challenges.

This is what she said when asked how she would handle the economy:

1. Harris stated that she is "offering a plan to deal with what we need to do to strengthen small businesses, which are the backbone of America's economy."
2. She mentioned having a plan "that is about taking care of young parents and giving them the support they need."
3. Harris claimed that her economic plans "would strengthen our economy" and have been reviewed positively by "16 Nobel laureates, Goldman Sachs, Moody's and recently the Wall Street Journal."
4. She contrasted her plans with Trump's, stating that his plans "would make them weaker, would ignite inflation and invite a recession by the middle of next year."
5. Harris emphasized that her plans for the economy would "strengthen our country" and that people are ready for a president with "a plan for the future and a plan that is sound."
6. She criticized Trump's plan, saying it "would be, again, to give tax cuts to billionaires and the biggest corporations in our country and blow up our deficit."

In other words, she stated how she would handle the economy. And how your orange Fuhrer would bungle it.

Hope the ENT visit works out. Thoughts & prayers.

Not “in other words” but rather in Your words.

 

[Independent thinker]

I did not know yours was open to change or that you spoke for ones that were.

She went on Fox News and told the Fox News audience "Orange man bad". How stupid is that?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

LOL Yeah, some retard on Twitter has the scoop on Harris's mood.

Fucking gullible retards.

Many alcoholics get very angry.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Yes, she certainly did recite her rehearsed lines, planks of her policy plans, and here stump speeches across the country, and got her message out, whether FOX Views and Trump supporters liked it or not. Kind of amazing and surprising, actually. And, all while refusing to throw Joe or administration policy under the bus, for personal political benefit. I guess she can hold her own in domestic and or international negotiations with foreign leaders also. How bout that? Who knew? Glad I voted for her, today.

Putin didn’t endorse her because she can “hold her own”. Quite the opposite in fact.

 

[otto105]

There's a stark contrast between interview styles and how those being interviewed can think on their feet.
Kamala can't think on her feet. Period. She can't do it. Dunno why. She has had a career where higher reasoning skills and fast thinking was necessary. But for whatever reason she won't or can't.
Watch Trump answer a difficult question. Proving everything that the Left says about him is untrue. Where im not a trump proselite....i do believe his campaign has been doing a much better job than Kamala's

The question was about Google sir.

 

[otto105]

My favorite is the one she has recited again and again and again….

When asked about the economy?

“I grew up in a middle class household…”

Ahhh that makes me feel so much better. Guys, fear not. She has a plan, and that plan is that she grew up in a middle class household.

Fat Elvis grew up with Fred’s disapproval looks as he kept costing him money to bail out his education and businesses.

 

[otto105]

Putin didn’t endorse her because she can “hold her own”. Quite the opposite in fact.

Hilarious

The pootin wants his easy to manipulate Fat orange Elvis.