Harris is a far-left socialist, worse than Bernie

[schmidlap]

Women and minorities should be FURIOUS Republicans are calling her a diversity hire. Insulted.

A number of Republican strategists are expressing concern over their reverting to their racist and misogynistic memes.

 

[sealybobo]

A number of Republican strategists are expressing concern over their reverting to their racist and misogynistic memes.

Mike Johnson told them to knock it off.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Republicans shut down a bipartisan Senate border security bill, claiming President Biden should instead unilaterally stop all migrants from entering the U.S. using executive orders.​

​

“No, we’re not just going to pass the buck and say that, ‘Oh, any president can walk in and secure the border,’” [Chip] Roy said, referring to Trump’s post. “All a president has to do is declare the border’s closed, and it’s closed. Well, with all due respect, that didn’t happen in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020. There were millions of people that came in the United States during those four years.”​

Chip Roy knocks Trump over border claim: ‘That didn’t happen’

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) took a dig at former President Trump in a House floor speech Tuesday, denying the former president’s claim that any executive could unilaterally close the southern border. T…

thehill.com

​

​

​

Biden Finally Got Border Numbers Down.​

​

/----/ As we have explained in the simplest terms possible, that fake bill had little to do with border security. All Dementia Joe had to do was sign an EO like Trump did. He has had constitutional authority all along. See Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution.

What’s in the Senate’s sweeping $118 billion immigration and foreign aid bill?

Along with funding for Ukraine and Israel, as well as humanitarian assistance for people fleeing Gaza, this bill is a dramatic rewriting of the asylum system.

www.pbs.org

A FUNDING BREAKDOWN​

Total size: $118.3 billion. That includes:

• About $60 billion in military aid for Ukraine
• $14.1 billion in aid for Israel
• $4.83 billion in aid for the Indo-Pacific region
• $10 billion in humanitarian assistance for Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, among other places
• $2.3 billion in refugee assistance inside the U.S.
• $20.2 billion for improvements to U.S. border security
• $2.72 billion for domestic uranium enrichment

 

[schmidlap]

/----/ As we have explained in the simplest terms possible, that fake bill had little to do with border security. All Dementia Joe had to do was sign an EO like Trump did. He has had constitutional authority all along. See Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution.

What’s in the Senate’s sweeping $118 billion immigration and foreign aid bill?

Along with funding for Ukraine and Israel, as well as humanitarian assistance for people fleeing Gaza, this bill is a dramatic rewriting of the asylum system.

www.pbs.org

A FUNDING BREAKDOWN​

Total size: $118.3 billion. That includes:

• About $60 billion in military aid for Ukraine
• $14.1 billion in aid for Israel
• $4.83 billion in aid for the Indo-Pacific region
• $10 billion in humanitarian assistance for Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, among other places
• $2.3 billion in refugee assistance inside the U.S.
• $20.2 billion for improvements to U.S. border security
• $2.72 billion for domestic uranium enrichment

False.

Lankford Releases Border Security Package With Huge Wins for Securing the Border ​

 

[Lisa558]

The Trump bum kissers are rattling their cages and flinging their dung.

Meanwhile the elderly sexual abuser/business fraud/election denier/convicted felon/p*ssy grabber who has been labeled an "asshoIe" and an "American Hitler" by his own running mate persists in alienating women voters as he has done consistently in 2018, 2020, and 2022.

YOUR side, led by the Obama cabal, just disenfranchised their own primary voters, forced him to drop out, and coronated the candidate they prefer without getting the input of a single primary voter.

All of your other crap about Trump is just the result of media brainwashing and a gullible voter.

In the meantime, I’m sticking with the side that isn’t afraid to say calling for the genocide of Jews is wrong, or is unwilling to preside over a speech to Congress by a Jew, because they’re afraid they will alienate their stark-raving mad base of antisemites by appearing tolerant of JOOOS.

Even CNN and the NYT warned Kamalot not to put a JOOOO on the ticket! That’s how antisemitic their voters are.

 

[Lisa558]

A number of Republican strategists are expressing concern over their reverting to their racist and misogynistic memes.

A number of Democrat strategists are trying to distance themselves from Jews.

NO JEWS ON PRESIDENTIAL BALLOTS OR WE RISK LOSING!

 

[schmidlap]

A number of Democrat strategists are trying to distance themselves from Jews.

NO JEWS ON PRESIDENTIAL BALLOTS OR WE RISK LOSING!

Shapiro would be a superb choice, but not in order to attract the Jewish vote that the Democratic Party can already rely upon.

Netanyahu and Likud enthusiasts are irrelevant.

 

[schmidlap]

YOUR side, led by the Obama cabal, just disenfranchised their own primary voters, forced him to drop out, and coronated the candidate they prefer without getting the input of a single primary voter.

All of your other crap about Trump is just the result of media brainwashing and a gullible voter.

In the meantime, I’m sticking with the side that isn’t afraid to say calling for the genocide of Jews is wrong, or is unwilling to preside over a speech to Congress by a Jew, because they’re afraid they will alienate their stark-raving mad base of antisemites by appearing tolerant of JOOOS.

Even CNN and the NYT warned Kamalot not to put a JOOOO on the ticket! That’s how antisemitic their voters are.

The popular, grass roots, sentiment among the Democratic electorate has been respected by the Party.

What could be more democratic?

Trumpers become upset when I cite the geezer's official, documented status as sexual abuser/business fraud/convicted felon, of course.

 

[JoeB131]

YOUR side, led by the Obama cabal, just disenfranchised their own primary voters, forced him to drop out, and coronated the candidate they prefer without getting the input of a single primary voter.

Primaries were a joke... so I don't worry about them.

Frankly, I'm a little bored with IA and NH picking our candidate.

In the meantime, I’m sticking with the side that isn’t afraid to say calling for the genocide of Jews is wrong,

But genocide committed BY Jews is okay, amiright?

 

[Lisa558]

Shapiro would be a superb choice, but not in order to attract the Jewish vote that the Democratic Party can already rely upon.

Netanyahu and Likud enthusiasts are irrelevant.

The point is Kamala has been warned NOT to pick a Jew because it will alienate the antisemitic Democrst base!

There was never a point in picking a Jew to attract Jews. That’s your Dem identity politics talking: let’s pick a black to get blacks! Let’s pick a Jew to get Jews!

You don’t find it concerning that there is such a rabid antisemitic base among Democrat voters that Kamala has been told NOT to pick a Jew or the antisemites, particularly the Muslims, will get angry?

You think the Dems would be OK with a Republican being told not to put a black on the ticket because the Neo-Nazis would object? Hah. And that’s because any neo-Nazis are a small, fringe element among Republicans, while antisemites and their protectors are numerous, and are high elected or appointed Democrats.

 

[schmidlap]

The point is Kamala has been warned NOT to pick a Jew because it will alienate the antisemitic Democrst base!

There was never a point in picking a Jew to attract Jews. That’s your Dem identity politics talking: let’s pick a black to get blacks! Let’s pick a Jew to get Jews!

You don’t find it concerning that there is such a rabid antisemitic base among Democrat voters that Kamala has been told NOT to pick a Jew or the antisemites, particularly the Muslims, will get angry?

You think the Dems would be OK with a Republican being told not to put a black on the ticket because the Neo-Nazis would object? Hah. And that’s because any neo-Nazis are a small, fringe element among Republicans, while antisemites and their protectors are numerous, and are high elected or appointed Democrats.

Why should Harris pay any more attention to such alleged "warnings" any more than Republicans to white nationalists who mince around mewling "Jews will not replace us"?

Jacob Neiheisel, a University at Buffalo political science professor who focuses on the role of religion in elections... also sees how people “on both the left and the right” could make Shapiro’s Judaism an issue, and play into antisemitic tropes of powerful Jews controlling world events. This argument could be strengthened by the fact that Harris’ husband is Jewish and has been the public face of the Biden administration’s national plan to combat antisemitism.​

​

“There are people who will not vote for Jews,” Isaacson said. “There are people whose prejudice prevents them from looking at Jews in a fair way, whether they’re running for office or seeking a job or sitting next to them at a restaurant.”​

Will Josh Shapiro’s Jewishness hurt or help a Harris ticket?

Jewish Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro is on the shortlist for Kamala Harris' vice president. Will antisemitism derail his nomination?

forward.com

​

​

​

 

[Curried Goats]

The point is Kamala has been warned NOT to pick a Jew because it will alienate the antisemitic Democrst base!

There was never a point in picking a Jew to attract Jews. That’s your Dem identity politics talking: let’s pick a black to get blacks! Let’s pick a Jew to get Jews!

You don’t find it concerning that there is such a rabid antisemitic base among Democrat voters that Kamala has been told NOT to pick a Jew or the antisemites, particularly the Muslims, will get angry?

You think the Dems would be OK with a Republican being told not to put a black on the ticket because the Neo-Nazis would object? Hah. And that’s because any neo-Nazis are a small, fringe element among Republicans, while antisemites and their protectors are numerous, and are high elected or appointed Democrats.

That's a real bad victim complex you got there Lisa.

You know she was told this do you?

Aside: Jamie Raskin would be my dream pick. Love that guy.

 

[Cellblock2429]

False.

Lankford Releases Border Security Package With Huge Wins for Securing the Border ​

/—-/ What’s false? Did Trump sign an EO to close the border? Didn’t Dementia Joe repeal Trump’s EO with his own EO? And didn’t Joe write his own EO last month?
So, what’s false about my post?

 

[Lisa558]

Why should Harris pay any more attention to such alleged "warnings" any more than Republicans to white nationalists who mince around mewling "Jews will not replace us"?

View attachment 983787​

Jacob Neiheisel, a University at Buffalo political science professor who focuses on the role of religion in elections... also sees how people “on both the left and the right” could make Shapiro’s Judaism an issue, and play into antisemitic tropes of powerful Jews controlling world events. This argument could be strengthened by the fact that Harris’ husband is Jewish and has been the public face of the Biden administration’s national plan to combat antisemitism.​

​

“There are people who will not vote for Jews,” Isaacson said. “There are people whose prejudice prevents them from looking at Jews in a fair way, whether they’re running for office or seeking a job or sitting next to them at a restaurant.”​

Will Josh Shapiro’s Jewishness hurt or help a Harris ticket?

Jewish Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro is on the shortlist for Kamala Harris' vice president. Will antisemitism derail his nomination?

forward.com

​

​

​

Answer: “Jews will not replace us” is a handful of fringe bigots from 8 years ago. Got anything from THIS decade?!

Kamala is the CURRENT Democrat nominee presiding over a party so infected with antisemites that she is being warned not to put a Jew Boy on the ticket.

THAT is the difference. Damn but the ignorance of Democrats is not only infuriating, but dangerous. They are showing their massive antisemitic base that they will not side with Jews.

 

[struth]

Harris was considered the most leftist demafasict in the senate while she was there.

This is why Trump has a 63 percent chance of winning according to the betting markets

 

[struth]

That you are too stupid to realize that you are being played by big corporations, that's on you.

Why do you think we have an "illegal problem", it's not because Kamala was "Border Czar" (which she never was, by the way).

It's because those big corporations want cheap labor they can exploit.

Xiden and his border czar harris made it legal to hire illegals

They stopped enforcing the law and encouraged businesses to hire illegals

So yes they are the problem

 

[JoeB131]

Xiden and his border czar harris made it legal to hire illegals

They stopped enforcing the law and encouraged businesses to hire illegals

So yes they are the problem

No, they made it legal to hire asylum seekers. This is nothing new. My wife has been working under this program since she claimed asylum in 2017.

 

[JoeB131]

The point is Kamala has been warned NOT to pick a Jew because it will alienate the antisemitic Democrst base!

Warned by who? Who said this, exactly? Kamala's husband is Jewish, if there were any anti-Semite (which is anyone who is critical of Israel in your world) on our side, they'd probably be upset about that.

There was never a point in picking a Jew to attract Jews. That’s your Dem identity politics talking: let’s pick a black to get blacks! Let’s pick a Jew to get Jews!

Except not really, but do go on. The problem is that Jews aren't any different than any other group of white people other than their religion, and America wants their leaders to be Christians.

You don’t find it concerning that there is such a rabid antisemitic base among Democrat voters that Kamala has been told NOT to pick a Jew or the antisemites, particularly the Muslims, will get angry?

Except you haven't told us who said this exactly.

You think the Dems would be OK with a Republican being told not to put a black on the ticket because the Neo-Nazis would object? Hah. And that’s because any neo-Nazis are a small, fringe element among Republicans, while antisemites and their protectors are numerous, and are high elected or appointed Democrats.

Um, no. Here's the thing. A lot of liberal Jews look at the genocide in Gaza and say, "this is wrong."

 

[schmidlap]

/—-/ What’s false? Did Trump sign an EO to close the border? Didn’t Dementia Joe repeal Trump’s EO with his own EO? And didn’t Joe write his own EO last month?
So, what’s false about my post?

Border security, illegal immigration top of agenda at GOP convention:
‘Mass Deportation Now!’​

Mass deportation and reproductive freedom are sure to be major issues in the campaign.

 

[struth]

No, they made it legal to hire asylum seekers. This is nothing new. My wife has been working under this program since she claimed asylum in 2017.

It’s been legal.

What’s new is they stopped enforcing companies hiring illegals