Zone1 Hackers Unredact Epstein Files — What You Need To Know

[EvilCat Breath]

Oh, you did not read. It is statutory rape, like it said.

I was being a bit more esoteric.

An old statutory rape charge with a presently mature witness that is uncooperative will generally not be prosecuted.

 

[toobfreak]

who is talking about ******* england?.......and what i want done to them if they were molesting girls under 17?.....******* drop them in the middle of the pacific ocean.....laugh at that votto....

Sorry Harry, but you will never know the facts about Epstein. You will never know

1. How Epstein mysteriously killed himself while under 24/7 suicide watch when everything in place to protect him all failed at the same time.
2. Why Epstein apparently had it in for Trump, maybe because Trump didn't like what he was doing and didn't go along?
3. Who was ever really involved there and what they did to who because Epstein had worked for the CIA and many of the people he had there as guests are simply too close to the government or otherwise important to the government for our government to embarrass itself by exposing.

So get used to just guessing.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Oh no
Not another Pedocrat Conspiracy

 

[White 6]

I was being a bit more esoteric.

An old statutory rape charge with a presently mature witness that is uncooperative will generally not be prosecuted.

Which one of the victims did not want the Epstein files released?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

They weren't "hacked". You can just copy from the PDF, paste into a word processor like Notepad, and the redacted portion becomes visible.

It's a "hack" as in "a clever tip or technique for doing or improving something".

For all I know, the parties doing this or who originally did this & revealed their results could actually be hackers. That would not surprise me.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

the thing is,what will the powers that be do to the names on the list that actually had sex with girls under 17?...

Well on thing that they WON'T be able to do is continue to deny knowledge of the complaints made, and in some cases, who they were told were the parties involved.

Some of the documents that are police reports are entitled "Child pornography" so that means something and not the same something that Epstein was eventually convicted of.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

my question would be ....why do any redacting if it can be easily shown?...

I suspect that it never occurred to them to even think about anyone attempting to reverse the redaction process.

If it's important that your redaction process can not be reversed I think the following should work:
1, Open the image in an app that allows you to manipulate the COPY of the image such as MS Paint
2. Delete whatever you want removed by selecting the section of the image you don't want to display and then hit DELETE
3. Overlay the blank space(s) that you've removed with the black squares
4. (Optional) add redactions labels ([redacted])
5. Save the copy with the removed sensitive sections as "File Name - Redacted"
6. Print to .pdf

That way, even if someone were able to remove the black-out layer, there is nothing underneath to view

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

They redacted a mention of Hyperion Air. Why? Did they say?

Why 18?

Florida age of consent. Florida is where the perps had residences (Palm Beach)

 

[peacefan]

They weren't "hacked". You can just copy from the PDF, paste into a word processor like Notepad, and the redacted portion becomes visible.

that's a major breach of procedure. lack of procedure, even.

 

[JGalt]

that's a major breach of procedure. lack of procedure, even.

Shit happens.

 

[peacefan]

Shit happens.

doesn't mean you don't send in the cleaning crews when it hits the fan.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Which one of the victims did not want the Epstein files released?

The victims who wanted their names redacted didn’t want them released.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Sorry Harry, but you will never know the facts about Epstein. You will never know

1. How Epstein mysteriously killed himself while under 24/7 suicide watch when everything in place to protect him all failed at the same time.
2. Why Epstein apparently had it in for Trump, maybe because Trump didn't like what he was doing and didn't go along?
3. Who was ever really involved there and what they did to who because Epstein had worked for the CIA and many of the people he had there as guests are simply too close to the government or otherwise important to the government for our government to embarrass itself by exposing.

So get used to just guessing.

who is guessing?....i said if they are found out to be screwing girls under 17....

 

[toobfreak]

who is guessing?....i said if they are found out to be screwing girls under 17....

You likely will be. My point was that, find out or not, they will very likely never reveal all of their true findings to the general public.

 

[Dragonlady]

The sad part about all of this is the following

1. Those most interested in the Epstein files, and who are in a position to expose them, only want to use them to put away Trump. The problem is, pretty much all the pictures thus far has Bill Clinton in them, someone we all know will never be held to any account for anything.

2. Democrats nor Republicans want everyone involved held to account, because it would hurt them financially and politically because these are the uber rich fat cats around the world, thus none of it will ever be used to seek proper justice for any of them. In fact, Biden and the DNC sat on these files for how long? Keep in mind that they hate Trump with a passion, so why did they not pursue him with the Epstein files they had in their possession? Is it because TDS is all a ruse, and Trump is really one of them, or is it because they wanted to hide other bad actors that they value too much politically to expose those files? It is really an either or question.

3. The files exposed to the public would then be used to prosecute those people on social media, which would probably lead to more vigilantly justice Charlie Kirk style, or the health care CEO in New York as people no longer view the justice system as just, especially when it comes to the wealthy.

4. There is nothing that can be done to right the wrongs of what happened to those girls, or if there is, it would be few and far between. The 600 lb. gorilla in the room is, human trafficking today is at an all-time high around the world, yet no one makes a peep about doing anything about it. It is comparable to the DNC crying crocodile tears for slaves that lived 200 plus years ago in the US and pretending they can right those wrongs with reparations to their descendants. But the funniest part of all is, they don't even have to be descendants, all they have to do is have the same skin color as those slave descendants. Having said that, neither political party in the US seems to give a damn. Why is that? Meanwhile, at no other time in human history have there been more slaves in the world than there is now, but once again, there is no political movement out there who is attempting to address this.

None of Epstein's victims have named Clinton as an abuser.

Why are NONE of you clowns asking the victims who was abusing them? It's not like these women are all dead and can't speak for themselves.

 

[White 6]

The victims who wanted their names redacted didn’t want them released.

Who was that? Appears it wasn't any of the 13 victims, standing behind MJT, when she was speaking in support of them and having the files release. Are you getting ready to dox some rape victim?

 

[JGalt]

None of Epstein's victims have named Clinton as an abuser.

Why are NONE of you clowns asking the victims who was abusing them? It's not like these women are all dead and can't speak for themselves.

They'd be even deader if they testified against Pedo Bill.

Hillary would make sure of that.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Who was that? Appears it wasn't any of the 13 victims, standing behind MJT, when she was speaking in support of them and having the files release. Are you getting ready to dox some rape victim?

Someone was crying about not revealing the victims names.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Which one of the victims did not want the Epstein files released?

 

[Rogue AI]

the thing is,what will the powers that be do to the names on the list that actually had sex with girls under 17?...

That depends on a lot of things. Some of this goes back decades. Laws have changed, the overall opinion of such things has changed. Have statutes of limitations run out? If so, when? It is completely possible that the government is unable to do anything about it.