Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No Truth can ever come out of a Liars mouth for when they speak, they speak in The Language of Lies which is their Native Tongue and is The Language of The Father of Lies, Their Father, Satan.“How do you justify pushing for more gun control when you have an armed security detail that’s likely equipped with the same firearms and magazines that you seek to ban the common citizen from owning?” the man asked at a Monday evening Fox News town hall in Manassas, Virginia. “Does your life matter more than mine or my family’s or these peoples’?”
The audience applauded before Bloomberg’s answer.
Which was basically yes, Bloomberg feels his life is worth more than average Americans.
Audience Member Calls Out Bloomberg For Pushing Gun Control While Using Armed Guards: ‘Does Your Life Matter More Than Mine?’
The answer the sonofabitch gave was a blatant lie because all the gun control shit that he is proposing goes way beyond reasonable gun control that he says the Supreme Court supports.
All the Democrats are scumbags. Bloomberg is near the top the of that scumbag list.
nothing that i can tell. that's why i was asking. if his position is what he stated it's a pretty calm position that really doesn't go to either side or extreme.and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
What is wrong with that?
That isn't what he did as mayor of NY.
and that may well be. however, why are you opposed to my asking *what* his position really is? how hard is it to simply show what he has done in the past vs. having to lob out insults to others who are here to talk over issues?I'm saying his statement doesn't seem like a gun grabber. if he has past actions that make this statement a lie, just post em.Are you saying New York Gun laws don’t impact law abiding citizens?and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
Because. He. Is. Lying. You. Dense. Twit.
nothing that i can tell. that's why i was asking. if his position is what he stated it's a pretty calm position that really doesn't go to either side or extreme.and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
What is wrong with that?
That isn't what he did as mayor of NY.
if he didn't change policies in NYC, did he try? how hard would it be to change policies? rest assured i think bloomberg is a dumbass for various reasons (size of cokes you can buy for example) but i'm not going to just lemming along in hate if i honestly have zero idea on his own position on guns.
as mayor he can only change so much around gun laws. but in my effort to understand this, you get people like martybegan that seem to take it as a personal affront to their own intelligence.
a reasonable person, to me, doesn't make those assumptions and takes the time to go find out for themselves. so since you seem incapable of talking about the issue and instead insulting people, got no use for this part of the convo.nothing that i can tell. that's why i was asking. if his position is what he stated it's a pretty calm position that really doesn't go to either side or extreme.and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
What is wrong with that?
That isn't what he did as mayor of NY.
if he didn't change policies in NYC, did he try? how hard would it be to change policies? rest assured i think bloomberg is a dumbass for various reasons (size of cokes you can buy for example) but i'm not going to just lemming along in hate if i honestly have zero idea on his own position on guns.
as mayor he can only change so much around gun laws. but in my effort to understand this, you get people like martybegan that seem to take it as a personal affront to their own intelligence.
His position is guns for me and not for thee. A person who doesn't think people can handle their own diet soda consumption can be reasonably assumed to think people can't own guns responsibly.
a reasonable person, to me, doesn't make those assumptions and takes the time to go find out for themselves. so since you seem incapable of talking about the issue and instead insulting people, got no use for this part of the convo.nothing that i can tell. that's why i was asking. if his position is what he stated it's a pretty calm position that really doesn't go to either side or extreme.and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
What is wrong with that?
That isn't what he did as mayor of NY.
if he didn't change policies in NYC, did he try? how hard would it be to change policies? rest assured i think bloomberg is a dumbass for various reasons (size of cokes you can buy for example) but i'm not going to just lemming along in hate if i honestly have zero idea on his own position on guns.
as mayor he can only change so much around gun laws. but in my effort to understand this, you get people like martybegan that seem to take it as a personal affront to their own intelligence.
His position is guns for me and not for thee. A person who doesn't think people can handle their own diet soda consumption can be reasonably assumed to think people can't own guns responsibly.
have a day.
Just don’t get caught with a 32oz soda with a plastic straw.and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
What is troublesome about that?
He is too sane to be a democrat. Only socialists can win now... why have "less free shit", when you can have "ALL free shit"?
*this* is what i was looking for. information about his actions that would make his words a lie. thank you. given i'm sick and tired of bloomberg ads as it is, i'm not about to go look up things about him to add to my own misery.Just don’t get caught with a 32oz soda with a plastic straw.and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
What is troublesome about that?
He is too sane to be a democrat. Only socialists can win now... why have "less free shit", when you can have "ALL free shit"?
A Bloomberg presidency would be a dictatorship. That guy is a genuine asshole who preaches do as I say not as I do. He purchased millions in gun control ads in my state, all full of lies and distortions and conned the people of WA state into passing his gun control bill.
nothing that i can tell. that's why i was asking. if his position is what he stated it's a pretty calm position that really doesn't go to either side or extreme.and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
What is wrong with that?
That isn't what he did as mayor of NY.
if he didn't change policies in NYC, did he try? how hard would it be to change policies? rest assured i think bloomberg is a dumbass for various reasons (size of cokes you can buy for example) but i'm not going to just lemming along in hate if i honestly have zero idea on his own position on guns.
as mayor he can only change so much around gun laws. but in my effort to understand this, you get people like martybegan that seem to take it as a personal affront to their own intelligence.
there isn't much i like about bloomberg so i'm sure not defending him, but i am looking for specific actions that make what he said a lie and so far, a few of you have let me know his policies that do just that, so thank you.nothing that i can tell. that's why i was asking. if his position is what he stated it's a pretty calm position that really doesn't go to either side or extreme.and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
What is wrong with that?
That isn't what he did as mayor of NY.
if he didn't change policies in NYC, did he try? how hard would it be to change policies? rest assured i think bloomberg is a dumbass for various reasons (size of cokes you can buy for example) but i'm not going to just lemming along in hate if i honestly have zero idea on his own position on guns.
as mayor he can only change so much around gun laws. but in my effort to understand this, you get people like martybegan that seem to take it as a personal affront to their own intelligence.
Bloomberg can't pretend now to be the person he never was in the past. As far as the 2nd goes, he was violating those rights with his stop and frisk programs.
Where Michael Bloomberg Stands on the IssuesMikey wants to ban "assault weapons" and be able to sue gun manufacturers.
That isnt common sense. That is authoritarian.
nothing that i can tell. that's why i was asking. if his position is what he stated it's a pretty calm position that really doesn't go to either side or extreme.and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
What is wrong with that?
That isn't what he did as mayor of NY.
if he didn't change policies in NYC, did he try? how hard would it be to change policies? rest assured i think bloomberg is a dumbass for various reasons (size of cokes you can buy for example) but i'm not going to just lemming along in hate if i honestly have zero idea on his own position on guns.
as mayor he can only change so much around gun laws. but in my effort to understand this, you get people like martybegan that seem to take it as a personal affront to their own intelligence.
No buy back but banning certain ones is a problem.Where Michael Bloomberg Stands on the IssuesMikey wants to ban "assault weapons" and be able to sue gun manufacturers.
That isnt common sense. That is authoritarian.
seems he wants to ban "assault rifles" but doesn't support the notion to the degree the "social progressive" candidates do. he's spoken out against the buy backs as being stupid, unaffordable and politically counter productive.
Michael Bloomberg unveils sweeping gun control platform
According to his website, Bloomberg's plan consists of five pillars: strengthened background checks, the closing of loopholes such as the so-called boyfriend loophole that allows domestic abusers to buy guns if they aren't married to their victim, beefed-up regulations to keep guns away from children, increased funding for violence prevention programs and stronger regulation of the gun industry.
he does support the red flag laws and i've heard people on both sides speak out for this notion. it's *how* you do it that can be the issue. certainly if someone is in their front yard waving around AKs in their fruit of the looms and a 6 pack of schlitz under each armpit, it may apply. but i don't see much "radical" out of things i've read.
the counter is "these are merely steps to greater control" and maybe they are. maybe not. i do know people who say this tend to think that about *any* form of increasing regulation *at all* on guns. over protective or correct? who knows anymore.
i don't see a lot that hasn't been rehashed millions of times over already around this. typical old school thoughts and policies around them.
So, why is he even talking about gun control if that is his position?and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
Bloomberg was firearms around him 24/7 because he thinks his life is worth more than an ordinary citizenI'm saying his statement doesn't seem like a gun grabber. if he has past actions that make this statement a lie, just post em.Are you saying New York Gun laws don’t impact law abiding citizens?and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
yes, i do agree. but it's nothing new from the dem platform is what i am saying. not out to debate good vs. evil on his policies, just see if they're in fact any worse than what we already have from the left.No buy back but banning certain ones is a problem.Where Michael Bloomberg Stands on the IssuesMikey wants to ban "assault weapons" and be able to sue gun manufacturers.
That isnt common sense. That is authoritarian.
seems he wants to ban "assault rifles" but doesn't support the notion to the degree the "social progressive" candidates do. he's spoken out against the buy backs as being stupid, unaffordable and politically counter productive.
Michael Bloomberg unveils sweeping gun control platform
According to his website, Bloomberg's plan consists of five pillars: strengthened background checks, the closing of loopholes such as the so-called boyfriend loophole that allows domestic abusers to buy guns if they aren't married to their victim, beefed-up regulations to keep guns away from children, increased funding for violence prevention programs and stronger regulation of the gun industry.
he does support the red flag laws and i've heard people on both sides speak out for this notion. it's *how* you do it that can be the issue. certainly if someone is in their front yard waving around AKs in their fruit of the looms and a 6 pack of schlitz under each armpit, it may apply. but i don't see much "radical" out of things i've read.
the counter is "these are merely steps to greater control" and maybe they are. maybe not. i do know people who say this tend to think that about *any* form of increasing regulation *at all* on guns. over protective or correct? who knows anymore.
i don't see a lot that hasn't been rehashed millions of times over already around this. typical old school thoughts and policies around them.
Red flag laws are a problem.
Any gun control measure is a problem. All you have to do is amend the constitution.
dunno. if his position is nothing unusual for the left, why is it even an issue at all?So, why is he even talking about gun control if that is his position?and bloomberg used this opportunity to state his position on guns:
“Let me talk about firearms for a second,” he continued. “The Second Amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Nobody suggests that we’re gonna change the Constitution, even if you wanted to I don’t think you’d get it done, so nobody’s gonna take your right to bear arms. The Supreme Court said you can have reasonable restrictions. The only restrictions which I’m in favor of is to prevent us from selling guns to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people that are minors.”
-----
what is so earth shattering about this? who exactly is he trying to take them away from; other than criminals, people with mental problems and minors?
We already have laws against selling guns to the mentally ill, criminals and minors.
