Like this loon who wants to tell kids all about his detailed sex life all day like they are his adult friends to talk to.
or
this loon
Or how about some nice porn books for children
View attachment 635902
But I'm going to discuss the people you've shown, if they have anything that shows who they are.
1) Allyn Walker.
Old Dominion University revealed in a statement Wednesday that Allyn Walker will be stepping down as an assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice.
nypost.com
"Walker insisted it it was important to
use the term “minor-attracted persons” instead of “pedophile” because it’s less stigmatizing."
This is all about controlling narratives. For a bunch of people who complain about shutting others up, this is a clear case of this.
The guy merely said the term is stigmatizing. Which to an extent it is.
Pedophilia is when someone is attracted to pre-pubescent children. It doesn't mean they've acted on this desire. I wouldn't know how many pedophiles have never harmed children at all, I doubt there are statistics for it.
It's like saying because someone's attracted to women they will rape people.
The narrative of trying to keep the term pedophile is pretty clear. They like the word having stigma.
Now, the debate (in a free society with freedom of speech) would be whether the term should have stigma or not. I'd guess most people would would say yes, it should have stigma and I'm not going to say they're wrong. HOWEVER what this guy said isn't necessary worth losing a job over, nor is it anything for you to come on here and claim some kind of kiddy fiddling conspiracy.
The second one, about school teachers wanting to talk about gay parents.
I'm going to turn it around.
When a woman is pregnant, it means she's FUCKED. It means some guy put a dick up her vagina and fucked until the sperm came out. Should we ban all talk about pregnant women? Lock them up until they've given birth to not "hyper sexualize our children"?
Should we ban talk of mommy and daddy, because clearly mommy and daddy were *******. Dick, vagina problem again.
The reality is that this is, again, a narrative trying to attack gay people. It's religious in nature. Children don't really have much problem dealing with mommy being pregnant again. They don't really need to know that daddy had her knickers down on the dining room table and was thrusting for five minutes straight. So why would kids have a problem with two men or two women? The reality is they wouldn't.
The third one about a kid dressing up in girls' clothing. This is just ridiculous. Kids don't really have any preconceived ideas about what is what. Long hair for kids is hair until the point where adults have put their preconceptions on the kids that "Long hair is for girls". Or that skirts are for girls (what about kilts?)
I've worked in schools and I've worked around gay kids. I've worked around small children and I know that identity is something that kids don't really give a damn about. Some kids are very masculine, some very feminine, others in the middle, regardless of gender.
What you're saying is that a kid who feels that he prefers going against conservative norms should be kept in the quiet, as if, if we don't talk about it, they'll stop thinking about it.
The very same reason why STDs are higher in conservative places that simply don't talk about things other than abstinence.
The drag queen thing seems to hinge on profanity and the appropriateness of the song.
