Great move by President Biden stopping Trump from appointing a bunch of radical judges!

[Astrostar]

Opinion | The partisan gamesmanship over who gets to appoint judges is hardly new

After last month’s presidential election, a number of judges who had announced their intent to retire when a successor was chosen withdrew their decisions.

www.msnbc.com

Remember when McConnell stopped President Obama from appointing Garland to the SCOTUS? Payback's hell ain't it. With President Biden's veto of the "More Judges" bill, Trump will not be able to appoint a bunch of gun loving, canal takeover, Greenland buying, Canada annexing judges to do his bidding.

Bigly!!!

 

[whitehall]

Which administration is more corrupt when they talk aging judges into changing their minds about retiring for political reasons? Maybe The senile old fool will pick one of his commuted killers to be a judge.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Opinion | The partisan gamesmanship over who gets to appoint judges is hardly new

After last month’s presidential election, a number of judges who had announced their intent to retire when a successor was chosen withdrew their decisions.

www.msnbc.com

Remember when McConnell stopped President Obama from appointing Garland to the SCOTUS? Payback's hell ain't it. With President Biden's veto of the "More Judges" bill, Trump will not be able to appoint a bunch of gun loving, canal takeover, Greenland buying, Canada annexing judges to do his bidding.

Bigly!!!

Far too many of Trump's judicial appointments have been both corrupt and incompetent.

 

[Maxdeath]

I do not care for either the democrat cult or the republican cult.
I see too much of the hypocrisy on both sides.
But celebrating one cult picking judges over the other being denied is about as stupid as the cults get.

 

[Calypso Jones]

Opinion | The partisan gamesmanship over who gets to appoint judges is hardly new

After last month’s presidential election, a number of judges who had announced their intent to retire when a successor was chosen withdrew their decisions.

www.msnbc.com

Remember when McConnell stopped President Obama from appointing Garland to the SCOTUS? Payback's hell ain't it. With President Biden's veto of the "More Judges" bill, Trump will not be able to appoint a bunch of gun loving, canal takeover, Greenland buying, Canada annexing judges to do his bidding.

Bigly!!!

you've seen the absolute open bias of Garland and you think he'd have been a good pick for the SC?? Is President Biden going to put in more freaks and pervs into these positions to deny Trump putting in NORMAL people? I don't think you really have a leg to stand on considering the appointees of Biden. Well..in biden's name because we know now that Joe was never the acting president even before day 1.

You probably haven't learned this life lesson yet but eventually, your choices for these positions will get around to infringing your rights at some point.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Democrats want a government of tyranny.
That is why they want to pack the Supreme Court and abolish the Electoral College.
That is why they loath the constitution that protects the citizens from tyranny.

 

[The Duke]

you've seen the absolute open bias of Garland and you think he'd have been a good pick for the SC?? Is President Biden going to put in more freaks and pervs into these positions to deny Trump putting in NORMAL people? I don't think you really have a leg to stand on considering the appointees of Biden. Well..in biden's name because we know now that Joe was never the acting president even before day 1.

You probably haven't learned this life lesson yet but eventually, your choices for these positions will get around to infringing your rights at some point.

Trump can fire them all on day 1 just like Clinton and Obama did. In fact, I bet it's Obama doing this.

 

[Auld Phart]

Opinion | The partisan gamesmanship over who gets to appoint judges is hardly new

After last month’s presidential election, a number of judges who had announced their intent to retire when a successor was chosen withdrew their decisions.

www.msnbc.com

Remember when McConnell stopped President Obama from appointing Garland to the SCOTUS? Payback's hell ain't it. With President Biden's veto of the "More Judges" bill, Trump will not be able to appoint a bunch of gun loving, canal takeover, Greenland buying, Canada annexing judges to do his bidding.

Bigly!!!

Republican House can write/pass a new one, Senate can approve and send it on to Trump.

What did he gain by his veto?

a short lived 'GOTCHA' moment?

 

[Blaster]

Only liberal judges are radical.

 

[The Duke]

Here's a fact, Demotards: There is zero confidence in anything done during The Biden Administration.
From the election to every policy and everything, and Americans are very angry.

 

[Thunk]

The judges Trump appoints KNOW what a woman is

 

[The Duke]

Republican House can write/pass a new one, Senate can approve and send it on to Trump.

What did he gain by his veto?

a short lived 'GOTCHA' moment?

Hopefully Obama's last misuse of power.

 

[1srelluc]

So leftist judges are liars......Do tell, why the next thing you know the OP will be starting a thread on how water is wet.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Opinion | The partisan gamesmanship over who gets to appoint judges is hardly new

After last month’s presidential election, a number of judges who had announced their intent to retire when a successor was chosen withdrew their decisions.

www.msnbc.com

Remember when McConnell stopped President Obama from appointing Garland to the SCOTUS? Payback's hell ain't it. With President Biden's veto of the "More Judges" bill, Trump will not be able to appoint a bunch of gun loving, canal takeover, Greenland buying, Canada annexing judges to do his bidding.

Bigly!!!

So you prefer your corrupt judges to the corrupt judges from the other party. Got it.

 

[TimFitz]

The Democrats want a government of tyranny.
That is why they want to pack the Supreme Court and abolish the Electoral College.
That is why they loath the constitution that protects the citizens from tyranny.

View attachment 1058162

No, that’s what Trump says he wants.

no one who believes in a government of laws believes in personal political retribution. Much less assemble enemies list and nominate a lickspittle hatchet man to carry it out.

But you voted for just that.

 

[TimFitz]

Republican House can write/pass a new one, Senate can approve and send it on to Trump.

What did he gain by his veto?

a short lived 'GOTCHA' moment?

The House might pass it.

It won’t go anywhere in the Senate.

 

[scruffy]

Trump isn't in office yet.

 

[Silent Warrior]

No, that’s what Trump says he wants.

no one who believes in a government of laws believes in personal political retribution. Much less assemble enemies list and nominate a lickspittle hatchet man to carry it out.

But you voted for just that.

We just spent 4 years watching political retribution by the current administration. What would be so different with the other side doing it now? This will lead to the USA becoming a third world country as those on the left seem to want it to be. It seems to be a win win for them.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

No, that’s what Trump says he wants.

no one who believes in a government of laws believes in personal political retribution. Much less assemble enemies list and nominate a lickspittle hatchet man to carry it out.

But you voted for just that.

well, we can't expect the people who are inside the crazy democrat cult to be able to understand the tyrannical nature of the democrat party

 

[john doe 101]

The Democrats want a government of tyranny.
That is why they want to pack the Supreme Court and abolish the Electoral College.
That is why they loath the constitution that protects the citizens from tyranny.

View attachment 1058162

Just shut the fuck up w that nonsense, traitor.