"Gosh, I just DON'T UNDERSTAND why ANYONE would VOTE for her"

Gosh, I just DON'T UNDERSTAND why ANYONE would VOTE for someone who has committed SERIOUS FELONIES involving NATIONAL SECURITY.
I sure am hearing this quite a bit from the talk radio hosts and their listeners. People appear to be sincerely flummoxed, absolutely and truly clueless, why anyone could vote for Clinton.

Not sure why this needs to be such a mystery. Maybe it isn't. Maybe they're just pretending not to know. I can't tell at this point, anyway. But I'll try to explain.

First, most of her more honest voters (they're out there) will admit she's not very appealing (pick your reasons, there are many potentials) and that they're not terribly excited about her. I'd guess many of them, if not most, would rather have someone else on the ticket. However...

Second, maybe they agree with her on the issues more than they agree with Trump. Issues are pretty important, y'know? In fact, a candidate's stand on the issues is usually the driving force behind voting for them, is it not? And yes, they are different on the issues. Have we forgotten that?

And third, and this is the one that seems to go right over the head of many, there are a lot of people who are horrified by Trump. And, just as with Hillary, there are plenty of reasons from which to choose -- if you're honest. And please don't pretend you can't imagine what they're talking about. In other words: HE. IS. EVEN. WORSE.

Well, there ya go. Two clear reasons. You certainly don't have to agree - I know you won't - but at least you can no longer say you don't understand.

Yer welcome!
.


What were the issues?
You really can't think of issues on which they disagree?

Taxation, gay rights, abortion, minimum wage, foreign affairs, trade, role of government, any of that?

Really?
.
 
Last edited:
I sure am hearing this quite a bit from the talk radio hosts and their listeners. People appear to be sincerely flummoxed, absolutely and truly clueless, why anyone could vote for Clinton.

Not sure why this needs to be such a mystery. Maybe it isn't. Maybe they're just pretending not to know. I can't tell at this point, anyway. But I'll try to explain.

First, most of her more honest voters (they're out there) will admit she's not very appealing (pick your reasons, there are many potentials) and that they're not terribly excited about her. I'd guess many of them, if not most, would rather have someone else on the ticket. However...

Second, maybe they agree with her on the issues more than they agree with Trump. Issues are pretty important, y'know? In fact, a candidate's stand on the issues is usually the driving force behind voting for them, is it not? And yes, they are different on the issues. Have we forgotten that?

And third, and this is the one that seems to go right over the head of many, there are a lot of people who are horrified by Trump. And, just as with Hillary, there are plenty of reasons from which to choose -- if you're honest. And please don't pretend you can't imagine what they're talking about. In other words: HE. IS. EVEN. WORSE.

Well, there ya go. Two clear reasons. You certainly don't have to agree - I know you won't - but at least you can no longer say you don't understand.

Yer welcome!
.
Stop trying to reassure yourself that voting for that corrupt liar is OK because it isn't.
Hey, just trying to help with the confusion.
.
 
Hillary deserved a better opponent.

The DNC deserved a better nominee. But, none of the spineless jellyfish were willing to step up to the plate except Bernie and that other dude. So, she should be exactly where she's at right now, and yes -- she did deserve a better opponent, however, consider this:

If Hillary wins, that is evidence that she is a legitimate badass and deserves to be president exactly because Trump has been such a difficult opponent. This is a chance for a woman to beat a man, and that would speak volumes about her and how America feels about her. This has been the biggest challenge she's ever faced in her entire life -- and it's looking like she's gonna win.

Not sure about any of that….

What I am sure about is history. Only Harry Truman and GHWB were able to convince Americans to keep the oval in their party’s hands after 8 years (or 8+ years) of stewardship. Hillary isn’t supposed to be within shouting distance of winning. Yet she is. Volumes have been spoken already IMHO.

Not sure about what part?

The DNC has the best qualified nominee since GHWB in 1988.
“A chance for a woman to beat a man” is silly. Gender has nothing to do with this election outside the treatment of the gender by the GOP nominee and the lifelong commitment of protecting the rights (based partly on gender) of the DNC nominee.
 
Gosh, I just DON'T UNDERSTAND why ANYONE would VOTE for someone who has committed SERIOUS FELONIES involving NATIONAL SECURITY.

Dear jwoodie because people are innocent until proven guilty.
These ppl depend on govt to determine what of those accusations is true or not.

People who don't depend on govt, and who accept responsibility, would refrain.
And say until it's proven there is no criminal abuse or conflict of interest,
it isn't safe to elect someone where other countries could already have
enough dirt to exploit that person for foreign interests.

The people who rely on media and govt and party, don't think that way.
And they assume media and govt and party who told them that nothing wrong happened
will be responsible otherwise, not them. They don't accept responsibility for that.
They vote for leaders and expect the leaders and govt to take all the responsibility for them.

Dear Emily,

I didn't say convicted, did I? I said that she committed serious felonies,such as destroying subpoenaed evidence to obstruct justice and avoid criminal prosecution. Do you seriously dispute that she intentionally destroyed such evidence on her emails? And if you are so concerned with judicial process, don't you think a grand jury should have been convened to determine whether these actions constitute criminal conduct?
 
I sure am hearing this quite a bit from the talk radio hosts and their listeners. People appear to be sincerely flummoxed, absolutely and truly clueless, why anyone could vote for Clinton.

Not sure why this needs to be such a mystery. Maybe it isn't. Maybe they're just pretending not to know. I can't tell at this point, anyway. But I'll try to explain.

First, most of her more honest voters (they're out there) will admit she's not very appealing (pick your reasons, there are many potentials) and that they're not terribly excited about her. I'd guess many of them, if not most, would rather have someone else on the ticket. However...

Second, maybe they agree with her on the issues more than they agree with Trump. Issues are pretty important, y'know? In fact, a candidate's stand on the issues is usually the driving force behind voting for them, is it not? And yes, they are different on the issues. Have we forgotten that?

And third, and this is the one that seems to go right over the head of many, there are a lot of people who are horrified by Trump. And, just as with Hillary, there are plenty of reasons from which to choose -- if you're honest. And please don't pretend you can't imagine what they're talking about. In other words: HE. IS. EVEN. WORSE.

Well, there ya go. Two clear reasons. You certainly don't have to agree - I know you won't - but at least you can no longer say you don't understand.

Yer welcome!
.

You spoke a lot but said nothing.


Let me break this down for you. Issues and policy were important from the get go. First, most of her most honest voters (Good luck!) will tell you they did not give a dang about policy or issues and haven't really in 8 years unless the media told them to pick it up and pretend to be activists. They can't identify anyone's policy if it wasn't a sound bite presented by someone else. Not only could they not identify Sanders' policy they started calling people communists. They began to defend, without even realizing it, policies and people they would never have before. They can recognize it and enjoy pointing it out when it is somebody not on their "team" but had no idea they were pulling the same exact shit.

And she has a track record.

Four days left and it's all about the issues? I don't think so. They have willingly jacked things up for the next four years and then some.
Of course they can identify the issues on which they agree with her.

And they, along with people even in Trump's own party, think he's an embarrassing buffoon. That's their opinion.

And those are the two primary reason they're putting up with her faults.

Why this is a mystery is a mystery.
.
 
I sure am hearing this quite a bit from the talk radio hosts and their listeners. People appear to be sincerely flummoxed, absolutely and truly clueless, why anyone could vote for Clinton.

Not sure why this needs to be such a mystery. Maybe it isn't. Maybe they're just pretending not to know. I can't tell at this point, anyway. But I'll try to explain.

First, most of her more honest voters (they're out there) will admit she's not very appealing (pick your reasons, there are many potentials) and that they're not terribly excited about her. I'd guess many of them, if not most, would rather have someone else on the ticket. However...

Second, maybe they agree with her on the issues more than they agree with Trump. Issues are pretty important, y'know? In fact, a candidate's stand on the issues is usually the driving force behind voting for them, is it not? And yes, they are different on the issues. Have we forgotten that?

And third, and this is the one that seems to go right over the head of many, there are a lot of people who are horrified by Trump. And, just as with Hillary, there are plenty of reasons from which to choose -- if you're honest. And please don't pretend you can't imagine what they're talking about. In other words: HE. IS. EVEN. WORSE.

Well, there ya go. Two clear reasons. You certainly don't have to agree - I know you won't - but at least you can no longer say you don't understand.

Yer welcome!
.

You spoke a lot but said nothing.


Let me break this down for you. Issues and policy were important from the get go. First, most of her most honest voters (Good luck!) will tell you they did not give a dang about policy or issues and haven't really in 8 years unless the media told them to pick it up and pretend to be activists. They can't identify anyone's policy if it wasn't a sound bite presented by someone else. Not only could they not identify Sanders' policy they started calling people communists. They began to defend, without even realizing it, policies and people they would never have before. They can recognize it and enjoy pointing it out when it is somebody not on their "team" but had no idea they were pulling the same exact shit.

And she has a track record.

Four days left and it's all about the issues? I don't think so. They have willingly jacked things up for the next four years and then some.
Of course they can identify the issues on which they agree with her.

And they, along with people even in Trump's own party, think he's an embarrassing buffoon. That's their opinion.

And those are the two primary reason they're putting up with her faults.

Why this is a mystery is a mystery.
.

It was never a mystery. It's party before anything else and to the extent that there is not even any critical thinking going on.
 
Hillary deserved a better opponent.

The DNC deserved a better nominee. But, none of the spineless jellyfish were willing to step up to the plate except Bernie and that other dude. So, she should be exactly where she's at right now, and yes -- she did deserve a better opponent, however, consider this:

If Hillary wins, that is evidence that she is a legitimate badass and deserves to be president exactly because Trump has been such a difficult opponent. This is a chance for a woman to beat a man, and that would speak volumes about her and how America feels about her. This has been the biggest challenge she's ever faced in her entire life -- and it's looking like she's gonna win.

Not sure about any of that….

What I am sure about is history. Only Harry Truman and GHWB were able to convince Americans to keep the oval in their party’s hands after 8 years (or 8+ years) of stewardship. Hillary isn’t supposed to be within shouting distance of winning. Yet she is. Volumes have been spoken already IMHO.

Not sure about what part?

The DNC has the best qualified nominee since GHWB in 1988.
“A chance for a woman to beat a man” is silly. Gender has nothing to do with this election outside the treatment of the gender by the GOP nominee and the lifelong commitment of protecting the rights (based partly on gender) of the DNC nominee.

Ah. I didn't phrase that right, but you have to admit that it will be incredible for a woman to beat a man....especially a guy like Trump. Talk about sweet victory. Sheesh.

I go back and forth on the "best qualified" part. I was a Bernie voter. I think it's interesting how Bernie was able to resonate on such a deep level with so many people, yet Hillary has had a hell of a time resonating on that level -- despite her "qualifications." Eh, I'm just glad that Bernie brought her to the left on many issues. If it wasn't for Bernie, she'd still be a slight right of center democrat as she never expressed any of those positions prior to Bernie. That is still a concern, but I'll take what I can get.
 
Hillary deserved a better opponent.

The DNC deserved a better nominee. But, none of the spineless jellyfish were willing to step up to the plate except Bernie and that other dude. So, she should be exactly where she's at right now, and yes -- she did deserve a better opponent, however, consider this:

If Hillary wins, that is evidence that she is a legitimate badass and deserves to be president exactly because Trump has been such a difficult opponent. This is a chance for a woman to beat a man, and that would speak volumes about her and how America feels about her. This has been the biggest challenge she's ever faced in her entire life -- and it's looking like she's gonna win.
how does that speak volumes of her?...she is not well liked,people apparently,dislike trump more than her...just because she wins does not mean she will be automatically liked...
 
Hillary deserved a better opponent.

The DNC deserved a better nominee. But, none of the spineless jellyfish were willing to step up to the plate except Bernie and that other dude. So, she should be exactly where she's at right now, and yes -- she did deserve a better opponent, however, consider this:

If Hillary wins, that is evidence that she is a legitimate badass and deserves to be president exactly because Trump has been such a difficult opponent. This is a chance for a woman to beat a man, and that would speak volumes about her and how America feels about her. This has been the biggest challenge she's ever faced in her entire life -- and it's looking like she's gonna win.
how does that speak volumes of her?...she is not well liked,people apparently,dislike trump more than her...just because she wins does not mean she will be automatically liked...

I agree. If she wins despite not being well liked -- that does speak volumes about how Americans think of her. They're voting for her because they have faith in her ability to lead, not because they like her and want to have her over for dinner.
 
Hillary deserved a better opponent.
People like you completely blow my fucking mind

People like you needn’t wonder about why the lost….the answer is in the mirror and calling a woman a “slimy ass bitch”.


... unless, of course, it is an accurate description.

As for the mirror ---- I note that you are quick to turn it towards others, and loathe to examine yourself in it.
 
I sure am hearing this quite a bit from the talk radio hosts and their listeners. People appear to be sincerely flummoxed, absolutely and truly clueless, why anyone could vote for Clinton.

Not sure why this needs to be such a mystery. Maybe it isn't. Maybe they're just pretending not to know. I can't tell at this point, anyway. But I'll try to explain.

First, most of her more honest voters (they're out there) will admit she's not very appealing (pick your reasons, there are many potentials) and that they're not terribly excited about her. I'd guess many of them, if not most, would rather have someone else on the ticket. However...

Second, maybe they agree with her on the issues more than they agree with Trump. Issues are pretty important, y'know? In fact, a candidate's stand on the issues is usually the driving force behind voting for them, is it not? And yes, they are different on the issues. Have we forgotten that?

And third, and this is the one that seems to go right over the head of many, there are a lot of people who are horrified by Trump. And, just as with Hillary, there are plenty of reasons from which to choose -- if you're honest. And please don't pretend you can't imagine what they're talking about. In other words: HE. IS. EVEN. WORSE.

Well, there ya go. Two clear reasons. You certainly don't have to agree - I know you won't - but at least you can no longer say you don't understand.

Yer welcome!
.
Stop trying to reassure yourself that voting for that corrupt liar is OK because it isn't.
Hey, just trying to help with the confusion.
.
There is no confusion. This is a reassurance thread plain & simple
 
Hillary deserved a better opponent.
People like you completely blow my fucking mind

People like you needn’t wonder about why the lost….the answer is in the mirror and calling a woman a “slimy ass bitch”.


... unless, of course, it is an accurate description.


As for the mirror ---- I note that you are quick to turn it towards others, and loathe to examine yourself in it.
She's a skank.
Her avatar before the skank she has now was another sorry lib skank.

Sandra Fluke.
sandra-fluke-01.jpg


This skank loves to model herself after other skanks.
 
Last edited:
I sure am hearing this quite a bit from the talk radio hosts and their listeners. People appear to be sincerely flummoxed, absolutely and truly clueless, why anyone could vote for Clinton.

Not sure why this needs to be such a mystery. Maybe it isn't. Maybe they're just pretending not to know. I can't tell at this point, anyway. But I'll try to explain.

First, most of her more honest voters (they're out there) will admit she's not very appealing (pick your reasons, there are many potentials) and that they're not terribly excited about her. I'd guess many of them, if not most, would rather have someone else on the ticket. However...

Second, maybe they agree with her on the issues more than they agree with Trump. Issues are pretty important, y'know? In fact, a candidate's stand on the issues is usually the driving force behind voting for them, is it not? And yes, they are different on the issues. Have we forgotten that?

And third, and this is the one that seems to go right over the head of many, there are a lot of people who are horrified by Trump. And, just as with Hillary, there are plenty of reasons from which to choose -- if you're honest. And please don't pretend you can't imagine what they're talking about. In other words: HE. IS. EVEN. WORSE.

Well, there ya go. Two clear reasons. You certainly don't have to agree - I know you won't - but at least you can no longer say you don't understand.

Yer welcome!
.
Stop trying to reassure yourself that voting for that corrupt liar is OK because it isn't.
Hey, just trying to help with the confusion.
.
There is no confusion. This is a reassurance thread plain & simple
Sure there is. I heard a couple of Hannity callers today saying it simply did not make any sense to them.

Find talk show host Mike Gallagher on your radio Monday. He keeps saying that he's in absolute shock that anyone would consider voting for her.

Or maybe they're just lying, huh? They sure SEEM sincere.
.
 

Forum List

Back
Top