GOP National Leadership In Retreat: "Black Lives Matter!(?)" (Apparently Not In The Pandemic(?), Either!)

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
Anyone can guess that I myself rarely watch Fox-Fabricated Newscasts. For one thing, the usual liberal Los Angeles newscasts would be said to be all white people, as usual. The comments were centered less on social arithmetic and economic oppression than on the deplorable lack of physical distancing and facemasks in the crowd. Two black police, in Atlanta, were arrested for some nature of aggression against white women, college students: Even(?). Old Times there are not Forgotten. Any new gallows is likely under construction, already! Senator Cotton seems to be recommending aerial strafing, even: "One White Nation. . . .On The Attack!" So what there was is better described, "Little Boutique, Full of White Sheep!)"

Worse, and not so much mentioned--actually at all: Is the deplorable lack of Federal Administration Pandemic Response. Local officials were put in charge, not generally regarded well-intentioned, or statistically up on much more than political partisan data. Politics is local, and impacts administration. "Safer at Home" could itself be easily described the actual source of anger and frustration of the black people in the streets. Long Beach, CA, was visibly impacted with black demonstrators. Beverly Hills and Santa Monica were better said impacted with even well-armed cadres--right or left, and generally light-skinned. They had canisters of stuff.


Public Health generally was clearly entirely unaware of the housing characteristics of the lower income wards. "Wards" is more likely all they knew how to count. So what they were recommending was likely less engaged of sociology, and more of counting votes. In lower income wards, physical distancing was not an option, and facemasks were easily said nowhere available. 25% of U.S. households live in shared housing, multitudes to a room.

To punctuate and emphasize: Many protesters did in fact seem to have the facemasks--maybe coming off their shifts, even(?)! Anyone might guess they were entirely aware of the wards--at LA County General Hospitals(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut. 23: 19-20: "Most Lives Do Not Matter!")
 
Last edited:
The GOP has nothing to do with the riots and looting. The democrat mayors and governors allowed it to happen. So when people and businesses move out because there is no "law and order" its the democrat voters who are to blame. In Miami and other Republican mayoral cities there was no major rioting or looting. Who do you support, the police or the looters?
 
Anyone can guess that I myself rarely watch Fox-Fabricated Newscasts. For one thing, the usual liberal Los Angeles newscasts would be said to be all white people, as usual. The comments were centered less on social arithmetic and economic oppression than on the deplorable lack of physical distancing and facemasks in the crowd. Two black police, in Atlanta, were arrested for some nature of aggression against white women, college students: Even(?). Old Times there are not Forgotten. Any new gallows is likely under construction, already! Senator Cotton seems to be recommending aerial strafing, even: "One White Nation. . . .On The Attack!" So what there was is better described, "Little Boutique, Full of White Sheep!)"

Worse, and not so much mentioned--actually at all: Is the deplorable lack of Federal Administration Pandemic Response. Local officials were put in charge, not generally regarded well-intentioned, or statistically up on much more than political partisan data. Politics is local, and impacts administration. "Safer at Home" could itself be easily described the actual source of anger and frustration of the black people in the streets. Long Beach, CA, was visibly impacted with black demonstrators. Beverly Hills and Santa Monica were better said impacted with even well-armed cadres--right or left, and generally light-skinned. They had canisters of stuff.


Public Health generally was clearly entirely unaware of the housing characteristics of the lower income wards. "Wards" is more likely all they knew how to count. So what they were recommending was likely less engaged of sociology, and more of counting votes. In lower income wards, physical distancing was not an option, and facemasks were easily said nowhere available. 25% of U.S. households live in shared housing, multitudes to a room.

To punctuate and emphasize: Many protesters did in fact seem to have the facemasks--maybe coming off their shifts, even(?)! Anyone might guess they were entirely aware of the wards--at LA County General Hospitals(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut. 23: 19-20: "Most Lives Do Not Matter!")
You're such a crybaby. What have you done to better the world over the past 60 days?
 
As I recall the goddamned left said Trump did not have the authority to tell the governors what to do in the COVID crisis! Why are ewe fucking lying about it now?
 
Mostly people were wondering if Gov. Cuomo was running for the Democratic Nomination for US President, actually. The Democrats even have a relief bill, passed in the House--stalled in the Senate. "Trumps budgets have proposed cuts to public health, only to be overruled by Congress. . ." is how Associated Press recalls it. The Republican response looks more like this, Washington Post:
___________________________________
":Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) is calling for the use of the military — including an Army division that specializes in air assault operations — to quell the violent protests that have erupted in cities across the country.
Cotton, often mentioned as a potential 2024 Republican presidential candidate, made his push in tweets and on morning television, arguing that “anarchy, rioting, and looting needs to end tonight.”
“If local law enforcement is overwhelmed and needs backup, let's see how tough these Antifa terrorists are when they're facing off with the 101st Airborne Division,” Cotton said in one tweet, referencing the Army division nicknamed the “Screaming Eagles.”
In a subsequent tweet, the senator listed other military units that he said could be deployed, saying he favors “whatever it takes to restore order.”
“No quarter for insurrectionists, anarchists, rioters, and looters,” he wrote.'
______________________________________

People can now recall the Stimulus relief payments: Spending Friendly originates through the more modern economic paradigm offered through a story of Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, called all over, "O'Christ(?)!" Matthew 20:1-16, offers equal-amount payments regardless if the laborers were taxable for the year or not(?). (See Genesis One: Biblical Days are weird!). That can be shown to be like a Euclidean rectangle with lines of little dots from the left side to the right. A diagonal can be drawn in, from the lower left to the upper right. That would be a usury-based, fixed percentage pay raise. The rich get more, all lower incomes successively less. Responding to Karl Marx Manifesto--Lincoln may have known him, in City of New York--US Federal Reserve was created in 1913--Centralized Credit, but complete with usury--also unbeknownst to Karl Marx.

So anyone notes that the little money-dots in the box have an origin in the Total Credit Market--now at about $85.0 tril., give or take(?). Bolstering that is the "Fiat Money." Banks make loans and businesses are subject to usual accounting rules. The federal government can create more credit--finance itself--and Federal Reserve can buy soured mortgages--and other credit--from the troubled banks.

The newer arithmetic is how any people's get through the Pandemic. Note that it is spending friendly. All lives matter in the market place: Despite what all the yelling and hollering seem to make it look like. "Heeere Pig! Pig! Pig! Heeere, Pig!" The Old Wrong Ways have already started to come to an end, forever!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-20 is really all about mainly gouging and screwing one another, Just Sayin"!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top