Goodbye Sessions lol. How far does this go?

[Slade3200]

The thing is, it doesn't matter what it appears he talked to them about. He said he hadn't talked to the Russians, when if it was innocent conversations all he had to do was explain himself. Him lying, then backing up his lies by saying the reports are lies, just tells me his meetings were not innocent ones.

. He didn't talk to them in the context for which the Democrat head hunters are hoping for. It's all about the context of the conversations as pertaining to the accusations or investigation in which is accusing someone of something. Now if what they are accusing sessions of, wasn't the context of his contact with Russian officials, then he didn't lie by saying he didn't speak to the Russians while thinking about the context in which the question was being asked of him. Nothing to see here folks.

They did not ask him if he talked to the Russians about meddling in the elections. They just asked him if he, as a member of Trump's campaign, had talked to the Russians. He had talked to the Russians while he was a member of the Trump campaign, yet he said no. It's pretty cut and dry. If he didn't talk to the Ambassador of Russia about Trump's campaign, all he had to have done was say that he had talked to the Russians, but that it had nothing to do with Trump. Sessions as a lawyer and a judge, would know this very clearly... that his answers are indeed a lie, despite how some want to read into them. His types of answers is the same type of answers that get regular citizens thrown in jail with a guilty verdict in a court of law.

Do you have an exact quote of what that buffoon Al Franken asked Sessions?

Go to page one and watch for yourself. I posted a video. Or go to YouTube and search for sessions Russia

 

[Slade3200]

They have accused the Russians of hacking the election, and therefore robbing Hillary's chances of winning in which was a lie. This made the Russians toxic to anyone talking to them in the regular context of normal business, and if anyone so much as communicated with them, then they must be guilty of something or even guilty of a crime. If Obama accused the Russians of something they didnot do (hack or influence) the election, and has caused all of this trouble, then he should be brought up on charges. The Demon-crats used the word INFLUENCE because they know that such a word would be broad in scope, and in interpretation.. They (the Dem accusers for political purposes), figure by way of such a word that it would be impossible for them to be accused of a crime by way of this word used if it all backfired on them. They are carefully choosing such words in so that they can get away with what they are up to, and yet escape justice if their game is figured out. Watch the words they use, and then think about what is going on here.

That's it true. There is clear evidence that the Russians interfered with our election. There are plenty, even on the Right, that want it investigated, not because they think it changed the results of the election but because it's important to know exactly to what extent they interfered to provide an appropriate response.

Yes many in the left are completely politicizing the Russia situation to deligitimize Trump, but that doesn't take away from the reality of the situation.

 

[HaShev]

They have accused the Russians of hacking the election, and therefore robbing Hillary's chances of winning in which was a lie. This made the Russians toxic to anyone talking to them in the regular context of normal business, and if anyone so much as communicated with them, then they must be guilty of something or even guilty of a crime. If Obama accused the Russians of something they didnot do (hack or influence) the election, and has caused all of this trouble, then he should be brought up on charges. The Demon-crats used the word INFLUENCE because they know that such a word would be broad in scope, and in interpretation.. They figure by way of such a word that it would be impossible for them to be accused of a crime by way of this word used if it all backfired on them. They are carefully choosing such words in so that they can get away with what they are up to, and yet escape justice if their game is figured out. Watch the words they use, and then think about what is going on here.

Every intelligence agency in the country said the Russians hacked the DNC and Podesta's e-mails, DUHhhhh

And every other persons in every other country, like Geico says: "it's what they do"
But why leave out the fact they tried hacking the Republican party and other people of this nation? Why leave out that they do this to find out our plans including sanctions against Russia? They do it for their defense like we do it for ours. Why leave out vital info unless you are trying to manipulate it through
YOUR PROPAGANDA. So by causing destabilization and hindering your own gov't then aren't you working for Russia and Iran in helping them do what they themselves couldn't but want to do? Aren't you guys acting treasonous?

 

[Slade3200]

They have accused the Russians of hacking the election, and therefore robbing Hillary's chances of winning in which was a lie. This made the Russians toxic to anyone talking to them in the regular context of normal business, and if anyone so much as communicated with them, then they must be guilty of something or even guilty of a crime. If Obama accused the Russians of something they didnot do (hack or influence) the election, and has caused all of this trouble, then he should be brought up on charges. The Demon-crats used the word INFLUENCE because they know that such a word would be broad in scope, and in interpretation.. They figure by way of such a word that it would be impossible for them to be accused of a crime by way of this word used if it all backfired on them. They are carefully choosing such words in so that they can get away with what they are up to, and yet escape justice if their game is figured out. Watch the words they use, and then think about what is going on here.

Every intelligence agency in the country said the Russians hacked the DNC and Podesta's e-mails, DUHhhhh

And every other persons in every other country, like Geico says: "it's what they do"
But why leave out the fact they tried hacking the Republican party and other people of this nation? Why leave out that they do this to find out our plans including sanctions against Russia? They do it fir thwir defense lije we do it for ours. Why leave out vital info unless you are trying to manipulate it through
YOUR PROPAGANDA. So by causing destabilization and hindering your own gov't then aren't you working for Russia and Iran in helping them do what they themselves couldn't but want to do? Aren't you guys acting treasonous?

I don't think that has been left out. Ive heard plenty about the attempts to hack the republicans, but they were not successful

 

[HaShev]

They have accused the Russians of hacking the election, and therefore robbing Hillary's chances of winning in which was a lie. This made the Russians toxic to anyone talking to them in the regular context of normal business, and if anyone so much as communicated with them, then they must be guilty of something or even guilty of a crime. If Obama accused the Russians of something they didnot do (hack or influence) the election, and has caused all of this trouble, then he should be brought up on charges. The Demon-crats used the word INFLUENCE because they know that such a word would be broad in scope, and in interpretation.. They (the Dem accusers for political purposes), figure by way of such a word that it would be impossible for them to be accused of a crime by way of this word used if it all backfired on them. They are carefully choosing such words in so that they can get away with what they are up to, and yet escape justice if their game is figured out. Watch the words they use, and then think about what is going on here.

That's it true. There is clear evidence that the Russians interfered with our election. There are plenty, even on the Right, that want it investigated, not because they think it changed the results of the election but because it's important to know exactly to what extent they interfered to provide an appropriate response.

Yes many in the left are completely politicizing the Russia situation to deligitimize Trump, but that doesn't take away from the reality of the situation.

So then Obama has to be appropriately charged with abuse of power for interfering with the Israeli elections. And CNN for our elections.

 

[beagle9]

The thing is, it doesn't matter what it appears he talked to them about. He said he hadn't talked to the Russians, when if it was innocent conversations all he had to do was explain himself. Him lying, then backing up his lies by saying the reports are lies, just tells me his meetings were not innocent ones.

. He didn't talk to them in the context for which the Democrat head hunters are hoping for. It's all about the context of the conversations as pertaining to the accusations or investigation in which is accusing someone of something. Now if what they are accusing sessions of, wasn't the context of his contact with Russian officials, then he didn't lie by saying he didn't speak to the Russians while thinking about the context in which the question was being asked of him. Nothing to see here folks.

They did not ask him if he talked to the Russians about meddling in the elections. They just asked him if he, as a member of Trump's campaign, had talked to the Russians. He had talked to the Russians while he was a member of the Trump campaign, yet he said no. It's pretty cut and dry. If he didn't talk to the Ambassador of Russia about Trump's campaign, all he had to have done was say that he had talked to the Russians, but that it had nothing to do with Trump. Sessions as a lawyer and a judge, would know this very clearly... that his answers are indeed a lie, despite how some want to read into them. His types of answers is the same type of answers that get regular citizens thrown in jail with a guilty verdict in a court of law.

. So the questions were misleading, and they were carefully worded in order to set the AG up ?? Yes they were, and your post here confirms it. Now what penalties are there for intentionally misleading the Attorney General Jeff Sessions with an attempt to set him up in this way ? Franken should be investigated to see if there was any collusion between him and any of his colleagues in trying to set the AG up in this way. You people are getting caught in your own traps.

Think you got that backwards sir... It can be a crime to lie or intentionally mislead congress with testimony. There was nothing tricky about Franken's question, he asked what Sessions would do if there was evidence of Trump surrogates communicating with Russians. Sessions decided not to answer the question and volunteered the statement calling himself a surrogate and falsely proclaiming that he had no communication with the Russians. He could have easily said that he had meetings as a Senator but not as a surrogate but he didn't... Could have been a simple brain fart or it could have been an intentional deception. Flynn has already been fired over similar circumstances so this is a big deal.

For Sessions it could be a big misunderstanding and if so then thats fine. But he has said multiple times that he didn't communicate with the Russians and now there is evidence to the contrary so he is either mistaken, lying, or not being completely forthcoming. Either way, it is a fair discussion to have and worth investigating. He did the right thing by recusing himself from the investigation. I think thats as far as its going to go.

. Any question posed by Franken was carefully thought out, and was designed to trip Sessions up I believe (Franken not being genuine), and it was to make him "Senator Jeff Sessions" after taking the bait to appear exactly in the ways that you have now taken the bait on also. It didn't work though, because just as your brain is telling you also in this reply, that something isn't right, and you are inclined to believe Sessions in the situation it seems to me. Franken I believe, is or thinks he is a master of deceptive practices in his speak, and he has since perfected this art in his celebrity career where as fooling people is key, and then making them laugh about it afterwards is evil... He (Franken) figured his act could be applied greatly in politics, and he may have been right.

 

[Lewdog]

He was asked if ANYONE involved with the Trump campaign had contact with the Russians. In his response he said he was a surrogate of the Trump campaign, and in the next breath said he hadn't had contact with the Russians... this is about as simple as things can possibly get.

Sessions never admitted he was a Trump surrogate. Read it again, but slowly.

Sessions - "I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I am unable to comment on it."

Where did Sessions admit to being a Trump surrogate? Where?

From March 2016:

"The team of foreign policy advisers, led by Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, consists of counter-terrorism expert Walid Phares, energy consultant George Papadopoulos, former Defense Department inspector general Joe Schmitz, managing partner of Global Energy Capital Carter Page and former Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg. Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks confirmed the names to CNN."

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions arranges meeting between Donald Trump, influential Republicans

So you might want to look for a better excuse... and the fact his position within the Trump campaign had to do with foreign policy, only worsens the fact he was talking with the Russian Ambassador in private.

 

[beagle9]

It's just horrible!!! I don't know how you can go on. Maybe you should just end it all and find peace.

After 30 years of total GOP BS propaganda, we're used to it, dupe. Now WE're having the fun for a change. Based on FACTS for a change...

well shit just blame bush right?

Stupid taking point of course. The longest, stupidest wars EVER that wrecked the ME AND a corrupt WORLD DEPRESSION have lasting effects, MORON. LOL. And now back to THIS disastrous GOP swamp, troll.

funny how you all don't want trump to blame obummer and you had no problem with obummer blaming bush. such fking class, hypocrites!!!!!!............

Obama ENDED the depression here and the stupidest wars EVER, and all his policies save ACA were blocked by the mindless lying GOP DUHHH. Blame him for WHAT, dupe?

Ended the wars or made them far worse ?? Last I checked we are back in Iraq cleaning up what the Kenyan caused, and worse he was releasing terrorist from Gitmo so they could go back to the battlefield to kill Americans again ?? On and on it goes.

 

[francoHFW]

Hashev has been living in a cave the past 2 months.

On the news RIGHT NOW.
" The coverup may be worse than the crime."

Just like Nixon. Hashev probably never heard of him.

The intelligence community said NO VOTES WERE TAMPERED, they did a recount in some states and found nothing.
They have however found 6% of the votes in some states (I think Ohio?) comprised of illegal aliens illegal votes opposing the Dems claim there was 0 votes. So the only ones found tampering was the Dems, and by ypur c0ncern they should "step down from office" for their tampering of foreign elections like Obama did to Israel, and for this election when they abused piwer to register foreign immigrants in exchange for their votes.
Dems also traded votes to circumvent the electorate, even though that is legal it was considered cheating and disgraceful.
We wonct discuss the many dead voters who miraculously come to life to vote for
Hillary's and Dems dead campaign.
Weekend at Bernies takes on a while new meaning wth you corrupt guys.

NOBODY but GOPers ever said the machines were hacked or illegals voted, dupe. You lying GOPers and the Russians are doing a GREAT job at ruining faith in America.

After 30 years of Voodoo: worst min. wage, work conditions, illegal work safeguards, vacations, work week, college costs, rich/poor gap, upward social mobility, % homeless and in prison EVAH, and in the modern world!!

Hashev has been living in a cave the past 2 months.

On the news RIGHT NOW.
" The coverup may be worse than the crime."

Just like Nixon. Hashev probably never heard of him.

The intelligence community said NO VOTES WERE TAMPERED, they did a recount in some states and found nothing.
They have however found 6% of the votes in some states (I think Ohio?) comprised of illegal aliens illegal votes opposing the Dems claim there was 0 votes. So the only ones found tampering was the Dems, and by ypur c0ncern they should "step down from office" for their tampering of foreign elections like Obama did to Israel, and for this election when they abused piwer to register foreign immigrants in exchange for their votes.
Dems also traded votes to circumvent the electorate, even though that is legal it was considered cheating and disgraceful.
We wonct discuss the many dead voters who miraculously come to life to vote for
Hillary's and Dems dead campaign.
Weekend at Bernies takes on a while new meaning wth you corrupt guys.

NOBODY but GOPers ever said the machines were hacked or illegals voted, dupe. You lying GOPers and the Russians are doing a GREAT job at ruining faith in America.

After 30 years of Voodoo: worst min. wage, work conditions, illegal work safeguards, vacations, work week, college costs, rich/poor gap, upward social mobility, % homeless and in prison EVAH, and in the modern world!!

So, who had the power to correct some of those wrongs for the past 8 years and didn't? hmm?

I'll wait.

Obama without pure, mindless GOP obstruction, dupe. Tell us how Obama had control for 2 years, dupes.

 

[beagle9]

They have accused the Russians of hacking the election, and therefore robbing Hillary's chances of winning in which was a lie. This made the Russians toxic to anyone talking to them in the regular context of normal business, and if anyone so much as communicated with them, then they must be guilty of something or even guilty of a crime. If Obama accused the Russians of something they didnot do (hack or influence) the election, and has caused all of this trouble, then he should be brought up on charges. The Demon-crats used the word INFLUENCE because they know that such a word would be broad in scope, and in interpretation.. They (the Dem accusers for political purposes), figure by way of such a word that it would be impossible for them to be accused of a crime by way of this word used if it all backfired on them. They are carefully choosing such words in so that they can get away with what they are up to, and yet escape justice if their game is figured out. Watch the words they use, and then think about what is going on here.

That's it true. There is clear evidence that the Russians interfered with our election. There are plenty, even on the Right, that want it investigated, not because they think it changed the results of the election but because it's important to know exactly to what extent they interfered to provide an appropriate response.

Yes many in the left are completely politicizing the Russia situation to deligitimize Trump, but that doesn't take away from the reality of the situation.

So then Obama has to be appropriately charged with abuse of power for interfering with the Israeli elections. And CNN for our elections.

. Yes, Netanyahu should call for Obama's extradition to Israel so he can stand trial there for trying to undermine that election. Egypt should also call for his extradition for attempting to undermine it's reaction to the brotherhood trying to take over Egypt, and calling for Egypt to place Morsi back into power as the new democratically elected leader there. And he wanted this no matter what the Egyptians new about the situation in their own nation ? On and on it goes.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Sessions isn't going anywhere, folks.

 

[beagle9]

The thing is, it doesn't matter what it appears he talked to them about. He said he hadn't talked to the Russians, when if it was innocent conversations all he had to do was explain himself. Him lying, then backing up his lies by saying the reports are lies, just tells me his meetings were not innocent ones.

According to the article, Sessions was asked in his confirmation hearing about meetings with the Trump campaign, not meetings that were the normal condition of his job in the Senate.

Your lying tells me you are biased....... but we already knew that.

What lie? He was asked if he had any contact with the Russians. He said NO. He was working a two pronged role as a Senator AND Trump campaign advisor at the time. All he had to do was say was "Yes it had to do with business related to my role as a Senator." He didn't. He lied.

You're calling someone a liar for giving an opinion on something tells me you don't even know what a lie is.

Actually, no he wasn't asked if he had any contact with the Russians. The fact that your claiming he was tells anyone familiar with the exchange that you aren't familiar with what he was asked or how he responded.

He was asked if ANYONE involved with the Trump campaign had contact with the Russians. In his response he said he was a surrogate of the Trump campaign, and in the next breath said he hadn't had contact with the Russians... this is about as simple as things can possibly get.

. Good grief... He said he wasn't a surrogate all though he was called that a few times in which he laughed about because it wasn't true. You people can't help but lie, and lie, and lie, and lie.

 

[radical right]

Sessions never admitted he was a Trump surrogate. Read it again, but slowly.

From March 2016:

"The team of foreign policy advisers, led by Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, consists of counter-terrorism expert Walid Phares, energy consultant George Papadopoulos, former Defense Department inspector general Joe Schmitz, managing partner of Global Energy Capital Carter Page and former Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg. Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks confirmed the names to CNN.".

As I said, Sessions never admitted he was a Trump surrogate. Show us a quote from sessions where he admits it.

 

[beagle9]

They have accused the Russians of hacking the election, and therefore robbing Hillary's chances of winning in which was a lie. This made the Russians toxic to anyone talking to them in the regular context of normal business, and if anyone so much as communicated with them, then they must be guilty of something or even guilty of a crime. If Obama accused the Russians of something they didnot do (hack or influence) the election, and has caused all of this trouble, then he should be brought up on charges. The Demon-crats used the word INFLUENCE because they know that such a word would be broad in scope, and in interpretation.. They (the Dem accusers for political purposes), figure by way of such a word that it would be impossible for them to be accused of a crime by way of this word used if it all backfired on them. They are carefully choosing such words in so that they can get away with what they are up to, and yet escape justice if their game is figured out. Watch the words they use, and then think about what is going on here.

That's it true. There is clear evidence that the Russians interfered with our election. There are plenty, even on the Right, that want it investigated, not because they think it changed the results of the election but because it's important to know exactly to what extent they interfered to provide an appropriate response.

Yes many in the left are completely politicizing the Russia situation to deligitimize Trump, but that doesn't take away from the reality of the situation.

. To undermine our nation with this bull crap is pure poison, and we all will see in the end. It's time to get on with what we are seeing as very positive results in this election, and quickly leave the past to be judged by the historians now.

 

[Slade3200]

They have accused the Russians of hacking the election, and therefore robbing Hillary's chances of winning in which was a lie. This made the Russians toxic to anyone talking to them in the regular context of normal business, and if anyone so much as communicated with them, then they must be guilty of something or even guilty of a crime. If Obama accused the Russians of something they didnot do (hack or influence) the election, and has caused all of this trouble, then he should be brought up on charges. The Demon-crats used the word INFLUENCE because they know that such a word would be broad in scope, and in interpretation.. They (the Dem accusers for political purposes), figure by way of such a word that it would be impossible for them to be accused of a crime by way of this word used if it all backfired on them. They are carefully choosing such words in so that they can get away with what they are up to, and yet escape justice if their game is figured out. Watch the words they use, and then think about what is going on here.

That's it true. There is clear evidence that the Russians interfered with our election. There are plenty, even on the Right, that want it investigated, not because they think it changed the results of the election but because it's important to know exactly to what extent they interfered to provide an appropriate response.

Yes many in the left are completely politicizing the Russia situation to deligitimize Trump, but that doesn't take away from the reality of the situation.

So then Obama has to be appropriately charged with abuse of power for interfering with the Israeli elections. And CNN for our elections.

I don't know anything about that but sure if that's what you think, although it sounds like you are making excuses for Russia, is that right?

 

[initforme]

The plot is thickening......no doubt. Damage control in full response.

 

[initforme]

Sessions looks like a ignorant soul.

 

[Slade3200]

The thing is, it doesn't matter what it appears he talked to them about. He said he hadn't talked to the Russians, when if it was innocent conversations all he had to do was explain himself. Him lying, then backing up his lies by saying the reports are lies, just tells me his meetings were not innocent ones.

. He didn't talk to them in the context for which the Democrat head hunters are hoping for. It's all about the context of the conversations as pertaining to the accusations or investigation in which is accusing someone of something. Now if what they are accusing sessions of, wasn't the context of his contact with Russian officials, then he didn't lie by saying he didn't speak to the Russians while thinking about the context in which the question was being asked of him. Nothing to see here folks.

They did not ask him if he talked to the Russians about meddling in the elections. They just asked him if he, as a member of Trump's campaign, had talked to the Russians. He had talked to the Russians while he was a member of the Trump campaign, yet he said no. It's pretty cut and dry. If he didn't talk to the Ambassador of Russia about Trump's campaign, all he had to have done was say that he had talked to the Russians, but that it had nothing to do with Trump. Sessions as a lawyer and a judge, would know this very clearly... that his answers are indeed a lie, despite how some want to read into them. His types of answers is the same type of answers that get regular citizens thrown in jail with a guilty verdict in a court of law.

. So the questions were misleading, and they were carefully worded in order to set the AG up ?? Yes they were, and your post here confirms it. Now what penalties are there for intentionally misleading the Attorney General Jeff Sessions with an attempt to set him up in this way ? Franken should be investigated to see if there was any collusion between him and any of his colleagues in trying to set the AG up in this way. You people are getting caught in your own traps.

Think you got that backwards sir... It can be a crime to lie or intentionally mislead congress with testimony. There was nothing tricky about Franken's question, he asked what Sessions would do if there was evidence of Trump surrogates communicating with Russians. Sessions decided not to answer the question and volunteered the statement calling himself a surrogate and falsely proclaiming that he had no communication with the Russians. He could have easily said that he had meetings as a Senator but not as a surrogate but he didn't... Could have been a simple brain fart or it could have been an intentional deception. Flynn has already been fired over similar circumstances so this is a big deal.

For Sessions it could be a big misunderstanding and if so then thats fine. But he has said multiple times that he didn't communicate with the Russians and now there is evidence to the contrary so he is either mistaken, lying, or not being completely forthcoming. Either way, it is a fair discussion to have and worth investigating. He did the right thing by recusing himself from the investigation. I think thats as far as its going to go.

. Any question posed by Franken was carefully thought out, and was designed to trip Sessions up I believe (Franken not being genuine), and it was to make him "Senator Jeff Sessions" after taking the bait to appear exactly in the ways that you have now taken the bait on also. It didn't work though, because just as your brain is telling you also in this reply, that something isn't right, and you are inclined to believe Sessions in the situation it seems to me. Franken I believe, is or thinks he is a master of deceptive practices in his speak, and he has since perfected this art in his celebrity career where as fooling people is key, and then making them laugh about it afterwards is evil... He (Franken) figured his act could be applied greatly in politics, and he may have been right.

Your getting a little too far off the tracks here. Frankens question was clearly geared to get Sessions on the record stating what he would do if evidence was presented showing communication between the Trump campaign and Russia. Not that tricky. If you listen closely you'll hear sessions avoiding answering the question and volunteering the personal statements of misinformation that got him in this mess. Your finger point at Franken is misguided

 

[Lewdog]

Sessions never admitted he was a Trump surrogate. Read it again, but slowly.

From March 2016:

"The team of foreign policy advisers, led by Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, consists of counter-terrorism expert Walid Phares, energy consultant George Papadopoulos, former Defense Department inspector general Joe Schmitz, managing partner of Global Energy Capital Carter Page and former Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg. Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks confirmed the names to CNN.".

As I said, Sessions never admitted he was a Trump surrogate. Show us a quote from sessions where he admits it.

Does it matter if he admitted it? It's on record straight from Trump that he was an advisor to his campaign. Are you human? If you deny you are human does that make you not human?

 

[beagle9]

They have accused the Russians of hacking the election, and therefore robbing Hillary's chances of winning in which was a lie. This made the Russians toxic to anyone talking to them in the regular context of normal business, and if anyone so much as communicated with them, then they must be guilty of something or even guilty of a crime. If Obama accused the Russians of something they didnot do (hack or influence) the election, and has caused all of this trouble, then he should be brought up on charges. The Demon-crats used the word INFLUENCE because they know that such a word would be broad in scope, and in interpretation.. They (the Dem accusers for political purposes), figure by way of such a word that it would be impossible for them to be accused of a crime by way of this word used if it all backfired on them. They are carefully choosing such words in so that they can get away with what they are up to, and yet escape justice if their game is figured out. Watch the words they use, and then think about what is going on here.

That's it true. There is clear evidence that the Russians interfered with our election. There are plenty, even on the Right, that want it investigated, not because they think it changed the results of the election but because it's important to know exactly to what extent they interfered to provide an appropriate response.

Yes many in the left are completely politicizing the Russia situation to deligitimize Trump, but that doesn't take away from the reality of the situation.

So then Obama has to be appropriately charged with abuse of power for interfering with the Israeli elections. And CNN for our elections.

I don't know anything about that but sure if that's what you think, although it sounds like you are making excuses for Russia, is that right?

. You got something against Russia ? Why ?? Did they not suffer enough trying to bend over backwards for us ?? Mr. Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL. They did, and then we got Yeltsin bending over backwards for us in transforming the Soviet Union, and then we backed the Afghan rebels against them in Afghanistan, and on and on it went. Now we are treating them as toxic, and our enemy over politics or Hillary ?