I don't agree with your analysis of MSM (and that includes Fox)- I find trustworthyness varies according to the agency and the topics they write about. Broadbrushing them is like broad brushing all liberals as libtards or all conservatives as conservatards. (and, frankly, I get sick of being termed "libtard"). The media is only as good as the readers willingness to apply critical thinking - which I didn't in this OP. Mea Culpa. The NYT article wasn't WRONG in the sense that every statement was factual- it wasn't "fake news" - nothing was made up. But it was presented in such a way as to imply this was something new and unprecedented, and that former administrations had acted differently so it was deliberately being deceptive.
And the 2 pages of MSM that did the same?
What 2 pages of "MSM"? MSM is a wide variety of different media sources with differing levels of accuracy and differing bias' - so what are you talking about with this nefarious "MSM"?
Propaganda is not fake news?
News can be fake, biased, slanted, inaccurate and those can all mean different things.
Fake news is fake - mostly made up. One example would be the claim that "
Trump Made a Victory Tour in Red Square" or "
Pizzagate".
Biased and slanted news is just that - it's "accurate" in so far as the facts check out, but it's formated in such a way as to imply something else or it leaves out information and context that provides the whole picture. It's not fake news.
News can also just be wrong - for example the election predictions (and predictions are just that, predictions) - it's not not necessarily deliberate slanting or bias.
Right wing propaganda is fake news and left wing propaganda isn't?
Anything can be fake news.
The story was a lie. It is NOT unprecedented. It is the norm. They made up a story and the MSM pushed it.
The facts presented in the story weren't lies - the conclusions and the implications were dishonest and heavily slanted.
Trump DID say - NO EXCEPTIONS
Precedent of previous administrations was that the incoming administration could be petitioned for exceptions and they might or might not be granted.
The article left out a lot of context - for example, that what Trump did was largely normal and in line with other administrations who had granted exceptions (but not that many). The NYT slanted the story to imply that Trump was being far crueler than preceding administrations.
Many of those same outlets published when Obama did the same but with no negative connotations. The whole story is that Trump is hurting children and families in this unprecedented spiteful move. That is FAKE NEWS and it has been ongoing for a long time. Of course we don't trust them. You shouldn't either, much less show such disdain for people who rightly call the MSM heavily left leaning.
I don't trust your rightwing-leaning MSM outlets either with all the negative, fake and dishonest reporting they've done on Obama. But it's not necessarily "fake news".