Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Religion is about faith of evidence unseen, science is about evidence seen and repeatable.
SJ and his buds know not of what they speak.
And you cant even wuote St Paul correctly.
Damn you are a freaking loser and ahalf.
Sorry bout that,
1. I find it amusing when these crackpots pipe in (Obamerican), and all they do is show their atheist ass, and attack me the truth of this topic, and have *nothing* to stand on as far as the debate at hand.
2. Even on a bad day for me proves a lesson, good days like sunshine are a blessing.
3. Thanks Obama american.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Religion is about faith of evidence unseen, science is about evidence seen and repeatable.
SJ and his buds know not of what they speak.
And you cant even wuote St Paul correctly.
Damn you are a freaking loser and ahalf.
It's called paraphrasing.
You still can't defend your position logically, because you have a logical fallacy in your argument.
You can't disprove faith by science or science by faith.
You silly heads are so easy to deal with.
Those with faith in faith offer nothing more than those with faith in science.
They 'know' what they 'know', but neither side can prove crack about the other.
I love it when the right wing talks about "science".
It would be like me talking about the "Eskimo Religion". Something I don't even know if it exists.
Not very informative but occasionally entertaining.
So And yet were it not for the Judeo-Christian faith, science would never have had the influence on society that it has had in Western culture but now that our society is bleaching itself of all its Judeo-Christain values, science is returning to the mystical view that it had prior to the rise of Judeo-Christianity.
You funny!
First, I dont think the Muslim are heathen by any means, so dont project that onto me.Where was it practiced before 1300 when Judeo-Christian Europe wallowed in the midst of darkness and confusion? "Heathen" Muslim middle east?
You are not very convincing.
So And yet were it not for the Judeo-Christian faith, science would never have had the influence on society that it has had in Western culture but now that our society is bleaching itself of all its Judeo-Christain values, science is returning to the mystical view that it had prior to the rise of Judeo-Christianity.
You funny!
Just because you dont understand the point and it then somehow amuses you doenst mean that there is no validity to the point.
Why is it the case that in 1500 modern science was best practiced in the West while it had fallen into stagnation in the Ottoman Empire, the Arabs, the Indians and the Chinese?
Why did was it left for Europeans to weaponize black powder? To prove that the sun was the center of our solar system? To develop modern medicine and Universities?
Because we believed that the universe was not controled by arbitrary spirits with whimsical personalities. We believed that these things happened according to God's Laws and that it was therefore of benefit to explore what these laws were and to use them to our gain.
The very fact that we call the opperating principles of science 'Laws' points to our axiomatic assumption that an intelligence authored these laws instead of them being merely arbitrary behavior.
So laugh all you want; it does nothing to further your undrstanding of our world, our culture or how our culture and science have both evolved over the last millenia.
I love it when the right wing talks about "science".
It would be like me talking about the "Eskimo Religion". Something I don't even know if it exists.
Not very informative but occasionally entertaining.
And I love it when arrogant narcisists like you deign to pronounce your whirlwind of bullshit to the rest of us unwashed heathen.
Go fuck yourself, dumbass.
Jim, you are beginning to expand the tent. Science has always been practiced. The Europeans built on the Muslims Arab and Persian learning. Your OP is bust.
You just blahblahblah blah light a fart blah blah blah throw poop blah blah duh[/IMG]
Jim, you are beginning to expand the tent. Science has always been practiced. The Europeans built on the Muslims Arab and Persian learning. Your OP is bust.
So you think science does not include the scientific method?
What was practiced prior to the SM was just trial and experiment with no widely recognised formal process at all.
Lol, you are a bust.
BTW, since I already stated that we built on what the Arabs and others passed on to us, why do you mention it like your rebutting my statement?
By Hamza Andreas Tzortzis
Here is the abstract:
This paper is an analysis of chapter 23 verses 12 to 14 of the Quran in light of modern embryology. This study will provide a linguistic breakdown of the relevant verses and correlate these linguistic items to modern science. To ensure a comprehensive understanding of this study, an overview of quranic exegesis will be provided to appreciate how the Quran is made accessible and intelligible to the reader. This study will also address various contentions, which attempt to challenge the credibility of the quranic discourse and its concurrence with modern embryology.
In chapter 23 verses 12 to 14 the Quran provides eight meaningful points describing the process of the developing human embryo:
We created man from an essence of clay, then We placed him as a drop of fluid in a safe place. Then We made that drop of fluid into a clinging form, and then We made that form into a lump of flesh, and We made that lump into bones, and We clothed those bones with flesh, and later We made him into other forms. Glory be to God the best of creators.
Jim, you are beginning to expand the tent. Science has always been practiced. The Europeans built on the Muslims Arab and Persian learning. Your OP is bust.
So you think science does not include the scientific method?
What was practiced prior to the SM was just trial and experiment with no widely recognised formal process at all.
Lol, you are a bust.
BTW, since I already stated that we built on what the Arabs and others passed on to us, why do you mention it like your rebutting my statement?
Your history lesson is flawed in places.
We are not the end product of science historically, unless we blow ourselves up,
which means that some other civilization will build on ours.
Probably the neo-communist Confucians of China.
