Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
----------------------------------------- yeah , i agree with that [chuckle] . Only problem though is that with that excuse given to the 'government man' makes criminals and cowardly hiders and liars out of supposedly FREE Americans who should be able to be Free to own and use any weapon of the American Combat Soldier that they want to own and use Pred .
LolLolYeah, but that's just a foot in the door.
You do know the LV shooter had real automatic weapons, correct?
Several of them, and 1 of the ARs barrel melted.
I say don't give them an inch, no ban on anything!
I say you are cuckoo. There is no reason to own a bump stock.
its not about your feelings
I could say there is no reason for you to be allowed to speak in public
It is a fact. A bump stock is not required to use a rifle.
Irrelevant, ******* pieces of shit control freaks like yourselves need to shut the **** up
Try and make me. You should be locked in a insane asylum because you are a crazy right wing nut. It is very relevant. Banning bump stocks has nothing to do with owning a weapon.
FFL------------------------------------------------- see the things that you anti gun people just don't know . But hey BusyBee , machine guns are LEGAL in quite a few States in the USA . I won't go into details but take it from me that Machine Guns are legal in quite a few USA States BusyBee .SO WHAT, THAT CHANGES NOTHING
YES IT DOES. IT MEANS THAT THE SECOND AMENDMENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BUMP STOCKS.
you need to learn the original intent of the 2nd before you make a bigger ass of yourself,,,
the government has machine guns which means the people can have machine guns, and only commies disagree with that
You are a far right wing looney toon. Try owning a working machine gun and you will be arrested and jailed.
You are so much shit. Supporting reasonable restrictions is not anti-gun. It that is true, then the majority of Americans are anti-gun
From the Federalist Society. Hardly a left wing organization.
"Under the NFA, it is illegal for any private civilian to own any fully automatic weapons manufactured after May 19, 1986. Only certain types of FFL/SOTs may make them, and then only for purchase by qualified state and federal agencies. There are no exceptions. According to the ATF’s official handbook on NFA laws and regulations, it’s not even legal to make new replacement parts for pre-1986 machine guns: “There is no exception allowing for the lawful production, transfer, possession, or use of a post-May 18, 1986 machinegun receiver as a replacement receiver on a weapon produced prior to May 19, 1986.”
Here Are The Actual Federal Laws Regulating Machine Guns In The U.S. - The Federalist
dear clayton my commie friendThe original intent of the Second Amendment can be found here:I ain't a commie. I said I understood your point. Perhaps you should calm down. as far as vegas, I'd say you could have hit as many in that dense crowd with or without a bump stock. More accurately too.I understand your point but no stock is needed to bump fire a rifle. I don't like it either but they are useless.YOU CANT BE A 2nd supporter and be OK with any ban,,,its like banning hate speech and being a 1st supporter
USELESS???
what about las vegas?? not so useless are they,,,,that might be why you commies want them gone
sorry but you cant be a 2nd supporter and be OK with banning
that makes you a closet commie
I suggest you and your other commie friends learn the original intent of the 2nd before you talk about it
you cant have the very people the 2nd was meant to protect us against deciding what we can and cant have
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html
It’s suggested that you and others ignorant of the original intent of the Amendment read the ruling before exhibiting any more of your ignorance.
----------------------------------------- yeah , i agree with that [chuckle] . Only problem though is that with that excuse given to the 'government man' makes criminals and cowardly hiders and liars out of supposedly FREE Americans who should be able to be Free to own and use any weapon of the American Combat Soldier that they want to own and use Pred .
------------------------------------------------- see the things that you anti gun people just don't know . But hey BusyBee , machine guns are LEGAL in quite a few States in the USA . I won't go into details but take it from me that Machine Guns are legal in quite a few USA States BusyBee .' mistake bump .It is a fact. A bump stock is not required to use a rifle.
SO WHAT, THAT CHANGES NOTHING
YES IT DOES. IT MEANS THAT THE SECOND AMENDMENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BUMP STOCKS.
you need to learn the original intent of the 2nd before you make a bigger ass of yourself,,,
the government has machine guns which means the people can have machine guns, and only commies disagree with that
You are a far right wing looney toon. Try owning a working machine gun and you will be arrested and jailed.
Anti gun nutters like yourself have no common sense... You use emotion to make all of your decisions and you want to control people you disagree withNonsense.No need to muddy the waters.Ok. What do you have a problem with being banned?
This thread ain't about me. It's about the bump stock ban. ...![]()
No, you said you support the Second Amendment. But you have no problem with banning bump stocks. So what would you have a problem with being banned. Come on, give us an example. How about bolt action rifles that fire a .50 BMG round that can penetrate four inches of reinforced concrete?
The Second Amendment covers guns not bump stocks. Reasonable regulation does not violate the Constitution.
The definition of reasonable regulation is what we are trying to define. What is reasonable? It was reasonable to have blue laws covering among other things free speech, and those laws were struck down by the Supreme Court as a violation of the First Amendment. It was reasonable to “encourage” via physical means in order to get a man to confess, until it was struck down by the Supreme Court as a violation of the Cruel and Unusual punishment and the right not to testify against yourself.
A lot of things were reasonable. And now they aren’t. So what I am trying to find out is what everyone thinks is reasonable regulation. For the anti gunners, the reasonable restriction is a complete ban on private ownership. Is that going to be a mere reasonable restriction in the near future?
No one advocates for the ‘banning’ of the private ownership of firearms.
The Supreme Court has already held that the banning of handguns is un-Constitutional; and the courts have likewise held that the carrying of concealed firearms is Constitutionally protected.
What is considered to be a ‘reasonable restriction’ will be decided by the courts – ultimately the Supreme Court.
And until such time as the Supreme Court rules on a given firearm regulatory measure, those measures will be considered both reasonable and Constitutional.
---------------------------------------------- don't own one but of what use is a 'bump stock' if you can't freely use it Freely and in full view of the 'kings man' [public servant] that you and i pay wages to Pred ??----------------------------------------- yeah , i agree with that [chuckle] . Only problem though is that with that excuse given to the 'government man' makes criminals and cowardly hiders and liars out of supposedly FREE Americans who should be able to be Free to own and use any weapon of the American Combat Soldier that they want to own and use Pred .
Ooooooo… an internet tough guy. Do you have a bump stock? Are you going to show the G-man your bump stock and then refuse to turn it over? You're so brave.
no one "Needs" a lot of the things we have.No one needs a bump stock.
not going to offer a lot of support for a device designed to get around automatic weapons being illegal.And , i am a member of both the NRA and GOA and i'll be sending GOA a Hundred bucks to fight the Bump Stock Ban today . And others should do the same !!
not going to offer a lot of support for a device designed to get around automatic weapons being illegal.And , i am a member of both the NRA and GOA and i'll be sending GOA a Hundred bucks to fight the Bump Stock Ban today . And others should do the same !!
you could do what most who really care will do - use a rubber band.
feel free to go fight for the ability to have 'em back. i support your right to do that if not the right itself.not going to offer a lot of support for a device designed to get around automatic weapons being illegal.And , i am a member of both the NRA and GOA and i'll be sending GOA a Hundred bucks to fight the Bump Stock Ban today . And others should do the same !!
you could do what most who really care will do - use a rubber band.
under the original intent of the 2nd full auto is perfectly legal