Glenn Beck Tanks

Hopey Changey kooks whining about "Negativity" and "Hoping for failure" really is pretty friggin hilarious. Do they actually think that everyone forgot about their incessant preaching of Gloom & Doom for eight straight years? Are these kooks delusional or what? Well anyone with common sense hasn't forgotten about the Hopey Changey's terrible behavior the previous eight years. So feigned outrage just isn't gonna cut it. What a hoot. :)

Yo.........Lying Lips Now.......the reason everyone was talking gloom and doom from 2000-2008, was because Bubble Boy Bush Jr. and Cheney were driving this country straight into the ground.

After 2004, it was a ******* mess, which exploded in their faces 6 months prior to leaving office. Bush and Cheney were hoping that it wouldn't tank until AFTER they left office.

Too bad for them that they were wrong.

Wanna know who I think is delusional Lying Lips Now? You.
 
If Beck has such a huge following, why did his movie SO tank?

I mean, it wasn't merely not doing well, it died.

Why?

Serious question.

I'd have thought it would have done at least a little better than it did.

Anybody here who is a Beck fan actually see it?

If not, why not?

Just like in November, becks people wont get off the couch. :lol:

Oh and Huck is a murderer....:doubt:
 
Hopey Changey kooks whining about "Negativity" and "Hoping for failure" really is pretty friggin hilarious. Do they actually think that everyone forgot about their incessant preaching of Gloom & Doom for eight straight years? Are these kooks delusional or what? Well anyone with common sense hasn't forgotten about the Hopey Changey's terrible behavior the previous eight years. So feigned outrage just isn't gonna cut it. What a hoot. :)

I'm sorry but your post was so random. Like one talking point right after the other in long and rambling thoughts.

Do you ever get better than this?
 
Hopey Changey kooks whining about "Negativity" and "Hoping for failure" really is pretty friggin hilarious. Do they actually think that everyone forgot about their incessant preaching of Gloom & Doom for eight straight years? Are these kooks delusional or what? Well anyone with common sense hasn't forgotten about the Hopey Changey's terrible behavior the previous eight years. So feigned outrage just isn't gonna cut it. What a hoot. :)

Yo.........Lying Lips Now.......the reason everyone was talking gloom and doom from 2000-2008, was because Bubble Boy Bush Jr. and Cheney were driving this country straight into the ground.

After 2004, it was a ******* mess, which exploded in their faces 6 months prior to leaving office. Bush and Cheney were hoping that it wouldn't tank until AFTER they left office.

Too bad for them that they were wrong.

Wanna know who I think is delusional Lying Lips Now? You.

Wow....did you truly fall for that "it is all one man's fault" mantra that every candidate uses when campaigning during a recession?

Do you truly not know how our government works?
 
Hopey Changey kooks whining about "Negativity" and "Hoping for failure" really is pretty friggin hilarious. Do they actually think that everyone forgot about their incessant preaching of Gloom & Doom for eight straight years? Are these kooks delusional or what? Well anyone with common sense hasn't forgotten about the Hopey Changey's terrible behavior the previous eight years. So feigned outrage just isn't gonna cut it. What a hoot. :)

Yo.........Lying Lips Now.......the reason everyone was talking gloom and doom from 2000-2008, was because Bubble Boy Bush Jr. and Cheney were driving this country straight into the ground.

After 2004, it was a ******* mess, which exploded in their faces 6 months prior to leaving office. Bush and Cheney were hoping that it wouldn't tank until AFTER they left office.

Too bad for them that they were wrong.

Wanna know who I think is delusional Lying Lips Now? You.

Interesting observation.......when Bush was President without a majority in congress, he was responsible for everything. Now that Obama is the man, and he HAS NOT ONLY A MAJORITY...but a fillibuster proof majority, yet the reason he cant get anything done is because of the obstructionist republican party.

Do you truly not see the irony in this?
 
Hopey Changey kooks whining about "Negativity" and "Hoping for failure" really is pretty friggin hilarious. Do they actually think that everyone forgot about their incessant preaching of Gloom & Doom for eight straight years? Are these kooks delusional or what? Well anyone with common sense hasn't forgotten about the Hopey Changey's terrible behavior the previous eight years. So feigned outrage just isn't gonna cut it. What a hoot. :)

Yo.........Lying Lips Now.......the reason everyone was talking gloom and doom from 2000-2008, was because Bubble Boy Bush Jr. and Cheney were driving this country straight into the ground.

After 2004, it was a ******* mess, which exploded in their faces 6 months prior to leaving office. Bush and Cheney were hoping that it wouldn't tank until AFTER they left office.

Too bad for them that they were wrong.

Wanna know who I think is delusional Lying Lips Now? You.

Wow....did you truly fall for that "it is all one man's fault" mantra that every candidate uses when campaigning during a recession?

Do you truly not know how our government works?

probably not as well as how familiar you are with how a colostomy bag works!


:lol:


Indeed, it's exactly this kind of post which illustrates what kind of a ******* partisan joke you are, gramps.
 
Yo.........Lying Lips Now.......the reason everyone was talking gloom and doom from 2000-2008, was because Bubble Boy Bush Jr. and Cheney were driving this country straight into the ground.

After 2004, it was a ******* mess, which exploded in their faces 6 months prior to leaving office. Bush and Cheney were hoping that it wouldn't tank until AFTER they left office.

Too bad for them that they were wrong.

Wanna know who I think is delusional Lying Lips Now? You.

Wow....did you truly fall for that "it is all one man's fault" mantra that every candidate uses when campaigning during a recession?

Do you truly not know how our government works?

probably not as well as how familiar you are with how a colostomy bag works!


:lol:


Indeed, it's exactly this kind of post which illustrates what kind of a ******* partisan joke you are, gramps.

Please explain....please tell me how that was a partisan statement...and please expolain exactly where I am wrong.......sonny boy.
 
Yo.........Lying Lips Now.......the reason everyone was talking gloom and doom from 2000-2008, was because Bubble Boy Bush Jr. and Cheney were driving this country straight into the ground.

After 2004, it was a ******* mess, which exploded in their faces 6 months prior to leaving office. Bush and Cheney were hoping that it wouldn't tank until AFTER they left office.

Too bad for them that they were wrong.

Wanna know who I think is delusional Lying Lips Now? You.

Wow....did you truly fall for that "it is all one man's fault" mantra that every candidate uses when campaigning during a recession?

Do you truly not know how our government works?

probably not as well as how familiar you are with how a colostomy bag works!


:lol:


Indeed, it's exactly this kind of post which illustrates what kind of a ******* partisan joke you are, gramps.

Hey....all talk and no intelligence.....let me ask you a question....

How many initiatives did Bush sign into law without at least a good handful of democratic senators and representatives voting with him?

Here is a hint....NONE.

You are too naive to debate.
 
Hopey Changey kooks whining about "Negativity" and "Hoping for failure" really is pretty friggin hilarious. Do they actually think that everyone forgot about their incessant preaching of Gloom & Doom for eight straight years? Are these kooks delusional or what? Well anyone with common sense hasn't forgotten about the Hopey Changey's terrible behavior the previous eight years. So feigned outrage just isn't gonna cut it. What a hoot. :)

Yo.........Lying Lips Now.......the reason everyone was talking gloom and doom from 2000-2008, was because Bubble Boy Bush Jr. and Cheney were driving this country straight into the ground.

After 2004, it was a ******* mess, which exploded in their faces 6 months prior to leaving office. Bush and Cheney were hoping that it wouldn't tank until AFTER they left office.

Too bad for them that they were wrong.

Wanna know who I think is delusional Lying Lips Now? You.

Interesting observation.......when Bush was President without a majority in congress, he was responsible for everything. Now that Obama is the man, and he HAS NOT ONLY A MAJORITY...but a fillibuster proof majority, yet the reason he cant get anything done is because of the obstructionist republican party.

Do you truly not see the irony in this?

Ahh do not be deceptive, Bush did have a majority in congress for a while.

And just kept signing their spending bills.
 
Hopey Changey kooks whining about "Negativity" and "Hoping for failure" really is pretty friggin hilarious. Do they actually think that everyone forgot about their incessant preaching of Gloom & Doom for eight straight years? Are these kooks delusional or what? Well anyone with common sense hasn't forgotten about the Hopey Changey's terrible behavior the previous eight years. So feigned outrage just isn't gonna cut it. What a hoot. :)

Yo.........Lying Lips Now.......the reason everyone was talking gloom and doom from 2000-2008, was because Bubble Boy Bush Jr. and Cheney were driving this country straight into the ground.

After 2004, it was a ******* mess, which exploded in their faces 6 months prior to leaving office. Bush and Cheney were hoping that it wouldn't tank until AFTER they left office.

Too bad for them that they were wrong.

Wanna know who I think is delusional Lying Lips Now? You.

Interesting observation.......when Bush was President without a majority in congress, he was responsible for everything. Now that Obama is the man, and he HAS NOT ONLY A MAJORITY...but a fillibuster proof majority, yet the reason he cant get anything done is because of the obstructionist republican party.

Do you truly not see the irony in this?

Wrong yet again Lying Lips Now, as from 2000-2006 there was a Republican congress with a Republican president who was trying to put nothing but conservatives on the Supreme Court.

It was only in 2007 (when everyone got tired of being fucked over by Repugnicans), that the Dems ended up with a majority in Congress.

Then Obama took over the White House.

Might wanna get your facts straight.
 
Someone in here actually said Beck wasnt partisan. That has to be the line of the year.

Pre Fox Beck wasn't, now....he is a shill for the right. Its all about the $$$ people. There is no way he works for fox and is not partisan. Its a prerequisite or something.

Zone, sweetie, you're obsessiveness over Glenn and Fox is impressive. Glenn is not partisan - because he's not a Republican. To be partisan, one must firstly be either a Democrat or a Republican. Glenn is neither - that is a fact - whether it suits you or not. Also, Fox employs a variety of commentators with different views - from liberals to conservative. I'm not saying they are not biased to the right but you would make a more valid argument if you throw in some actual fact instead of the paranoid whining.

OK, first I'm going to have to disagree with Zona here, Glenn Beck was quite partisan before he joined Fox. That's why he joined Fox. I remember him from his pre-Fox days and he was a lunatic then too.

Secondly, Cali, honey, sweetums...

"Partisan", in this country, at this moment (And especially in the context it is being used in, in this conversation), means to be either a "Left-Wing" or "Right-Wing" supporter. That is why centrist behavior by Republicans or Democrats is considered to be "Non-Partisan".

Thus extreme left-wing nutjobs and extreme right-wing nutjobs (like Beck or Olbermann) are in fact partisan, one might even go as far to say they are "hyper-partisan".

Whether Beck is a Right-Wing terrorist, a Libertarian, or some completely unknown and independent form of Right-Wing nutjob, he is definitely "Partisan".

And, whatever Beck chooses to call himself, he is a water-carrier for the majority of Republicans and a critic of the majority of Democrats, which makes him a Republican "supporter", or "partisan".
 
Yo.........Lying Lips Now.......the reason everyone was talking gloom and doom from 2000-2008, was because Bubble Boy Bush Jr. and Cheney were driving this country straight into the ground.

After 2004, it was a ******* mess, which exploded in their faces 6 months prior to leaving office. Bush and Cheney were hoping that it wouldn't tank until AFTER they left office.

Too bad for them that they were wrong.

Wanna know who I think is delusional Lying Lips Now? You.

Interesting observation.......when Bush was President without a majority in congress, he was responsible for everything. Now that Obama is the man, and he HAS NOT ONLY A MAJORITY...but a fillibuster proof majority, yet the reason he cant get anything done is because of the obstructionist republican party.

Do you truly not see the irony in this?

Wrong yet again Lying Lips Now, as from 2000-2006 there was a Republican congress with a Republican president who was trying to put nothing but conservatives on the Supreme Court.

It was only in 2007 (when everyone got tired of being fucked over by Repugnicans), that the Dems ended up with a majority in Congress.

Then Obama took over the White House.

Might wanna get your facts straight.

He had a majority for the first 6 years...but not a fillibuster proof majority.
He had nothing his last two years.

My facts are straight.

As for the lying lips crap you loser......got anything better....like addressing the crux of what I was saying....you know...the part about ONE MAN has little power in govertnment?

Jeez....always looking waysto punch holes in the credibility f the messnger.....but never able to punch holes in the messge.

Go back to sucking your thumb...I d not debate childen.
 
Someone in here actually said Beck wasnt partisan. That has to be the line of the year.

Pre Fox Beck wasn't, now....he is a shill for the right. Its all about the $$$ people. There is no way he works for fox and is not partisan. Its a prerequisite or something.

Zone, sweetie, you're obsessiveness over Glenn and Fox is impressive. Glenn is not partisan - because he's not a Republican. To be partisan, one must firstly be either a Democrat or a Republican. Glenn is neither - that is a fact - whether it suits you or not. Also, Fox employs a variety of commentators with different views - from liberals to conservative. I'm not saying they are not biased to the right but you would make a more valid argument if you throw in some actual fact instead of the paranoid whining.

OK, first I'm going to have to disagree with Zona here, Glenn Beck was quite partisan before he joined Fox. That's why he joined Fox. I remember him from his pre-Fox days and he was a lunatic then too.

Secondly, Cali, honey, sweetums...

"Partisan", in this country, at this moment (And especially in the context it is being used in, in this conversation), means to be either a "Left-Wing" or "Right-Wing" supporter. That is why centrist behavior by Republicans or Democrats is considered to be "Non-Partisan".

Thus extreme left-wing nutjobs and extreme right-wing nutjobs (like Beck or Olbermann) are in fact partisan, one might even go as far to say they are "hyper-partisan".

Whether Beck is a Right-Wing terrorist, a Libertarian, or some completely unknown and independent form of Right-Wing nutjob, he is definitely "Partisan".

And, whatever Beck chooses to call himself, he is a water-carrier for the majority of Republicans and a critic of the majority of Democrats, which makes him a Republican "supporter", or "partisan".

Why must you lie to make a point?
Are you a progressive?
If you truly watched Beck over the years, you would know he had an allegiance to one thing and one thing only....SMALL GOVERNMENT.

He attacked any republican that wanted to increase government.

That makes him NON PARTISAN as it pertains to parties.

You did not watch the man or you would have known how he threw many republicans over the years under the bus.

So why do you lie?
 
Tell me something............how is a majority NOT a majority?

Face it ya ******* old and tired loser, Repugnicans fucked up this country from 2000-2006, because they had control of the whole government, which is why we WENT TO WAR IN THE WRONG ******* COUNTRY.

Iraq was nothing more than a war for oil, and even then, it didn't work as advertised.
 
He had a majority for the first 6 years...but not a fillibuster proof majority.
He had nothing his last two years.

My facts are straight.

As for the lying lips crap you loser......got anything better....like addressing the crux of what I was saying....you know...the part about ONE MAN has little power in govertnment?

Jeez....always looking waysto punch holes in the credibility f the messnger.....but never able to punch holes in the messge.

Go back to sucking your thumb...I d not debate childen.

Obama does not have a "filibuster proof" majority.

Joe Lieberman is not a Democrat, and agrees with Republicans on most issues.

In addition, The Democratic congress did not have enough votes to overturn vetoes during Bush's last 2 years, and Bush vetoed just about every major legislation that came across his desk. He used to brag about it.
 
15th post
Interesting observation.......when Bush was President without a majority in congress, he was responsible for everything. Now that Obama is the man, and he HAS NOT ONLY A MAJORITY...but a fillibuster proof majority, yet the reason he cant get anything done is because of the obstructionist republican party.

Do you truly not see the irony in this?

Wrong yet again Lying Lips Now, as from 2000-2006 there was a Republican congress with a Republican president who was trying to put nothing but conservatives on the Supreme Court.

It was only in 2007 (when everyone got tired of being fucked over by Repugnicans), that the Dems ended up with a majority in Congress.

Then Obama took over the White House.

Might wanna get your facts straight.

He had a majority for the first 6 years...but not a fillibuster proof majority.
He had nothing his last two years.

My facts are straight.

As for the lying lips crap you loser......got anything better....like addressing the crux of what I was saying....you know...the part about ONE MAN has little power in govertnment?

Jeez....always looking waysto punch holes in the credibility f the messnger.....but never able to punch holes in the messge.

Go back to sucking your thumb...I d not debate childen.

How many bills did Bush veto in his first 6 years?

Hmm he must have agreed with what they were doing then.
 
Tell me something............how is a majority NOT a majority?

Face it ya ******* old and tired loser, Repugnicans fucked up this country from 2000-2006, because they had control of the whole government, which is why we WENT TO WAR IN THE WRONG ******* COUNTRY.

Iraq was nothing more than a war for oil, and even then, it didn't work as advertised.

SO I will now ask a THIRD person on this thread....

Exactly how many intitiatives did Bush sign into law without a large handful of democrats on board and voting for it?

No one else will touch this question.

I wonder why that is?
 
Wrong yet again Lying Lips Now, as from 2000-2006 there was a Republican congress with a Republican president who was trying to put nothing but conservatives on the Supreme Court.

It was only in 2007 (when everyone got tired of being fucked over by Repugnicans), that the Dems ended up with a majority in Congress.

Then Obama took over the White House.

Might wanna get your facts straight.

He had a majority for the first 6 years...but not a fillibuster proof majority.
He had nothing his last two years.

My facts are straight.

As for the lying lips crap you loser......got anything better....like addressing the crux of what I was saying....you know...the part about ONE MAN has little power in govertnment?

Jeez....always looking waysto punch holes in the credibility f the messnger.....but never able to punch holes in the messge.

Go back to sucking your thumb...I d not debate childen.

How many bills did Bush veto in his first 6 years?

Hmm he must have agreed with what they were doing then.

And exactly how many democrats voted for those same initiatives?

Still not one single answer from the lot of you.

I find that quite interesting.
 
Why must you lie to make a point?
Are you a progressive?
If you truly watched Beck over the years, you would know he had an allegiance to one thing and one thing only....SMALL GOVERNMENT.

He attacked any republican that wanted to increase government.

That makes him NON PARTISAN as it pertains to parties.

You did not watch the man or you would have known how he threw many republicans over the years under the bus.

So why do you lie?


Hey, genius, "Small Government" is what Republicans run on. It's one of their talking points.

The only time he attacked Republicans were when they either:

1. Didn't toe the party line.

or

2. Were no longer popular, and were dragging down the rest of the party with them, like George Bush.
 
Back
Top Bottom