Sorry bout that,
Sorry bout that,
1. So his findings stand.
2. He got shit canned for not taking the payola.
3. He was wise, because many people will go to hell for poisoning, *The Children*.
4. And people who stand in the way of justice, will find themselves not unharmed.
5. Justice will be served.
6. I would be careful about this topic it I were you.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
1. His findings do not stand.
2. He got stripped of his credentials because the results were faked.
3. Stop being a conspiratorial nutter.
1. This rat science doesn't work for me.
2. You can use it, if you feel comfortable, but for me,....no thanks.
3. Anyone claiming they are wise, have simply thrown the baby out with the bath water on this one.
4. Autism is something thats realitively new, been happening only about 30 years more or less, mostly less, the majority of Autism victims are less than twenty five years old.
5. Other know somethings up, you people are ******* sick!
6. Link:
NEJM Article Perpetuates Distrust by Mislabeling Victims of Vaccine Adverse Reactions
"The January 13 NEJM column, “The Age-Old Struggle against the Antivaccinationists” by Gregory A. Poland, M.D. and Robert M. Jacobson, M.D., absolves vaccine developers from responsibility for product safety. Both authors receive funding from vaccine manufacturers. (HERE)
The vast majority of parents of children with autism have had their children vaccinated, but noted side effects. Parent observations have been ignored and the newest label of “antivaccinationists” adds to mistrust of the intent of vaccine scientists and federal government’s oversight. The transference defensively employed by Poland and Jacobson may reflect personal views, but has a distinct slant toward policies that would protect vaccine developers and diminish accountability for product adverse reactions or side effects.
The NEJM article is a disappointment to all consumers who continue to hope that researchers will transcend hostile rhetoric and investigate reports of vaccine reactions without causing fear or intimidation to families. Poland’s previous paper on Vaccinomics and Adversomics left us hopeful it could happen. But the current NEJM paper is distinctly different. The Antivaccinationists paper patronizes readers and re-victimizes families who reported side effects following vaccinations, observing and recording abrupt changes that have persisted, which create significant daily challenges.
Vaccines are a $27 billion global market that is growing annually, aided by the near total lack of financial liability for consumer product safety. So it’s saddening, but not surprising, that this protectionist article would appear in conjunction with attacks on credibility of the scientists who investigated possible side effects of the MMR vaccine.
Relentless attacks on the credibility of the lead author mirrors tactics used to discredit Dr. Herbert Needleman, the physician who bravely reported that lead was poisoning children. Poland and Jacobson’s not-so-veiled threats urge others to abridge the freedom of speech of vaccine safety advocates; such attempts at repression sound more like a pharmaceutical company press release than a scholarly paper. Indeed, that is possible considering JAMA’s 2009 estimate that 10.9% of NEJM’s articles are ghostwritten. Such PR tactics are described in books by former NEJM editors Dr. Jerome Kassirer and Dr. Marcia Angell, which heavily criticize pharmaceutical company corruption in medical journals.
Drs. Poland and Jacobson do admit that vaccines pose risks and cause legitimate injuries, yet they also claim that many vaccine injury victims are “substituting emotional anecdotes for data.” But there is very little data on the individual cases of children with vaccine-related illness, and none of the studies used to justify vaccine safety have looked exclusively at children with reported vaccine adverse events. And how can one calculate the actual magnitude of vaccine injuries if physicians don’t recognize the symptoms, or have financial incentives for denying them?"
7. Much much more at link.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
